Letters: AV campaigns

Share
Related Topics

On 5 May, for the first time, we have the chance to decide how we want to elect our MPs. The choice is a simple one: let things carry on as they are, or vote to give us all more choice, a more powerful vote and more say over how this country is governed .

A just and effective democracy should involve and reflect the needs of the entire population. With the Alternative Vote we will see an end to the days when elections are decided by minorities in marginal seats. Candidates will have to reach out to more members of the community and address a wider set of issues.

This kind of inclusive, consensual politics is good for women – from those who want to serve their country to those who want to create a fairer, more progressive democracy. Women currently make up just 22 per cent of MPs. First-Past-the-Post discourages female electoral representation. It has to go.

Everyone should have a voice and everyone should be able to play an active role in the democratic life of our country. To stand for office, to have their voices heard, to make their vote count. For everyone who has ever railed against or felt excluded by our current political system, 5 May is the chance to change things.

Alexandra Shulman Editor of Vogue

Amisha Ghadiali Ethical fashion designer and vice-chair of Yes to Fairer Votes

Ann Limb Charity entrepreneur, educationist, business leader

Carol Lake Investment banker

Caroline Lucas MP Green party leader

Daisy de Villenueve Illustrator

Francesca Martinez Comedian

Gabrielle Rifkind Director of Middle East Human Security Programme, Oxford Research Group

Gillian Slovo Author and screenwriter

Glenys Kinnock Politician

Helena Kennedy Human rights lawyer

Hilary Wainwright Editor of Red Pepper

Isabel Hilton Journalist and broadcaster

Prof Jacqueline Rose Professor of English, Queen Mary, University of London

Jay Griffiths Award-winning writer

Joan Bakewell Journalist and broadcaster

Joanna Lumley Actress

Josie Long Comedian

Judith Wanga Writer/documentary maker

Julia Neuberger Rabbi, social reformer and member of the House of Lords

Juliette Stevenson Actress

Katie Ghose Chair of Yes to Fairer Votes

Larissa Wilson Actress

Lindsay Mackie Consultant, New Economics Foundation

Lisa Appignanesi Author

Lisa Forrell Director

Lynne Franks Entrepreneur

Lynne Parker Founder of Funny Women

Marina Warner Writer

Nina Kowalska Campaigner

Oona King Labour politician

Pam Giddy Chair of the Yes to Fairer Votes advisory council

Patsy Puttnam Fashion designer

Polly Toynbee Journalist

Prof Janet Todd President of Lady Cavendish College, Cambridge

Rosie Boycott Journalist and Campaigner

Rowan Davies Writer, editor and vice-chair of Yes to Fairer Votes

Sara Parkin Founder director of Forum for the Future

Seema Maholtra Fabian Women's Network

Servane Mouazan Social entrepreneur

Sian Berry Writer and campaigner

Solitaire Townsend Co-director, Futerra Sustainability Communications

Sue Hollick Businesswoman

Susan Nash Chair of Young Labour

Susan Richards Author and editor

Tamsin Omond Activist and environmentalist

Tessa Tennant Financial consultant, chair of Global Cool, executive chair of Ice

Timberlake Wertenbaker Writer

Victoria Brittain Journalist

Vivienne Westwood Fashion Designer

Wendy Savage Gynaecologist and campaigner

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown Journalist

As a visiting expert in the Australian political system I have been astonished at the disinformation being spread by the AV "No" campaign. If droves are going to stay away from the polling booths because they find AV confusing, then Britons must be substantially less intelligent than Australians.

Australians are not confused by AV. Even my local football club has adopted preferential voting (AV) for office-bearers. And don't the punters use AV on Big Brother, voting out the least favoured contestant and then allocating their votes to the remaining ones?

Then there is the porky about Australians being opposed to their AV system. Well, that's news to me, and every other political analyst. After nearly a century of AV there is no opposition to it in Australia. It is simply not an issue because it's seen to be fair and it works. A century of voting under AV has given rise to no political instability in Australia. Quite the reverse: it gives those disgruntled with the main parties a meaningful outlet.

Between them the two main parties have been able to attract an overwhelming majority of votes. In recent years, disillusionment with the main parties – which now compete through spin rather then substance because their ideologies converged in the 1980s – has created the conditions in which the greater fairness of AV will come into its own, because a vote for a third party counts.

Any Briton who has voted for a third party or might consider doing so in the future will disenfranchise themselves if they vote "No" on Thursday.

Professor Clive Hamilton

Department of Philosophy

University of Oxford



Assuming my choice of representative is eliminated in the first round, in what sense does being allowed to vote for someone I do not want to represent me make my vote count? Already, with FPTP, if I know that my preferred candidate has no chance, I am free to give my vote to the least hated of the alternatives. Only if some form of proportional representation was on offer would every vote count.

