Let's float the fishing issue: There is a simple solution to tuna wars and fish stock depletion: privatise the high seas, says Nicholas Roe

Related Topics
NOW THAT we have all had the weekend in which to brood about the rights and wrongs of the Bay of Biscay tuna wars, maybe it is time to admit something to ourselves: fish disputes have gone off. They are stale. Old. Whiffy.

Each individual battle has its moments, of course. Piracy and mystery at sea always make good reading, and the idea of Spanish and English fishermen wrangling over who has got the biggest net is worth a smile, just as the threat of poverty underlying the whole dispute merits genuine concern.

Yet beneath the gloss of individual circumstance lies one single, wearying truth that cannot be ignored. In one form or another, we have heard all this before. Tuna, cod, haddock, herring, mesh size, quotas, boxes, boat size, days in port, days at sea . . . The words are like milestones in a journey that never ends, and still the wrangles keep coming, confusing us with points of law or geography while leaving the fundamental question apparently unanswered: when the fighting stops, will there be any fish left in the sea?

All right, forget the mind- numbing details flooding in from the Bay. Now is the time to ask whether a system that encourages so many tedious disputes is the right way to run an ocean at all. This is the real point raised by the tuna wars. Not: who has broken the rules? But: shouldn't we re- write the whole book?

At this point, you may feel that you are entering the dreary territory of blueprints for ocean-management and the Law of the Sea. The fact is, however, that one suggestion now gaining currency among marine experts is beautifully simple. Just this. We could privatise the sea. Put more formally, in the words of Dr James Muir, assistant director of the Institute of Aquaculture at the University of Stirling, who takes a keen observer's interest in the way we produce our fish, 'The long- term picture which I think will gradually emerge is going to be that of ownership of the stocks.'

That means nothing less than renting out slabs of water to the highest bidder and letting market forces rule the waves, just as they do - with safeguards - on land. And though this may sound like an ideological bandage slapped on to a wound of more complex needs, it is nothing of the kind.

Here is how it would work. In fact, here is how it does work in New Zealand, where licensing arrangements for coastal waters have successfully been in force for some years. You take a stretch of sea, say five miles by five, and as a government, or governmental club, you say to the market: 'Here is an area noted for this kind of fish in this kind of seasonal regularity. What am I bid?' Fishermen promptly go into a huddle and, either as co- operative groups or companies, they start making offers.

The bids would automatically balance all the complex factors which act on seafood markets: demand, competition, future stocks, and the extraordinary technological sophistication of modern fishing methods and their ability to suck up sea life almost at whim. Winners would emerge and licences would be granted for, say, five to ten years at a stretch.

It would then be up to individual licence holders to manage stocks as they see fit. They want to over-fish? Let them. Next year, or the year after, or the year after that they will discover the error of their ways because income would dip. At the first sign of mismanagement there would be an investor on site pulling up nets and sending boats back to port. They want to use tiny mesh size? The same rule would apply. If you own the sea - or, at least, its stocks - you would look after it because it is in your direct financial interest to do so. Even if you plan to stop fishing next year you might want to sell your holding, as shop-keepers do with leases: a ruined business has no value.

Opening up the seas to individual ownership would bring the fierce light of personal interest glaring on to the surface of the water. If you want a parallel, it is the abolition of the commons in rural England. The benefits would not only be sharper management but a more focused system of protest whenever the seas are abused. How do you think a licence holder would react if a ship dumped waste on privately owned cod stocks? Or if there were regular oil spills? Or if, say, port waste facilities were so bad or expensive that boats kept their junk for disposal in the open sea (which, as it happens, they often do)? It is easy to say how fishermen would react. With a writ.

Yes, you might say, it is fine to talk of managed waters, but who is to know what happens out there in the vast blue sea? Well, just for once, technology - which has done so much harm to fish stocks in recent years - could work for the ocean's well-being. As Dr Muir points out, this is the age of satellites. Bleeps or bar codes could link a licence holder to a specific area, and pirates be identified because they emit the wrong signal. Who polices the waves? Locally, Europe. Or if that is too grim a prospect for sceptics, take the private answer just as they do on land. Perhaps we could stick Securicor in a boat and punt its officers out to sea.

There would be ethical problems to overcome, of course. And you would have to know exactly what you were selling when offering a licence: specifically fish rather than leisure space or oil or gas or sunken treasure. But think how many eyes would fix upon mineral prospectors when they turned seaward in this new watery futureworld. The last great wilderness would be crammed with witnesses ready to howl if the slightest thing went wrong: not on a theoretical basis, but for here, now and this bit of sea.

You would have to curb market forces in order to look after small, vulnerable fishing communities that do not have even the power of co-ops to protect them. You would also need to guard against the perils of mass ownership - bass barons, that sort of thing. All sorts of troubles might bubble to the surface if one person owned the sea. Water lords would have to be controlled just as they are - or ought to be - in other areas.

