Leading Article : Ulster should say `yes'

Share
Related Topics
Yesterday's proposals for a constitutional settlement in Northern Ireland are of historic importance. No one can say whether they will lead to the earnestly desired outcome of a peaceful and stable life for the people of Northern Ireland, but there is a decent chance that they will. Their imaginative approach may even resonate in other, yet more violent ethnic conflicts on the eastern rim of Europe, not to mention in large tracts of Africa and Asia. The framework document offers ways to recognise apparently opposing national identities without reopening the explosive issue of where borders should lie.

If the thinking contained in the document could be made real in new political institutions and practices, the achievement would rank with decolonisation and entry into the Common Market as milestones in the United Kingdom's constitutional progress since the Second World War.

If Northern Ireland could be successfully reformed, while remaining within the Union, the process would also challenge those who argue that devolution in Scotland and Wales will inevitably lead to the break-up of Britain. Flexibility and constitutional innovation would be recognised for what it is: a policy that can preserve rather than destroy the integrity of the United Kingdom, a necessary part of the powers of adaptation that all successful nations require.

The principles of consent and a mix of constitutional checks and balances that underlie the proposals also offer an invigorating cocktail which the rest of Britain may wish to sup. If Northern Ireland can have proportional representation, a more consensual form of government and a charter of rights, then why can other citizens living in Britain not also enjoy such democratic innovations?

We must all hope therefore that the people of Northern Ireland will examine the framework document with a judicious eye. After more than 25 years of violence, no one needs to tell them that the price of failing to negotiate or of supporting an unjust, poorly underpinned peace is high and unremitting.

So what do the proposals amount to? In essence, they represent an attempt to reconcile the aspiration of most Roman Catholics for an Irish identity with a largely Protestant desire to secure the Union with Great Britain. For more than 70 years, these aims have been regarded as mutually exclusive. Catholics sought a united Ireland, sometimes through violence, and so alienated Protestants. Unionists have abhorred any notion of a united Ireland, fearful that it would kill their culture. So they monopolised power, abused their majority position and refused to think constructively beyond the political status quo.

Yesterday's proposals aim to take the core issue of the maintenance of the Union out of political debate; anyone who signs up to the framework proposals must accept that the Union may survive for all time. It can be abolished only with the consent, through a referendum, of the people of Northern Ireland. Equally, the framework document seeks to satisfy nationalist hopes with a plethora of cross-border bodies and the prospect that nationalists might still secure, by persuasion and the political process, their dream of a united Ireland.

In practice, unionists would have primacy within a Northern Ireland assembly, elected by proportional representation. But nationalist influence would be ensured by a system of committees covering departments of government and by in-built minority rights to veto legislation. A triumvirate - presumably James Molyneaux, Ian Paisley and John Hume or their successors - would oversee fair play. Cross-border institutions, bringing together northern and southern politicians to discuss matters of joint interest, would prevent Roman Catholics once more becoming isolated in a state from which they felt alienated. The quid pro quo would be an abandonment by the Irish Republic of its territorial claim to Northern Ireland.

There are sticks as well as carrots. The unionists would not be able to have an assembly unless they accepted the north-south links. There are also hints that if unionist politicians fail to co-operate, they might find that cross-border institutions are developed without them.

Boiled down, these ideas are at least 20 years old, reflecting Britain's now longstanding recognition that unionist hegemony can never deliver political stability. So why should they work now; where they failed in the past?

The fresh ingredient is peace. The cessation of violence suggests that extreme nationalists may have achieved a maturity that recognises the impossibility of bombing their way to a united Ireland. Also, the longer peace lasts, the greater is the chance that a beleaguered unionist community will open itself to dialogue and change. Anecdotally, there are signs that some people are becoming more flexible. They may surprise their political representatives. Those politicians who would try to wreck progress must recognise that the framework document could win majority support in a referendum even if some unionists oppose it. The Protestant community effectively retains a veto over Northern Ireland's constitutional status, but not over all political change.

