Labour shouldn't bank on another term

Share
Related Topics
ONE OF the consequences of the comings and goings of the last couple of weeks - more goings than comings - is that suddenly the Government appears mortal, subject to the usual laws of political life and death. Some commentators have already written that the Government looks vulnerable. This is perhaps not the right word. A few adverse by-elections are not going to affect Mr Tony Blair's majority in any significant way. He is more like Lady Thatcher, a comparison he himself seems to relish, than Mr John Major or Lord Callaghan.

Subject to the Human Rights Act, our various European obligations and the views of Mr George Soros, he can do more or less as he likes. As Walter Bagehot wrote, there is no arguing with the brute force of a parliamentary majority. If he had got up to what Mr Bill Clinton has, far from being tried by the Lords at the suit of the Commons (our old version of impeachment), he would find himself tucked up snug under the blanket of collective responsibility and the eiderdown of a vote of confidence, all the Labour ladies pirouetting through the lobbies on his behalf even more enthusiastically than they did in support of bombing Iraq.

On this I disagree with the view expressed in this paper last week by my friend Geoffrey Wheatcroft. Quite apart from the size of Mr Blair's majority, no Labour prime minister in office (there were only four before him) has ever been removed by his colleagues. Ramsay MacDonald deserted them to head an ostensibly national government in 1931. He acted as he did more from the unconstitutional pressure exerted on him by George V than from any treachery on his own part - the latter still the accepted version of history in the People's Party. Harold Wilson resigned in 1976 in circumstances which are still thought by some to be mysterious but were in fact quite straightforward. He had planned his resignation for a long time and, but for unforeseen events, intended to go slightly sooner than he did.

Mr Blair is unlikely to do a MacDonald, or a Wilson for that matter. But he may nevertheless meet the same fate as C R Attlee in 1951, Harold Wilson in 1970 or James Callaghan in 1979. He may still be rejected by the voters. I do not want to boast; though, as Lord Beaverbrook used to say, if you do not blow your own trumpet no one else is going to blow it for you. But I was, I think, the first to point out what may be called The Fallacy of the Second Term or: It May Never Happen.

I did so more on historical grounds than because of any expectation of failure by Mr Blair's government. The Liberal majority which Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman had secured in 1906 and H H Asquith inherited in 1908 was to disappear in 1910, even though the Liberals were to remain in power until 1915 and Asquith, briefly as prime minister of a coalition government, until 1916. True, Attlee won a second term in 1950 by a majority of five. In those days, before Labour in 1964-66 and for most of the 1970s, and before the Conservatives in the mid-1990s, this was considered too small for effective government. Eminent persons talked as if we had a constitutional crisis on our hands. This talk, together with the death or illness of several senior colleagues, led Attlee to call an unnecessary election in 1951 which he duly lost.

Wilson also won second terms in 1966 and in October 1974. But on both occasions he was building on a small or non-existent majority. No period of Labour government has lasted for more than six years. It was this which Mr Blair was and remains determined to change.

His ambition distorts current politics not only because of the history of the century but also because of the peculiar nature of the 1997 election. Certainly a win is a win, a result a result, a majority a majority. But there was something very odd about the contest all the same, and not merely because Labour could obtain a majority of 179 when only 31 per cent of the electorate had voted for the party. It was odd because it was a kind of by-election on a national scale: the voters were determined to turn the Conservatives out, to punish them. To this end they voted both Labour and Liberal Democrat, using tactical voting nationally for the first time.

Does Mr Blair think he is going to hang on to the new Labour voters by keeping taxes as low as he can and by making noises which he hopes will prove agreeable to the Sun and the Daily Mail? If he does, I think he is deluding himself. These people came in anger, and they can perfectly well go away again in sorrow. They can depart in anger too: about the health service, unemployment, education, all those "real" issues which Mr Blair promised to resolve once he was prime minister. They can also go because of the fug of humbug which, after the the departure of Mr Peter Mandelson and others, now clings to the Government.

Oddly enough, I do not think the adventures of Mr Robin Cook contribute to this atmosphere, even if, contrary to Mr Blair's view, he is hardly the most impressive occupant of his office in modern times. It was Mr Alastair Campbell who was responsible for causing the mess in the first place. Mr Campbell presented Mr Cook with an ultimatum at the very moment when he was about to embark on a holiday with the then Mrs Cook: he could either stay with his wife or make an honest woman of his mistress.

Mr Campbell followed this impudent course not so much to forestall as to draw the sting, or so he erroneously supposed, of a story that was about to appear in the News of the World. In fact he gave the story what we in the trade call "legs", which have grown progressively longer. In Mr Cook's place I should have told Mr Campbell to mind his own business and do something useful with his time, such as sort out the stationery cupboard at No 10.

