Friendly societies that smile on self-help: Provident groups should regain their Victorian role as the main source of welfare, argues Keith Joseph

Share
Related Topics
THE CENTRAL assumption of British politics in the 20th century has been the primary competence of the state in matters of benevolence. Lloyd George's beguiling promise of ninepence for fourpence - a National Insurance scheme that would offer more comprehensive benefits than any private provision - won the 1906 election. It is time we exorcised this error.

Socialism as an idea for directing industry has evaporated, yet market alternatives to welfare remain marginalised in debate. This is a tactical disadvantage to the liberal capitalist side in politics. If we win the skirmish to let competitive markets supply merely socks and videos and chocolate biscuits but not welfare, we lose the greater war of ideas.

The vast empire of the Department of Social Security is constructed on an error. It is legitimate that the state obliges us all to be insured when we drive on the road - for third parties as much as ourselves. This does not mean the state has to supply the contingent insurance. If the Ministry of Transport had operated a national monopoly vehicle insurance cover, do we imagine it would have done better than a market of rivals?

It seems plain to me that the monies now harvested by the state and redistributed in numerous 'benefits' could be subcontracted through competing agents. There would still be a measure of compulsion. We would all be obliged to contribute to welfare bodies. The 'poor risks' would be allocated as they are now, but perhaps randomly.

Words are powerful magic. National Insurance sounds splendid. In fact, it is a chain letter across the generations. It is not analogous to any insurance contract.

What generous returns could be enjoyed if NI contributions were placed in deferred annuities or other insurance instruments. If welfare sums were computed no longer as transfer payments but as savings, the nation's GDP figures would be enhanced, too.

It was a successful piece of political enterprise by Lloyd George to use sleight of hand to create National Insurance. It would not be difficult to outbid the left with a better set of offers. No actuary will contest that NI contributions would accrue far better benefits if placed in the investment markets.

One hundred years ago, says the caricature of history, there was only degradation and destitution for those of modest means. I think history has to be rediscovered. Dr David Green of the Institute of Economic Affairs has done some valuable pioneering work in describing the extent of provident insurance in Victorian Britain.

The primary vehicles for savings and insurance and pensions were the friendly societies. Ten million people were subscribing members in 1894. These societies have some claim to have been the midwives at the birth of the Labour Party. The original Labour Representation Committee found its support from the provident societies, not the trade unions. I propose that they be re-empowered to allow welfare choices to supplement or to displace the state.

Friendly societies remain the most tax-efficient savings vehicle for individuals. They pay no tax. Yet the tax rules allow only pounds 200 a year to be invested in them. I believe it is time to allow the friendly societies to resume the role they fulfilled in the past.

The power of friendly societies lay in their name. They were based on propinquity. People in a community of town or factory were known to each other. They were critical of performance. If the Rotherham Friendly Society offered better results than the Doncaster, you were free to switch. Recipients of benefit were seen to be either genuine or doubtful, thereby minimising the moral hazard.

There is more. Rather than pay for unemployment, the society would strive to find people jobs. It was in their interest to do so. Nobody can claim that a JobCentre employee has any sensation of personal loss when he fails to place someone in work.

If health were part of a future friendly society culture, I have no doubt that smoking and other costly habits would open members to sanction through shame. Small platoon loyalties mean far more than big battalion rules.

Who now remembers that until 1948 the friendly societies used to disburse state benefits on an agency basis? The government found that they delivered entitlements more cheaply than a civil service administration and with a close knowledge of the recipients.

A new generation of friendly societies might be attached to bodies such as housing associations. Charities and churches could offer friendly society services as supplements for their supporters. These would enhance the informal social glue. The point is to create clubs that are more than another part of the financial services sector.

If I am correct in seeing virtues in friendly societies, then enlightened personnel managers might find them attractive additions to the lives of their companies, too. We need clubs that draw in participant members, not exclusive groups.

