- Monday 20 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Emily Jupp
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Friday 17 July 2009
Leading article: How to bank on better governance
Such is the popular feeling of anger towards banks and bankers that, even before Sir David Walker completed his Treasury-commissioned review of the governance of financial institutions, he was being widely dismissed as a City old boy who would never turn on his own. That is unfair both to the man and the report as it has been finally published. Sir David is a wise old bird with considerable experience, and what he has to say is both sensible and useful.
Bank boards, he argues, failed to control their own institutions in the run-up to the crash. The solution, he proposes, is for the standard of non-executive directors to be sharply raised, for company chairmen to be required to devote two-thirds of their time to the business and for new risk committees to be set up, chaired by non-executives.
On the highly charged issue of bonuses, he suggests a far greater degree of disclosure of remuneration, not just of the board but of the main traders and executives. Bonuses, he says, should be paid over a longer time-frame and remuneration committees should be more accountable to shareholders.
This is fine as far as it goes. All these moves would make banks better governed and so have much to recommend them. But we should not imagine that such moves are sufficient to stop a repeat of last year's financial cataclysm. There is nothing in Sir David's proposals that would seriously challenge the bonus culture that, as we are seeing, still prevails in large financial institutions. Nor is there anything that would have averted the misjudgements that led to such crazy risk-taking in the years of the credit bubble. Even well-qualified and hardworking directors were caught up in the madness.
To have any chance of preventing future crises, we need direct oversight of the banks by independent regulators with the expertise to know what is going on and the power to put a stop to bad practice.
Sir David provides some useful measures that would make banks more accountable to their shareholders. But when it comes to reducing systemic risk throughout finance, self-regulation by the banks is not the answer.
-
'Revenge porn' is no longer a niche activity which victimises only celebrities - the law must intervene
Memphis Barker -
Robert Fisk: Where else but Northern Ireland would a killer on a school board even be mooted as a possibility?
Robert Fisk -
The Daily Cartoon
-
The moral case on tax avoidance is overwhelming - and we all know Google wants to do the right thing
Owen Jones -
It’s official: thanks to Stephen Hawking's Israel boycott, anti-Semitism is no more
Howard Jacobson
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
-
British business: We need to stay in the European Union - or risk losing up to £92bn a year
-
Independent Scotland 'might not be able to guarantee savers' deposits'
-
The ‘Beverly Hills’ of Surrey pays more income tax than big cities of the North
-
Keep the change, say Germans alarmed by European plan to scrap copper coins
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
iJobs General
BI Developer
£450 - £500 per annum: Progressive Recruitment: BI Developer (SQL Server 2008,...
Head of SENCO- Reading
Negotiable: Randstad Education Reading: Our client is a co-educational boardin...
SAP Project Manager
£60000 - £70000 per annum: Progressive Recruitment: Your technical knowledge o...
Telesales Executive
£16000 - £18000 per annum + OTE: Connex Education: Connex are a reputable and ...
Day In a Page
The price of pacifism
Jason Isaacs: Groupies, theatre bores and James Bond
Sealand: 'Micronation' or illegal fortress?
Legend of James Hunt has set Hollywood hearts racing
Macklemore: 'I don't have moderation'