The precise details of all scandals are forgotten in six months, except by the politically obsessed: but a general impression remains. If Mr Blair loses 90 seats, his control of the Commons disappears, though his may still be the largest party. Looked at in this way, such an outcome in 2001 or 2002 is by no means out of the question, though it would clearly help if the Conservatives had someone other than Mr William Hague as their leader. Is Mr Blair confident of being able to hang on to, say, Ribble South, Scarborough, Portsmouth North, Broxtowe and Edgbaston, to name but a few?

In these uncertain circumstances one would expect the cause of electoral reform to be gaining support on the Labour benches. An electorate that wanted to punish Mr Major may want to do likewise to Mr Blair. This is Labour's opportunity not so much to cement itself in office, for that would be both impossible and immoral, as to render its removal more difficult.

But not a bit of it. Though Mr Blair has unexpectedly snubbed his backbenchers by treating Mr Paddy Ashdown as a long-lost nephew, the departure of Mr Mandelson seems to have led to the placing of electoral reform at the back of the fridge, next to the mouldy tomato and the bits of old cheese that are too hard to do anything with except grate. Mr Blair may live to regret it. Lord Jenkins did a lot of work on voting systems, freely giving of his time. He almost succeeded in making electoral reform an amusing subject. He is already justified in being rather cross with Mr Blair.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

PPC Co-Ordinator – Permanent - West Sussex – £24-£30k

£24000 - £30000 Per Annum: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: Are you a Marketin...

Senior Asset Manager

£70000 - £75000 Per Annum: The Green Recruitment Company: Katie Robinson +44 (...

IT Support Analyst (2nd Line Support) - City, London

£28000 - £30000 per annum + Pension, Healthcare: Ashdown Group: IT Support Ana...

KS1 Teacher

£90 - £120 per day: Randstad Education Leicester: KS1 Teaching Specialist Leic...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

In Sickness and in Health: It’s been lonely in bed without my sleep soulmate

Rebecca Armstrong
A man shoots at targets depicting a portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a shooting range in the center of the western Ukrainian city of Lviv  

Why do we stand by and watch Putin?

Ian Birrell
Alexander Fury: The designer names to look for at fashion week this season

The big names to look for this fashion week

This week, designers begin to show their spring 2015 collections in New York
Will Self: 'I like Orwell's writing as much as the next talented mediocrity'

'I like Orwell's writing as much as the next talented mediocrity'

Will Self takes aim at Orwell's rules for writing plain English
Meet Afghanistan's middle-class paint-ballers

Meet Afghanistan's middle-class paint-ballers

Toy guns proving a popular diversion in a country flooded with the real thing
Al Pacino wows Venice

Al Pacino wows Venice

Ham among the brilliance as actor premieres two films at festival
Neil Lawson Baker interview: ‘I’ve gained so much from art. It’s only right to give something back’.

Neil Lawson Baker interview

‘I’ve gained so much from art. It’s only right to give something back’.
The other Mugabe who is lining up for the Zimbabwean presidency

The other Mugabe who is lining up for the Zimbabwean presidency

Wife of President Robert Mugabe appears to have her sights set on succeeding her husband
The model of a gadget launch: Cultivate an atmosphere of mystery and excitement to sell stuff people didn't realise they needed

The model for a gadget launch

Cultivate an atmosphere of mystery and excitement to sell stuff people didn't realise they needed
Alice Roberts: She's done pretty well, for a boffin without a beard

She's done pretty well, for a boffin without a beard

Alice Roberts talks about her new book on evolution - and why her early TV work drew flak from (mostly male) colleagues
Get well soon, Joan Rivers - an inspiration, whether she likes it or not

Get well soon, Joan Rivers

She is awful. But she's also wonderful, not in spite of but because of the fact she's forever saying appalling things, argues Ellen E Jones
Doctor Who Into the Dalek review: A classic sci-fi adventure with all the spectacle of a blockbuster

A fresh take on an old foe

Doctor Who Into the Dalek more than compensated for last week's nonsensical offering
Fashion walks away from the celebrity runway show

Fashion walks away from the celebrity runway show

As the collections start, fashion editor Alexander Fury finds video and the internet are proving more attractive
Meet the stars of TV's Wolf Hall... and it's not the cast of the Tudor trilogy

Meet the stars of TV's Wolf Hall...

... and it's not the cast of the Tudor trilogy
Weekend at the Asylum: Europe's biggest steampunk convention heads to Lincoln

Europe's biggest steampunk convention

Jake Wallis Simons discovers how Victorian ray guns and the martial art of biscuit dunking are precisely what the 21st century needs
Don't swallow the tripe – a user's guide to weasel words

Don't swallow the tripe – a user's guide to weasel words

Lying is dangerous and unnecessary. A new book explains the strategies needed to avoid it. John Rentoul on the art of 'uncommunication'
Daddy, who was Richard Attenborough? Was the beloved thespian the last of the cross-generation stars?

Daddy, who was Richard Attenborough?

The atomisation of culture means that few of those we regard as stars are universally loved any more, says DJ Taylor