Letter: Jury reform

Click to follow
Sir: Having just completed jury service, I agree with Valerie and Martin Hewitt (letter, 11 November) that the present system is unsatisfactory, but I would not agree that all jurors should be lay magistrates. I would prefer a combination of professionals and members of the public. This would have been beneficial.

A suggestion made by a member of our jury was that there should be a period of jurors' question time before retirement, when the jury could ask questions of judge and counsel.

One jury member felt she was too young to make the necessary decisions; perhaps there should be a lower age limit of 30.


Sidcup, Kent