The details matter, but the heart of my argument is the strategic one. It allows those who believe in the voluntary over the coercive to out-manoeuvre the left on its moral high ground.

Just as the Labour Party's hostility to council house sales was a tactical catastrophe, so its animosity to alternatives to state benefits would wrong-foot its electoral appeal.

This is more than an argument to the Treasury to allow friendly society contributions to match the per capita tax cost of welfare. I am not in the business of tax relief. I want to challenge the unquestioned assumption that the DSS need be a monopoly.

It seems likely that more generous benefits can be delivered at a lesser cost. But balance sheet considerations are of less importance than any mechanisms that will nourish a sense of community and intimacy.

I think friendly societies, now lingering only as the hamsters in the financial bestiary, could again become the primary vehicle for welfare. Privatisation and contracting out has opened up a new landscape. It is time that we applied these experiences to social security.

What a tragedy that Keir Hardie and the British left did not read Samuel Smiles more. Mitigating poverty and giving people dignity can better be done through self-help than socialism.

Lord Joseph was Secretary of State for Social Services, 1970-74.

Matthew Symonds is unwell.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Senior QA Engineer - Agile, SCRUM

£35000 - £50000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: Senior QA Engineer (Agil...

Marketing Executive - West Midlands - £28,000

£26000 - £28000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Digital Marketing Executive (SEO, PP...

Retail Business Analyst

£40000 - £50000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Our retail client ...

Senior C++ Developer

£400 - £450 Per Annum possibly more for the right candidate: Clearwater People...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

i Editor's Letter: We are winning the fight against extreme poverty and hunger. It's time to up the ante

Oliver Duff Oliver Duff
David Cameron addresses No campagn supporters in Aberdeen  

Scottish independence: Cameron faces a choice between destroying his country or his party

Matthew Norman
Mystery of the Ground Zero wedding photo

A shot in the dark

Mystery of the wedding photo from Ground Zero
His life, the universe and everything

His life, the universe and everything

New biography sheds light on comic genius of Douglas Adams
Save us from small screen superheroes

Save us from small screen superheroes

Shows like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D are little more than marketing tools
Reach for the skies

Reach for the skies

From pools to football pitches, rooftop living is looking up
These are the 12 best hotel spas in the UK

12 best hotel spas in the UK

Some hotels go all out on facilities; others stand out for the sheer quality of treatments
These Iranian-controlled Shia militias used to specialise in killing American soldiers. Now they are fighting Isis, backed up by US airstrikes

Widespread fear of Isis is producing strange bedfellows

Iranian-controlled Shia militias that used to kill American soldiers are now fighting Isis, helped by US airstrikes
Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Shoppers don't come to Topshop for the unique
How to make a Lego masterpiece

How to make a Lego masterpiece

Toy breaks out of the nursery and heads for the gallery
Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Urbanites are cursed with an acronym pointing to Employed but No Disposable Income or Savings
Paisley’s decision to make peace with IRA enemies might remind the Arabs of Sadat

Ian Paisley’s decision to make peace with his IRA enemies

His Save Ulster from Sodomy campaign would surely have been supported by many a Sunni imam
'She was a singer, a superstar, an addict, but to me, her mother, she is simply Amy'

'She was a singer, a superstar, an addict, but to me, her mother, she is simply Amy'

Exclusive extract from Janis Winehouse's poignant new memoir
Is this the role to win Cumberbatch an Oscar?

Is this the role to win Cumberbatch an Oscar?

The Imitation Game, film review
England and Roy Hodgson take a joint step towards redemption in Basel

England and Hodgson take a joint step towards redemption

Welbeck double puts England on the road to Euro 2016
Relatives fight over Vivian Maier’s rare photos

Relatives fight over Vivian Maier’s rare photos

Pictures removed from public view as courts decide ownership
‘Fashion has to be fun. It’s a big business, not a cure for cancer’

‘Fashion has to be fun. It’s a big business, not a cure for cancer’

Donatella Versace at New York Fashion Week