Letter: Dogma in the use of apostrophes

Click to follow
The Independent Online
Sir: The correct use of the apostrophe is indeed complex, as William Powell says (Letters, 27 April); he is surely wrong to be so dogmatic in dismissing your earlier correspondent Stephen Thomas's complaint that 'Forces Sweetheart' (an exhibition at the Imperial War Museum) lacks an apostrophe.

Mr Powell's analogies are false. In 'soldier boy', the boy is not (usually) the boy of a soldier: he is a soldier; whereas the forces' sweetheart is the sweetheart of the forces. Again, in 'Army, Navy and Airforce Sweethearts', army, navy etc are standard adjectival nouns. Moreover, all Mr Powell's examples exemplify the tendency of adjectival nouns to be singular (cf 'Girl Guides').

A good test in doubtful plural possessives is to substitute an irregular plural. A true and useful analogy would then be 'children's favourite': one might conceivably say 'the child's favourite', but never 'children favourite'. The forces' sweetheart needs its - her - apostrophe. And you, sir, should take 100 lines for dubbing this a matter of punctuation rather than spelling.

Yours faithfully,


Literary Editor

Classical Division

EMI Records (UK)

London, W1

30 April