- Saturday 18 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Emily Jupp
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Tuesday 22 May 2012
Leading article: Olympic brands aren't this sacred
Some £2bn is being provided by the sponsors of the 2012 London Olympics. Without substantial financial contributions from firms like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, BP and BMW it would, quite simply, not be possible for the Games to happen. So it is quite right that the London 2012 authorities should seek to control the use of official names and logos and prevent their unauthorised use by other companies. Coke would rightly object if adverts for Pepsi were emblazoned across billboards within camera shot when coverage commenced.
Having said that, the authorities should be reasonable and proportionate in how they apply the rules. It is one thing to prevent what the advertising industry calls "ambush marketing", whereby big businesses attempt to attach their image to the Games without paying sponsorship fees. But reports suggest that those in charge are being ridiculously overzealous in their interpretation of what violates the rules.
This extends from prohibiting local firms from using the words "London 2012" on their advertising to outlawing the use of images of previous Games. Brand police will have the power to force pubs to take down banners inviting the public to "Come inside and watch the Olympics on our TV". They have announced they will force roadside hotdog stands to place stickers on any products that are not official to cover up their brand names. Traders have been told they can only sell soft drinks and bottled water from the Coca-Cola corporation.
Businesses will not even be permitted to use the official logo on their website to create a link to the official Olympics website. And it is not just businesses along official Olympic routes; an entertainment company in Brighton, whose website advertised "sports-themed acts for 2012", was told one acrobat could not be photographed using hoops in the Olympic colours.
Such restrictions are absurd. They risk souring the public passion and goodwill surrounding the 2012 London Olympics. They also create unnecessary burdens for the small firms and one-man businesses which the politicians who bid for the Games promised would be helped by the event. The Olympics should be creating enthusiasm and excitement, not mean-spirited petty-fogging. The spirit of the law, not its letter, should be the watchword.
-
Gove’s lesson: spare the comma, spoil the child
Mark Steel -
The Oxford sex ring shows how the sexual manners of a new place can be tragically misinterpreted
Philip Hensher -
The penis size study: How do British men fare?
Laura Davis -
The Daily Cartoon
-
It’s official: thanks to Stephen Hawking's Israel boycott, anti-Semitism is no more
Howard Jacobson
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
iJobs General
PHP/ Drupal Developer - £35k - WC
£30000 - £40000 per annum + BENS: Progressive Recruitment: Drupal Developer A ...
C# WEB DEVELOPER
£45000 - £50000 per annum + bens: Progressive Recruitment: C# WEB DEVELOPER Le...
WPF Developer (C#, VB.Net) - North East - 6 Months
£240 - £260 per day: Progressive Recruitment: WPF Developer (C#, VB.Net) North...
KS2 PPA teacher
£85 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Cheshire: KS2 teacher needed to do PPA ...
Day In a Page
The price of pacifism
Jason Isaacs: Groupies, theatre bores and James Bond
Sealand: 'Micronation' or illegal fortress?
One man returns to Argentina's town that drowned
Gordon Ramsay's worst nightmare: A restaurant he cannot save
Why bitters are back on the bar
The 10 Best barbecues
