Rupert Cornwell: An 18th-century battle for modern health care

Out of America: Obama's reforms stir ancient fears over the demarcation of power between government and the individual

Share
Related Topics

In America, that most litigious of nations, political quarrels never die. They just end up in the law courts. Thus it is with health care reform, the signature achievement of Barack Obama's presidency thus far. Once the political argument was about rapacious insurance companies, about Tea Party allegations of "death panels" and similar sinister entities, and whether there should be a "public option" for health coverage, portrayed by opponents of the measure as a giant step towards turning the US into a socialist state. That phase however is now over – at least until 2012, when the Republicans have a shot at regaining the White House and securing a majority in the Senate to add to the majority in the House of Representatives they won in the recent mid-term elections. In that case "Obamacare" would simply be repealed.

But not yet. True, the House last month passed the charmingly named "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act" that would have struck Obamacare off the statute books. However, the Democrat-run Senate upheld the law. Waiting as a last line of defence in any case was the president's veto pen. In reality, the struggle has now shifted to the courts, where the fate will now be decided of the boldest attempt yet to align the US with every other advanced industrial economy and offer its citizens universal health insurance. The battle is no longer over technical issues such as pre-existing conditions, state-run health insurance exchanges, and reform's impact on the huge federal budget deficit. It is now much more clear cut. Does the bill the president signed on 22 March 2010 violate that most hallowed and sacrosanct of documents, the US Constitution?

In the past two months, federal judges in Virginia and Florida have ruled that a key part of the law does precisely that. Others may well follow. The section in question is the "individual mandate", in other words, Obamacare's requirement that people without insurance – roughly 15 per cent of the population – have to buy it, or face a fine of $750. The provision is absolutely essential if the law is to work. Without it, a person could literally buy insurance coverage from an ambulance on the way to the hospital emergency room.

In that case, the whole elaborate edifice of Obamacare would surely come crashing down. Insurance, be it of cars, houses or any other commodity, only works on the basis of small regular payments by the many to cover large losses by the few. And so with health care. Without the mandate, healthy people would not buy coverage until they fell ill. Insurance premiums would soar, driving more people out of the system, in turn pushing premiums even higher.

The mandate therefore is mere common sense, Europeans accustomed to a strong and interventionist state would assume. Such reasoning, however, does not take account of America's eternal conflict – one that has existed almost since the day it became a country in the late 18th century – over the demarcation of power between central government in Washington and individual states and persons. The conflict has taken several forms over the years. Sometimes it has unfolded beneath the banner of "states' rights", invoked most famously by the South in its effort to retain slavery, and subsequently to preserve racial segregation.

These days – and certainly since Ronald Reagan famously declared that "government is not the solution to our problem, it is the problem" – the battle is fought out between proponents and opponents of government intervention, between regulators and deregulators. Its most extreme manifestations involve the sects and militia groups holed up in forests and farmhouses, convinced the federal government (or worse still, the UN) is plotting to destroy them.

At issue are two provisions of the Constitution. One is the so-called Commerce Clause that basically gives Congress the right to regulate economic activity between the states. The other is known as the "Necessary and Proper" clause that allows Congress to pass laws that are "necessary and proper" for the governance of the United States, even if they are not explicitly authorised by the Constitution. Again, no problem, you would think. Health care is clearly an interstate issue, and equally obviously, a requirement for people to buy insurance is "necessary and proper" if reform is to work. But that is to ignore the legalistic bent of this country.

Yes, Judge Henry Hudson acknowledged in Virginia, the Commerce Clause allows the state to regulate economic activity. But a failure to purchase health insurance, he ruled, is not an activity: it is "inactivity." Forcing someone to buy health insurance, therefore, is akin to ordering citizens, even if they don't want to, to buy Ford or GM cars to prop up the US motor industry – or to do anything else that central government deems fit. If that isn't detested "big government", what is?

These challenges, and others pending in various states, will be appealed by the Obama administration and are certain to end up in the US Supreme Court. There, too, we Europeans would imagine, common sense will prevail and the law will be upheld. But you can't be sure. The ferocious battle over health care breaks down on strictly party lines. In the House last month, not a single Republican voted against repeal, and only three Democrats voted for it. Which, of course, brings to mind another even more ferocious political dispute that 10 years ago also ended up in the Supreme Court. It was called Bush vs Gore, and the Court's decision to halt the Florida recount handed the 2000 election to George W Bush.