If I was asked to choose between a cuff to the ear and a kick up the backside, I would abstain. And this is what I will do on Thursday.

Keith Barlow

Brighton



Rupert Read (letter, 27 April) says that no one knows what effect AV would have on the Liberal Democrats. Well, presumably the Lib Dems must think it would work in their favour since the referendum was the one non-negotiable term of the coalition agreement while other policies were jettisoned.

Even if AV did not have a radical effect and they only increased their strength in Parliament to (say) 90 or 100, it would be that much harder for either of the other main parties to secure a majority on its own. The Lib Dems would then have a good chance of being king-makers with a veto on policy and seats in Cabinet.

If that is the sort of system of government you want, by all means vote for AV. If you want to be sure of being able to throw a government out with no chance of it getting a last-minute lifeline, better stick to the present method.

Gordon Elliot

Burford, Oxfordshire



For electing a parliament that is representative of the electorate as a whole, our present First-Past-The-Post voting system (FPTP) and the proposed Alternative Vote (AV) are about as useless as each other.

For electing individual representatives in seats where one candidate gets more votes than all the others combined FPTP and AV produce the same result.

For electing individual representatives in all other seats, however, AV is more democratic than FPTP because with AV more voters will be represented by someone that they helped to elect.

That is why I'll be voting Yes to AV.

Charlie Pearcy

Cardiff



The campaign has gotten ridiculous. The lies coming out of the No camp have got so bad that I'm almost expecting to hear them say that AV causes global warming and increases the risk of cancer.

Jay Thompson

Newcastle upon Tyne

AV is neither more fair nor less fair; it is just different. It is primarily for the voter who wishes to vote against a particular candidate – tactical voting without the need for tactics. In FPTP the voter votes for a candidate or party he or she prefers and the rest are nowhere. AV is negative politics; FPTP is positive politics. That is the nub of the matter; all the rest is posturing.

Michael Baum

Ilford, Essex



The No campaign says that we can't afford £250m for a fairer voting system. Even if that hotly disputed figure were true it is less than the sum 25 bankers paid themselves in bonuses last year. It's less than 3 per cent of the cost of the Olympics. It's a fraction of the money this country has paid to bring democracy to distant lands, and yet we can't afford it here?

Anthony Hentschel

Nailsworth, Gloucestershire



The AV campaign has been depressingly dominated by fringe issues. The central issue is that under the current system, candidates with less than 30 per cent of the vote can be declared to be winners.

Suppose that an appointing panel consisting of 12 members is choosing between four candidates for a job, and at the first round the preferences are A,4; B,3; C,3; D,2. No such panel would cease deliberations at this point and declare A the winner.

Graham Jameson

Lancaster



Bin Laden in the wrong country



With the death of Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan, it would seem that the 10-year hunt for him and his al-Qa'ida supporters in Afghanistan has been conducted in the wrong country. The death of Bin Laden is a cause for some brief satisfaction that this cold-blooded, mass murderer has been finally brought to account. However, finding him in Pakistan leads to a number of key questions.

The conflict in Afghanistan has, so far, cost the lives of 364 UK soldiers. Who exactly have we been fighting for the past 10 years in that country, and why? Certainly the Taliban are a very unpleasant bunch, but no more than many other misogynist religious fanatics. And they have never posed a direct threat to the UK.

To what extent are the "insurgents" whom we continue to fight in Afghanistan simply local tribesmen intent on throwing out a foreign invader, supplemented by young foreign jihadists, attracted to the conflict by a western presence in a Muslim country? Is our presence in the country now actually the major cause of the conflict there?

How many more UK families are to lose a loved one in our military support of a corrupt Kabul regime trying to establish its rule over the disparate tribal regions that comprise Afghanistan?

Do we now need to review our relationship with Pakistan, given that this country, which is happy to accept western aid, is now revealed to have been acting as a host to those intent on our destruction?

Alan Stedall

Birmingham



"Justice has been done." The words of President Obama were echoed by millions around the world. However we must not forget the price of that "justice".

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, the US government had two possible responses. The first was the cool, calm and rational response that it would track down all those responsible for this act of mass murder, and bring them to justice. The second was the declaration of "war", and the visceral call for military retaliation.

It chose the latter, revenge not justice, ignoring an offer by the Taliban to hand Bin Laden over to a neutral country. The result was that more innocent Afghan civilians died in bombing of their country in 2001/02, than Americans died in 9/11.

Who cares about the deaths of a few thousand Afghans now the US have "got their man"?

