- Wednesday 19 June 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
- Offers
Wednesday 6 October 2004
This gaffe shows that Mr Bush is vulnerable after all
Donald Rumsfeld's admission that there is no "hard evidence" that Saddam Hussein's regime was in league with al-Qa'ida, will have surprised no one who took the trouble to read the report produced by the US 9/11 commission in July. The commission concluded that there was no operational link between the Iraqi president and Osama bin Laden, despite the Bush administration's repeated insinuations to that effect. Mr Rumsfeld's hasty efforts to backtrack, by citing past CIA reports positing a Saddam-Bin Laden link, hardly convinced.
Donald Rumsfeld's admission that there is no "hard evidence" that Saddam Hussein's regime was in league with al-Qa'ida, will have surprised no one who took the trouble to read the report produced by the US 9/11 commission in July. The commission concluded that there was no operational link between the Iraqi president and Osama bin Laden, despite the Bush administration's repeated insinuations to that effect. Mr Rumsfeld's hasty efforts to backtrack, by citing past CIA reports positing a Saddam-Bin Laden link, hardly convinced.
In electoral terms, Mr Rumsfeld's was a gaffe of the highest order. But it was also the truth. And its significance is not just that the Secretary of Defence has become the highest-ranking figure in the Bush administration to admit it, but that US voters are almost for the first time taking serious notice. The war is now the central issue in the campaign and President Bush is, at last, being held to account for the weak - and highly ideological - case he made for deposing Saddam Hussein.
Mr Rumsfeld's embarrassing admission came as Dick Cheney and John Edwards made final preparations for their vice-presidential debate and it was bound to cast a shadow. It was, after all, in the first presidential debate last week that John Kerry scored his first real points against Mr Bush on the war. When Mr Bush denied that the war on Iraq was pre-emptive - because "they attacked us" - Mr Kerry pointed out that it was not Saddam Hussein who had attacked the US, but Bin Laden. Mr Bush could only yelp back: "I know that."
This was not Mr Bush's finest hour and, for once, America seemed to be paying heed. Mr Kerry clearly won the debate and, after lagging in the polls since his party convention, is now neck and neck with the President.
Mr Rumsfeld's frantic efforts to limit the damage yesterday suggest, too, that his mis-timed candour was more than a gaffe. It was the first real sign that Mr Bush's highly polished and well-oiled machine conceals a certain fragility. Under pressure, it could crack. Now that they have identified where Mr Bush is vulnerable, Mr Kerry and Mr Edwards must keep up the attack.
-
Is their marriage our business? No. But Charles Saatchi's row with Nigella Lawson is definitely news
Simon Kelner -
Russell Brand lets loose on MSNBC hosts in promo interview for Messiah Complex tour
-
The Daily Cartoon
-
We never knew Nigella Lawson - and we still don’t
Ellen E Jones -
This isn’t ending world hunger. It’s just a sham
Ian Birrell
-
Russell Brand lets loose on MSNBC hosts in promo interview for Messiah Complex tour
-
The Girl Guides have nothing to do with religion and they never have done
-
Letters: Islam and assaults on women
-
Debate: Should bad bankers be jailed?
-
The problem with the Taliban peace talks is not women, it’s their absence
-
Fifty signs of getting older? They missed a few
How will you make today delicious?
Tell us how you plan to make today delicious and you could win a £50 M&S gift card.
Win a Nook® Simple Touch eReader
Find out how Nook® is supporting the Evening Standard's Get Reading campaign - and your chance to win one.
Free reading festival for families
Follow The Standard's campaign to get London's children reading - and experience this unique event at Trafalgar Square on 13 July.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
iJobs General
FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer
£500 - £600 per day: Orgtel: FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer - Ba...
Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT
£600 - £700 per day: Orgtel: Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT C...
Lighting Design Engineer
£33000 - £35000 Per Annum: The Green Recruitment Company: The Green Recruitmen...
Are you an Primary NQT looking for your first role in Essex?
£21000 - £22000 per annum: Randstad Education Chelmsford: NQTs required now fo...
Day In a Page
First night: The Cripple of Inishmaan
Scandi-geeks descend on Nordicana for fan-convention
Female aristocrats battle to inherit the title


