LETTER: The long-term generation game

Mr David Warrick
Friday 07 April 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

From Mr David Warrick

Sir: Hamish McRae ("And shall our children inherit the deficit?" 6 April) expresses the widely held view that a government deficit has to be "paid for" by future generations. This is surely a misconception. A government deficit will require a transfer of funds, within a future generation, from taxpayers to savers/lenders. The future generation of taxpayers will not be paying the current generation of lenders but their descendants in the "future generation".

The only meaningful way in which one generation pays for another is in long-life projects, such as infrastructure or housing, where the earlier generation is paying for the succeeding generation. This is probably the main reason why, in practical terms, most generations are better off than their predecessors, and societies that invest heavily in reasonably useful projects do particularly well.

However, I don't think large deficits are a good idea, because they will be tough on future taxpayers.

Yours etc,

DAVID WARRICK

Cranbrook, Kent

7 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in