The Government will be punished if it defies the wishes of Londoners

'New Labour would be in a stronger position if it had not starved public services for two years'

Share

The most important item on my agenda since the London elections has been my talks with the Government about its Comprehensive Spending Review which will determine the resources available to London to modernise the capital's transport system.

The most important item on my agenda since the London elections has been my talks with the Government about its Comprehensive Spending Review which will determine the resources available to London to modernise the capital's transport system.

For ten weeks these discussions went excellently, primarily with the Minister for London, Keith Hill, and his officials. Their purpose was to achieve a broad measure of agreement on London's transport needs in order to make the strongest possible case to the Treasury for the funds necessary to meet them.

Officials from both sides were involved in dozens of hours of detailed negotiation and there were at least six meetings between myself and ministers, including John Prescott the Deputy Prime Minister.

We rapidly reached agreement on the broad approach - which was to reduce traffic congestion by persuading motorists to transfer to social and public transport. Given the extreme over-crowding on the Tube and overground rail services and the unreliability and slowness of the buses, this would require a major programme of investment to increase the capacity on the Tube and railway and to provide more reliable, faster and more comfortable bus services. And given the time-scales involved in constructing new Tube and rail lines, it became clear that the most immediate improvements could be made to bus services where there is some spare capacity.

Such improvements in public transport, and other, complementary, measures would in turn make possible the introduction of congestion charging to reduce unnecessary car journeys in central London. On this point, ministers repeatedly made it absolutely clear to me that they were determined that congestion charging should be a success - which is why they put it in the Greater London Authority Act - and that it would have their full support in London.

Similarly we rapidly agreed on a number of key capital projects - extending the East London line, building CrossRail, linking east and west London, constructing new East Thames river crossings to assist in the economic regeneration of that part of London. I was also keen to take forward preparatory work for a new Hackney/Wimbledon Tube line. A series of steps to improve bus services was also common ground.

There were differences on some of the measures I considered important to produce rapid improvements in bus journey times - by introducing more conductors - and in making public transport more attractive by holding down fares. With evidence that conductors reduce bus journey times by 10 per cent, I wanted to triple the number in central London. I also wanted to freeze bus fares and bring in a flat rate bus throughout London.

Ministers and officials at the Department of the Environment, on the other hand, wanted to keep such measures to a minimum and concentrate on capital projects. There were compromises on both sides - recognition, for example, that congestion charging requires making public transport more attractive. We narrowed our differences and I trimmed my proposals to some £3.4 billion - which, while we were given no figures, appeared to be closer to what the Government Office for London was looking for.

We all agreed that this process had been highly constructive and useful to both sides. All of the indications were that there would be a good settlement for London.

Then, at the last moment, something was introduced which had never once arisen in all of the previous ten weeks of discussion. With my office geared to give a warm welcome to the Spending Review, less than 24 hours before John Prescott made his announcement in the House of Commons, something was introduced which had never been mentioned - that I would have to pay an enormous bill for the Jubilee Line extension.

This was a bombshell - I believe to Keith Hill as much as it was to me. All previous discussions had specifically excluded the London Underground because the government has not yet given control of the Tube to the Mayor. Now we were being told that we would have to pay out £104 million in the year 2001-2, leaving just £114 million for improvements to public transport over and above existing plans.

This meant that what was a very good settlement overall - £3.2 billion over three years - was massively back-loaded with only £114million in the first year, £428 million in the second and £637 million in the third for improvements over existing plans.

What is the logic of this?

If it is the mistaken idea that it is better to promise improvements in the future than deliver them now, the Treasury should have already learnt its lesson. The Government would be in a much stronger position today if it had smoothed its programme of public investment over its five year term - instead of starving the NHS, transport, education, and other departments of investment for two years and then promising large increases, some of which won't kick in until after the next general election.

London needs a steady improvement in its transport system. Giving us just less than 10 per cent of the funds in the first year will just introduce a totally artificial delay.

Alternatively, some kind of scorched earth tendency may have been instrumental in dropping in the Jubilee Line bill at the last minute to punish London. If that is the case, they will have only hurt the government.

