Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Letter: Oxford and the 'tainted cash' row

Peter North
Wednesday 24 April 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Sir: In your editorial on the Flick benefaction to the University of Oxford ("The Flick fiasco", 18 April) you attempt to discredit the university on the grounds of hand-wringing and inconsistency.

The facts are that when concern was expressed about the benefaction the matter was, at once, fully investigated, and the university took the view that the money was not tainted and that it was entirely proper to retain it.

The university has not in any way retreated from that view, as Dr Gert- Rudolf Flick himself acknowledged publicly. The title was removed from the chair, and the funding was returned to the donor, only at the personal request of Dr Flick himself, following a deplorable campaign of vilification. The university remains very grateful to Dr Flick for his initial support.

Dr Peter North

Vice-Chancellor

University Offices

Oxford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in