- Tuesday 21 May 2013
- My Account
- Logout
- Register
- Login
- News
-
Voices
-
Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Terence Blacker
- Chris Blackhurst
- David Blanchflower
- Archie Bland
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Laura Davis
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Philip Hensher
- Ian Herbert
- Howard Jacobson
- Ellen E Jones
- Alice Jones
- Owen Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Dominic Lawson
- Donald Macintyre
- Lisa Markwell
- Comment
- Campaigns
- Debate
- Editorials
- Letters
- IV Drip
- Archive
- Our Voices
- Commentators
- Columnists
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
-
Find by writer
- Sport
- Tech
- Life
- Property
- Arts & Ents
- Travel
- Money
- IndyBest
- Blogs
- Student
Sir: Charles Arthur's claim that British Energy's decision to abandon the proposed Sizewell C and Hinkley C nuclear reactors is bad for the UK economy (Analysis; "Nuclear pull-out poses threat to the economy", 12 December) ignores some simple economic facts.
Far from justifying its existence in the public sector, nuclear power was killed because it cannot survive without massive public subsidy. The Government's May 1995 White Paper, The Prospects for Nuclear Power, made it transparently clear that there are no strategic, industrial or environmental arguments which can be substantiated to justify such continued subsidy.
Quite simply, every billion pounds spent subsidising a new nuclear power station is a billion pounds that could be spent more cost-effectively elsewhere. Pound for pound, investment in energy efficiency can lead to twice as many jobs created as investment in nuclear power. Energy efficiency is a far more cost-effective way of combating climate change than nuclear power.
In the medium to long term, renewable energy offers a more sustainable and cost-effective means of meeting the UK energy's needs without the environmental impact of fossil-fuel burning or nuclear power. Wind energy is already cheaper than nuclear power and does not produce a legacy of nuclear waste that will remain hazardous for timescales transcending human experience.
New nuclear power stations will only add to the nation's existing legacy of nuclear waste for which no permanent solution exists. The new station would produce radioactive waste during its operating life and would need to be decommissioned at the end of it, or some 50-100 years thereafter. The UK's nuclear waste management and decommissioning bill currently stands at around pounds 40bn.
Continued investment in nuclear power would therefore be distinctly bad for the UK economy and is not necessary. It is time to wake up from the nuclear dream, Mr Arthur.
Yours sincerely
Patrick Green
Senior Energy
Nuclear and Climate
Campaigner
Friends of the Earth
London, N1
12 December
-
Letters: Of course big business loves the EU
-
Internet porn is no kind of education, but LOLcats and Tumblr (almost) make up for it
-
The so-called 'Robin Hood Tax' will rob pensioners and small businesses not just bankers
-
Voices in Danger: In Pakistan, state brutality makes journalism a dangerous business
-
Could Northern Ireland host the next Hollywood?
-
For Google, This World is Not Enough
Get your summer started with British Military Fitness
BMF is the UK’s biggest and best loved outdoor fitness classes
Visit York
Find out what The Independent's resident travel expert has to say about one of the most beautiful small cities in the world
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Related Articles
Get the best in opinion from Independent Voices, straight to your inbox every Thursday lunchtime.
Subscribe
Amol Rajan
A weekly update from the Editor
iJobs General
Science Teacher
£21000 - £36000 per annum: Randstad Education Crawley: We are currently recrui...
Food Technology Teacher
£21000 - £36000 per annum: Randstad Education Crawley: We are currently recrui...
2nd in Charge of English (with Media Studies)
£21000 - £36000 per annum: Randstad Education Crawley: We are recruiting for a...
2nd In Charge of English/Head of Department
£21000 - £35000 per annum: Randstad Education Crawley: Qualified English Teach...
Day In a Page
The price of pacifism
Jason Isaacs: Groupies, theatre bores and James Bond
Sealand: 'Micronation' or illegal fortress?
Legend of James Hunt has set Hollywood hearts racing
Macklemore: 'I don't have moderation'