The only way to win the support of the people of London is to act in their interests. Again the lessons of the recent past must be learned. Those who thought it was clever to try to stop London choosing its mayoral candidate did not do that and London punished them for it.

Myself, Labour Assembly members, Keith Hill and, I believe, John Prescott, did try to get a fair deal for the capital. If anyone deliberately tried to mess that up by dropping in the Jubilee Line bill at the last minute, then that was not clever. It was nuts - and nuts from the government's point of view. Only an idiot would irritate London by making it wait a year for the sake of £100 million out of a £3.2 billion three-year programme.

If it was deliberate, Tony Blair should call these types together before they cause any more damage. If not, and if it was simply some kind of cock-up, then I'm sure that together we will still be able to find the resources necessary to ensure that London waits no longer than necessary.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Sauce Recruitment: Retail Planning Manager - Home Entertainment UK

salary equal to £40K pro-rata: Sauce Recruitment: Are you available to start a...

Ashdown Group: Front-End Developer - London - up to £40,000

£35000 - £40000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Creative Front-End Developer - Claph...

Recruitment Genius: Product Quality Assurance Technologist - Hardline & Electric

£18000 - £24000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The role in this successful eco...

Ashdown Group: QA Tester - London - £30,000

£28000 - £30000 per annum: Ashdown Group: QA Tester - London - £30,000 QA Tes...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

CPAC 2015: What I learnt from the US — and what the US could learn from Ukip

Nigel Farage
 

If I were Prime Minister: I would create a government that actually reflects its people

Kaliya Franklin
HIV pill: Scientists hail discovery of 'game-changer' that cuts the risk of infection among gay men by 86%

Scientists hail daily pill that protects against HIV infection

Breakthrough in battle against global scourge – but will the NHS pay for it?
How we must adjust our lifestyles to nature: Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch

Time to play God

Welcome to the 'Anthropocene', the human epoch where we may need to redefine nature itself
MacGyver returns, but with a difference: Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman

MacGyver returns, but with a difference

Handyman hero of classic 1980s TV series to be recast as a woman
Tunnel renaissance: Why cities are hiding roads down in the ground

Tunnel renaissance

Why cities are hiding roads underground
'Backstreet Boys - Show 'Em What You're Made Of': An affectionate look at five middle-aged men

Boys to men

The Backstreet Boys might be middle-aged, married and have dodgy knees, but a heartfelt documentary reveals they’re not going gently into pop’s good night
Crufts 2015: Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?

Crufts 2015

Should foreign dogs be allowed to compete?
10 best projectors

How to make your home cinema more cinematic: 10 best projectors

Want to recreate the big-screen experience in your sitting room? IndyBest sizes up gadgets to form your film-watching
Manchester City 1 Barcelona 2 player ratings: Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man?

Manchester City vs Barcelona player ratings

Luis Suarez? Lionel Messi? Joe Hart? Who was the star man at the Etihad?
Arsenal vs Monaco: Monaco - the making of Gunners' manager Arsene Wenger

Monaco: the making of Wenger

Jack Pitt-Brooke speaks to former players and learns the Frenchman’s man-management has always been one of his best skills
Cricket World Cup 2015: Chris Gayle - the West Indies' enigma lives up to his reputation

Chris Gayle: The West Indies' enigma

Some said the game's eternal rebel was washed up. As ever, he proved he writes the scripts by producing a blistering World Cup innings
In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare and murky loyalties prevails

In Ukraine a dark world of hybrid warfare

This war in the shadows has been going on since the fall of Mr Yanukovych
'Birdman' and 'Bullets Over Broadway': Homage or plagiarism?

Homage or plagiarism?

'Birdman' shares much DNA with Woody Allen's 'Bullets Over Broadway'
Broadchurch ends as damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

A damp squib not even David Tennant can revive

Broadchurch, Series 2 finale, review
A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower: inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

Inside the mansion of Germany's 'Bishop of Bling'

A Koi carp breeding pond, wall-mounted iPads and a bathroom with a 'wellness' shower