Dr Shazad Amin

Sale, Greater Manchester



Over recent years the media has shown images of joyous celebration in parts of the Arab world, as a reaction to some death or atrocity in the West. Usually this receives negative comment in the western media.

Now, following Bin Laden's death, we see the streets of Washington flooded with a mob, waving flags and chanting "USA, USA". Is that an appropriate response to an operation that looks like Wild West justice rather than considered, legal due process, – one of the values we are at war to defend?

Nick Andell

Creaton, Northamptonshire

Schoolboy's illegal flutter



Stan Hey's feature on betting shops (29 April) took me back to my childhood in a west London tenement when I used to watch my father studying form in the newspapers and filling out his betting slip, which he always signed DD (for Dirty Dick) and then took to the illegal bookie a couple of streets away.

In 1954 I was allowed to have a flutter on the Grand National with some of my pocket money. I chose a horse called Royal Tan, which won and earned me 12s (60p). I was ordered to put the winnings in the school National Savings stamps scheme on the strict instruction that I wasn't to tell the teacher how I came by the money.

Clive Goozee

Bournemouth



Mystery on the Sussex coast



What is The Independent trying to do with poor old England? On Saturday (30 April) your Concise Crossword carried the clue, "Former Northern county (9 letters)", to which the answer turned out to be "Yorkshire". Former – really?

And on Monday, the round-up of British weather showed the royal burgh of Bognor Regis enjoying absolutely no weather at all: no rainfall, no hours of sun, no temperature (neither Fahrenheit nor Celsius). What is occurring? Is some scientific experiment taking place, which involves placing Bognor within a non-atmospheric cocoon?

Or could it be that Bognor is the answer to feverish speculation about the princely honeymoon, necessitating such a tight news blackout that not even the town's temperature can be revealed? Are a "Mr and Mrs Cambridge" booked into a modest seaside B&B, perhaps trying to make amends for the slur supposedly cast upon the blameless Sussex resort by the dying words of the bridegroom's great-great-grandfather?

C Sladen

Woodstock, Oxfordshire



Catholic Church homophobia



Tom McIntyre (letter, 30 April) gives the standard answer to the charge against the Catholic Church of homophobia: all extramarital sex is wrong but conscience is supreme. That is not all the Church says about homosexuality.

Homosexual orientation (not practice) is a bar to ordination, by an instruction of the Congregation for Catholic Education given on 4 November 2005.

In a formal statement of the Church's position on civil partnerships issued by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger on 3 June 2003, he (as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) wrote: "Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children."

That is at best a grotesque exaggeration, at worst a lie. It is, to my certain knowledge founded in personal experience, false. It is in my view homophobic and inexcusable.

Bernard O'Sullivan

London SW8



Public interest



The news media really should get its priorities right. I opened my paper yesterday to be greeted with reports of the death of the most dangerous terrorist in the world and the death of one of the best boxers this country has ever produced. Not a single word about what side of the marital bed William had slept on, or what Kate had had for breakfast. Please try and keep up with the public's needs.

Michael O'Connor

Morden, Surrey



Berlin sparrows



I recently visited Berlin and was amazed at the number of sparrows in the city centre. I also observed that many of the trees were full of clumps of mistletoe. Is there any connection between the two?

Viv Pert

London N8

Perspectives after the royal wedding

Sacrificed to the people's fears



Stephen Glover ("Royal spinners have unleashed a monster", 2 May) is right to feel sorry for William and Kate. We should all feel sorry that another young couple should be destined to suffer a life of unremitting media and public exposure.

Their future as human individuals is to be sacrificed at the altar of an idea of public service that requires a hostage family, set apart as a talisman against society's existential fears and anxieties. To survive we seem to demand continual assurance of a transcendent context for our lives, that there is something (someone) timeless and other, hovering protectively "over and above" our own ignorant and hapless struggles – beyond our powers to corrupt.

The Royal Family survives to help supply that atavistic need. If they are to continue to do so we must take proper care of them. I am moved to embrace the republican cause, not as a matter of democratic principle but purely by feelings of humanity. There must be another way.

Malcolm Ross

Littlehempston, Devon

Family will stand them in good stead



The Middletons were the real stars of Friday's televised wedding celebrations.

Pippa, Kate's sister, both organised the bridal train with efficient precision and had a winning way with the younger attendants. James, her brother, delivered the Bible reading in such a way as to give it meaning for the millions of viewers. The bride's mother, Carole, had chosen a dress which although stylish was sure not to upstage the royal party. And when Michael came to give his precious daughter to be married he was humble and accepting.

The slight smile that Kate slipped to her parents during the address displayed a bond which will stand her and William in good stead throughout their coming marriage. They may need the cushioning of wisdom, stability and understanding which the Middletons have. William has made a good choice.

