Neither - given the huge disparity in equipment - can I fathom your confident judgment that the Bosnians 'have been . . . out-generaled and outfought'. One might as well say that the Hungarians were 'out-generaled' in 1956. Are you trying to suggest that the Bosnian government deserves to suffer the truncation of its country?
Perhaps you could also explain why you accuse the Bosnian Prime Minister of 'sloganeering'. Is it because he continues to castigate the West for abandoning Bosnia to aggression, ethnic cleansing and dismemberment? As for 'squander(ing) Western sympathy', surely the Bosnian government has already done that by defying all predictions and refusing to curl up and die, or submit to a diktat peace?
The belated lifting of the arms embargo, provided it is accompanied by continued Nato air cover, is necessary to enable the Bosnian government to defeat Serbian aggression, or at least to force some kind of just settlement.
Of course, this will involve more fighting as the Bosnian government tries to reclaim land lost while fighting for two years while Western European governments tied their hands behind their back with an unjust arms embargo, and prevented the Americans from coming to their aid.
The blame for the coming bloodshed should therefore be placed squarely on those who have hitherto consistently blocked all attempts by the Bosnian government to defend itself.
12 SeptemberReuse content