Drinking water is already in private ownership, and anyway the simplicity of licensed oceans makes the idea highly attractive. In a sense, it is injecting the sobering value of property into an activity that has been too free, too long. We are just too good at hunting, too bad at managing hunters. Fish farmers have tended to show the way. Any problems in that industry are dealt with by those whose pockets are most affected when things go wrong: the owners themselves. Admittedly a few wildcats indulge in 'slash and burn' style aquaculture - farming until conditions become intolerable and then moving on - but by and large the industry has a grip of its own destiny.

Fishermen should do the same and can, with licences. Far from losing sight of the sea's long-term value, those whose job it is to plunder this natural resource could take a detailed, small-scale view of their own backyard if it was theirs to look after. And this, of course, is the point at which the whole debate began. Tuna wars start when men in boats a long way from view try to observe, or bend, rules made by well-meaning politicians and scientists back on land. It doesn't work. Controlled self-interest does. Open up the seas. Give the fish a chance.

(Photographs omitted)

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Application Support - Enterprise Java, SQL, Oracle, SQL Server

£45000 - £55000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A well-established financial soft...

Service Desk Analyst (Graduate, Helpdesk, Desktop, Surrey)

Negotiable: Harrington Starr: Service Desk Analyst (Graduate, Helpdesk, Deskto...

Service Desk Analyst (Graduate, Helpdesk, Desktop, Surrey)

Negotiable: Harrington Starr: Service Desk Analyst (Graduate, Helpdesk, Deskto...

Junior Quant Analyst - C++, Boost, Data Mining

£25000 - £35000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Junior Quant Analyst - C++, Boost...

Day In a Page

Read Next

August catch-up: architecture, suitcases and ‘pathetic figures’

John Rentoul
Mosul dam was retaken with the help of the US  

Air strikes? Talk of God? Barack Obama is following the jihadists’ script after James Foley beheading

Robert Fisk
Air strikes? Talk of God? Obama is following the jihadists’ script

Air strikes? Talk of God? Obama is following the jihadists’ script

The President came the nearest he has come yet to rivalling George W Bush’s gormless reaction to 9/11 , says Robert Fisk
Ebola outbreak: Billy Graham’s son declares righteous war on the virus

Billy Graham’s son declares righteous war on Ebola

A Christian charity’s efforts to save missionaries trapped in Africa by the crisis have been justifiably praised. But doubts remain about its evangelical motives
Jeremy Clarkson 'does not see a problem' with his racist language on Top Gear, says BBC

Not even Jeremy Clarkson is bigger than the BBC, says TV boss

Corporation’s head of television confirms ‘Top Gear’ host was warned about racist language
Nick Clegg the movie: Channel 4 to air Coalition drama showing Lib Dem leader's rise

Nick Clegg the movie

Channel 4 to air Coalition drama showing Lib Dem leader's rise
Philip Larkin: Misogynist, racist, miserable? Or caring, playful man who lived for others?

Philip Larkin: What will survive of him?

Larkin's reputation has taken a knocking. But a new book by James Booth argues that the poet was affectionate, witty, entertaining and kind, as hitherto unseen letters, sketches and 'selfies' reveal
Madame Tussauds has shown off its Beyoncé waxwork in Regent's Park - but why is the tourist attraction still pulling in the crowds?

Waxing lyrical

Madame Tussauds has shown off its Beyoncé waxwork in Regent's Park - but why is the tourist attraction still pulling in the crowds?
Texas forensic astronomer finally pinpoints the exact birth of impressionism

Revealed (to the minute)

The precise time when impressionism was born
From slow-roasted to sugar-cured: how to make the most of the British tomato season

Make the most of British tomatoes

The British crop is at its tastiest and most abundant. Sudi Pigott shares her favourite recipes
10 best men's skincare products

Face it: 10 best men's skincare products

Oscar Quine cleanses, tones and moisturises to find skin-savers blokes will be proud to display on the bathroom shelf
Malky Mackay allegations: Malky Mackay, Iain Moody and another grim day for English football

Mackay, Moody and another grim day for English football

The latest shocking claims do nothing to dispel the image that some in the game on these shores exist in a time warp, laments Sam Wallace
La Liga analysis: Will Barcelona's hopes go out of the window?

Will Barcelona's hopes go out of the window?

Pete Jenson starts his preview of the Spanish season, which begins on Saturday, by explaining how Fifa’s transfer ban will affect the Catalans
Middle East crisis: We know all too much about the cruelty of Isis – but all too little about who they are

We know all too much about the cruelty of Isis – but all too little about who they are

Now Obama has seen the next US reporter to be threatened with beheading, will he blink, asks Robert Fisk
Neanderthals lived alongside humans for centuries, latest study shows

Final resting place of our Neanderthal neighbours revealed

Bones dated to 40,000 years ago show species may have died out in Belgium species co-existed
Scottish independence: The new Scots who hold fate of the UK in their hands

The new Scots who hold fate of the UK in their hands

Scotland’s immigrants are as passionate about the future of their adopted nation as anyone else
Britain's ugliest buildings: Which monstrosities should be nominated for the Dead Prize?

Blight club: Britain's ugliest buildings

Following the architect Cameron Sinclair's introduction of the Dead Prize, an award for ugly buildings, John Rentoul reflects on some of the biggest blots on the UK landscape