- Thursday 23 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Thursday 11 December 2008
Sue Owen: No child should be in low-quality care
Comment
In Unicef's latest report card, it suggests 10 benchmark standards which could support children's rights as our "economically advanced" societies make the transition to using more out-of-home childcare.
Had this report come out 10 years ago, Britain would have been near the bottom of the league tables but, after years of planned and sustained investment in young children's services, we are now in the middle and have no difficulty in meeting benchmarks such as "subsidised and accredited early education services for 80 per cent of four-year-olds".
But this is not Unicef's only message. It also asks us to think about some research showing that for children under two, the provision of low-quality childcare can adversely affect their social and emotional development, doubling the disadvantage for children from low-income homes who can only afford low-quality services in the absence of universal, state-funded care like that offered in Scandinavia.
In fact, there hasn't been much research on this and the findings are mixed – for instance, current government policy is based on studies showing that childcare can be a protective factor for families with high levels of risk. One thing we can be certain of, regardless of the statistics and the complex research designs, is that no child, at any age should be in poor-quality care.
This is not something to leave to politicians, it is a debate in which we should all engage, reconsidering how to improve the training and support for people who work with young children, ensuring that pay and conditions improve and that they get the appreciation and status their work deserves. Only these things will ensure that they stay in jobs and build long-term relationships with children and families.
We are very different from Denmark, where a much more homogeneous society is willing to contribute financially to services for which the standards and goals are recognised and agreed. In our messy, mixed economy of childcare which has grown up over time to serve a variety of families, there is little consensus on quality and how to pay for it. If the Unicef study reminds us of this and encourages further debate about childcare, then it will have done us a big service.
Sue Owen is the director of wellbeing at the National Children's Bureau
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
Day In a Page
Edward VIII’s phone calls - and how MI5 bugged them
Hollywood's random acts of red-carpet kindness
Not secure any more: G4S boss heads for exit at last
How to say ‘I’m a sellout’