That vote broke along party lines, with the bloc of four liberal justices outvoted by five conservatives. Since then, a Republican president and his Democratic successor have each appointed two new members to the Court. But the balance remains the same, a 5-4 advantage to the conservatives. The only difference is that Justice Anthony Kennedy has replaced the retired Sandra Day O'Connor as the possible swing vote. Health care reform could yet be a damn close run thing.

React Now

  • Get to the point
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Photographer / Floorplanner / Domestic Energy Assessor

£16000 - £25000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Photographer/ Floor planner /...

Ashdown Group: Front-End Developer - Surrey - £40,000

£30000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Front-End Developer - Guildford/Craw...

Recruitment Genius: Customer Service Assistant

£13500 - £15000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Customer Service Assistant is...

Recruitment Genius: Sales Executive - OTE £35,000

£16000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: An ambitious and motivated Sale...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Letter from the Whitehall Editor: The spurious Tory endorsement that misfired

Oliver Wright
 

General Election 2015: Ed Miliband hasn’t ‘suddenly’ become a robust leader. He always was

Steve Richards
Not even the 'putrid throat' could stop the Ross Poldark swoon-fest'

Not even the 'putrid throat' could stop the Ross Poldark swoon-fest'

How a costume drama became a Sunday night staple
Miliband promises no stamp duty for first-time buyers as he pushes Tories on housing

Miliband promises no stamp duty for first-time buyers

Labour leader pushes Tories on housing
Aviation history is littered with grand failures - from the the Bristol Brabazon to Concorde - but what went wrong with the SuperJumbo?

Aviation history is littered with grand failures

But what went wrong with the SuperJumbo?
Fear of Putin, Islamists and immigration is giving rise to a new generation of Soviet-style 'iron curtains' right across Europe

Fortress Europe?

Fear of Putin, Islamists and immigration is giving rise to a new generation of 'iron curtains'
Never mind what you're wearing, it's what you're reclining on

Never mind what you're wearing

It's what you're reclining on that matters
General Election 2015: Chuka Umunna on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband

Chuka Umunna: A virus of racism runs through Ukip

The shadow business secretary on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband
Yemen crisis: This exotic war will soon become Europe's problem

Yemen's exotic war will soon affect Europe

Terrorism and boatloads of desperate migrants will be the outcome of the Saudi air campaign, says Patrick Cockburn
Marginal Streets project aims to document voters in the run-up to the General Election

Marginal Streets project documents voters

Independent photographers Joseph Fox and Orlando Gili are uploading two portraits of constituents to their website for each day of the campaign
Game of Thrones: Visit the real-life kingdom of Westeros to see where violent history ends and telly tourism begins

The real-life kingdom of Westeros

Is there something a little uncomfortable about Game of Thrones shooting in Northern Ireland?
How to survive a social-media mauling, by the tough women of Twitter

How to survive a Twitter mauling

Mary Beard, Caroline Criado-Perez, Louise Mensch, Bunny La Roche and Courtney Barrasford reveal how to trounce the trolls
Gallipoli centenary: At dawn, the young remember the young who perished in one of the First World War's bloodiest battles

At dawn, the young remember the young

A century ago, soldiers of the Empire – many no more than boys – spilt on to Gallipoli’s beaches. On this 100th Anzac Day, there are personal, poetic tributes to their sacrifice
Dissent is slowly building against the billions spent on presidential campaigns – even among politicians themselves

Follow the money as never before

Dissent is slowly building against the billions spent on presidential campaigns – even among politicians themselves, reports Rupert Cornwell
Samuel West interview: The actor and director on austerity, unionisation, and not mentioning his famous parents

Samuel West interview

The actor and director on austerity, unionisation, and not mentioning his famous parents
General Election 2015: Imagine if the leading political parties were fashion labels

Imagine if the leading political parties were fashion labels

Fashion editor, Alexander Fury, on what the leaders' appearances tell us about them
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka: Home can be the unsafest place for women

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka: Home can be the unsafest place for women

The architect of the HeForShe movement and head of UN Women on the world's failure to combat domestic violence