Fiona Wilson

Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire

Launch of new cultural icons



One of the reasons I started taking The Independent was because, unlike the majority of titles, it has the courage to "go it alone" with its front page story. Last Saturday's was an imaginative case in point. I was surprised to see some correspondents (2 May ) slagging it off. Tracey Emin's "The Kiss" was a superb work that monarchist and republican alike could admire. And, as former students of the history of art, I'll wager the newlyweds would think so too.

Colin Brent

Launceston, Cornwall



I hope Austerity Britain is embracing its new cultural icon - little Grace van Cutsem. At no extra cost, she did as much as one cherub could to recreate Raphael's Sistine Madonna on the Buckingham Palace balcony, and upstaged Tracey Emin while she was at it. I look forward to her second exhibition.

Anita Howard

Passage West, Co Cork, Ireland

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Pre-Press / Mac Operator / Artworker - Digital & Litho Print

Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: With year on year growth and a reputation for ...

Recruitment Genius: Project Manager - Live Virtual Training / Events

£24000 - £28000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Project Manager is required t...

SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant

£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE: SThree: SThree Group has been well establishe...

SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant

£18000 - £23000 per annum + OTE: SThree: SThree Group has been well establishe...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

FIFA awarded the World Cup to a state where slavery is actively facilitated

Aidan McQuade
 

The strange absence of women on our cultural landscape, and what I decided to do about it

Sian Norris
The difference between America and Israel? There isn’t one

The difference between America and Israel? There isn’t one

Netanyahu knows he can get away with anything in America, says Robert Fisk
Families clubbing together to build their own affordable accommodation

Do It Yourself approach to securing a new house

Community land trusts marking a new trend for taking the initiative away from developers
Head of WWF UK: We didn’t send Cameron to the Arctic to see green ideas freeze

David Nussbaum: We didn’t send Cameron to the Arctic to see green ideas freeze

The head of WWF UK remains sanguine despite the Government’s failure to live up to its pledges on the environment
Author Kazuo Ishiguro on being inspired by shoot-outs and samurai

Author Kazuo Ishiguro on being inspired by shoot-outs and samurai

Set in a mythologised 5th-century Britain, ‘The Buried Giant’ is a strange beast
With money, corruption and drugs, this monk fears Buddhism in Thailand is a ‘poisoned fruit’

Money, corruption and drugs

The monk who fears Buddhism in Thailand is a ‘poisoned fruit’
America's first slavery museum established at Django Unchained plantation - 150 years after slavery outlawed

150 years after it was outlawed...

... America's first slavery museum is established in Louisiana
Kelly Clarkson: How I snubbed Simon Cowell and become a Grammy-winning superstar

Kelly Clarkson: How I snubbed Simon Cowell and become a Grammy-winning superstar

The first 'American Idol' winner on how she manages to remain her own woman – Jane Austen fascination and all
Tony Oursler on exploring our uneasy relationship with technology with his new show

You won't believe your eyes

Tony Oursler's new show explores our uneasy relationship with technology. He's one of a growing number of artists with that preoccupation
Ian Herbert: Peter Moores must go. He should never have been brought back to fail again

Moores must go. He should never have been brought back to fail again

The England coach leaves players to find solutions - which makes you wonder where he adds value, says Ian Herbert
War with Isis: Fears that the looming battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

The battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

Aid agencies prepare for vast exodus following planned Iraqi offensive against the Isis-held city, reports Patrick Cockburn
Yvette Cooper: We can't lose the election. There's too much on the line

Yvette Cooper: We can't lose the election. There's too much on the line

The shadow Home Secretary on fighting radical Islam, protecting children, and why anyone in Labour who's thinking beyond May must 'sort themselves out'
A bad week for the Greens: Leader Natalie Bennett's 'car crash' radio interview is followed by Brighton council's failure to set a budget due to infighting

It's not easy being Green

After a bad week in which its leader had a public meltdown and its only city council couldn't agree on a budget vote, what next for the alternative party? It's over to Caroline Lucas to find out
Gorillas nearly missed: BBC producers didn't want to broadcast Sir David Attenborough's famed Rwandan encounter

Gorillas nearly missed

BBC producers didn't want to broadcast Sir David Attenborough's famed Rwandan encounter
Downton Abbey effect sees impoverished Italian nobles inspired to open their doors to paying guests for up to €650 a night

The Downton Abbey effect

Impoverished Italian nobles are opening their doors to paying guests, inspired by the TV drama
China's wild panda numbers have increased by 17% since 2003, new census reveals

China's wild panda numbers on the up

New census reveals 17% since 2003