John Major and John Bruton, the Irish premier, have thus designed a framework that will shock those unionists who fear that any change is another step down the slippery slope towards a united Ireland. Ulster unionists and their Powellite associates at Westminster will argue that the integrity of the United Kingdom must take precedence indefinitely, whatever the people of Northern Ireland desire. They also see any concession to the nationalists as a concession to violence. In both respects, they thus condemn Ulster to the half-life it has led for a quarter of a century.

They also shudder at the thought that beyond the tired nationalist agenda lies a different, European model. Like the EU, the cross-border bodies will involve some authority being pooled at a higher level. But the purpose is to build confidence between communities rather than to subordinate one to the other. Just as Britain has the right to prevent and ultimately stay out of a European federal superstate, so limits can be set on cross- border institutions. A united Ireland would be created only in the highly unlikely event of its constituents willing that outcome.

Since 1989 and the fall of communism, even the longest running and apparently most intractable problems have shown themselves capable of solution. Now, at last, it is Ulster's turn to find a settlement. This framework may have to be completed in a hurricane of rhetoric or worse, but it is the only workable structure available. It has been there in one blueprint or another for two decades: these are ideas whose time has come.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

KS2 Teaching Supply Wakefield

£140 - £160 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: Qualified KS2 Supply Teacher r...

Year 1/2 Teacher

£130 - £160 per day: Randstad Education Leeds: Qualified KS1 Teacher required,...

Primary Teachers Needed for Supply in Wakefield

£140 - £160 per annum: Randstad Education Leeds: Qualified KS1&2 Supply Te...

Corporate Commercial Solicitor

£45000 - £65000 per annum + Excellent: Austen Lloyd: Corporate Commercial Soli...

Day In a Page

Read Next
Residents of the Gravesham constituency are 10 times closer to what Peter Hain scorns as the “Westminster elite” than are those of Linlithgow and East Falkirk  

Will no one stop the march of localism?

Jonathan Meades
Scottish referendum: The Yes vote was the love that dared speak its name, but it was not to be

Despite the result, this is the end of the status quo

Boyd Tonkin on the fall-out from the Scottish referendum
Manolo Blahnik: The high priest of heels talks flats, Englishness, and why he loves Mary Beard

Manolo Blahnik: Flats, Englishness, and Mary Beard

The shoe designer who has been dubbed 'the patron saint of the stiletto'
The Beatles biographer reveals exclusive original manuscripts of some of the best pop songs ever written

Scrambled eggs and LSD

Behind The Beatles' lyrics - thanks to Hunter Davis's original manuscript copies
'Normcore' fashion: Blending in is the new standing out in latest catwalk non-trend

'Normcore': Blending in is the new standing out

Just when fashion was in grave danger of running out of trends, it only went and invented the non-trend. Rebecca Gonsalves investigates
Dance’s new leading ladies fight back: How female vocalists are now writing their own hits

New leading ladies of dance fight back

How female vocalists are now writing their own hits
Mystery of the Ground Zero wedding photo

A shot in the dark

Mystery of the wedding photo from Ground Zero
His life, the universe and everything

His life, the universe and everything

New biography sheds light on comic genius of Douglas Adams
Save us from small screen superheroes

Save us from small screen superheroes

Shows like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D are little more than marketing tools
Reach for the skies

Reach for the skies

From pools to football pitches, rooftop living is looking up
These are the 12 best hotel spas in the UK

12 best hotel spas in the UK

Some hotels go all out on facilities; others stand out for the sheer quality of treatments
These Iranian-controlled Shia militias used to specialise in killing American soldiers. Now they are fighting Isis, backed up by US airstrikes

Widespread fear of Isis is producing strange bedfellows

Iranian-controlled Shia militias that used to kill American soldiers are now fighting Isis, helped by US airstrikes
Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Topshop goes part Athena poster, part last spring Prada

Shoppers don't come to Topshop for the unique
How to make a Lego masterpiece

How to make a Lego masterpiece

Toy breaks out of the nursery and heads for the gallery
Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Meet the ‘Endies’ – city dwellers who are too poor to have fun

Urbanites are cursed with an acronym pointing to Employed but No Disposable Income or Savings
Paisley’s decision to make peace with IRA enemies might remind the Arabs of Sadat

Ian Paisley’s decision to make peace with his IRA enemies

His Save Ulster from Sodomy campaign would surely have been supported by many a Sunni imam