Find by writer
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Rebecca Armstrong
- Memphis Barker
- Max Benwell
- Chris Blackhurst
- Ian Burrell
- Andrew Buncombe
- Ben Chu
- Patrick Cockburn
- Mary Dejevsky
- Grace Dent
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Stefano Hatfield
- Lucy Hunter Johnston
- Howard Jacobson
- Alice Jones
- Ellen E Jones
- Simon Kelner
- Lisa Markwell
- Michael McCarthy
- Hamish McRae
- Jane Merrick
- James Moore
- Matthew Norman
- Dom Joly
- Amol Rajan
- Happy List
- Our Voices
- Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
- Terence Blacker
- Simon Carr
- Rupert Cornwell
- Sloane Crosley
- Mary Dejevsky
- Robert Fisk
- Andrew Grice
- Adrian Hamilton
- Philip Hensher
- Howard Jacobson
- Dominic Lawson
- John Lichfield
- Hamish McRae
- Matthew Norman
- Christina Patterson
- John Rentoul
- Democracy 2015
- IV Drip Archive
- If I were PM
- Scottish independence
- Save the tiger
- The state of the NHS
- Find by writer
- Arts + Ents
Wednesday 7 April 2010
Letters: Fixed terms for Parliament
British democracy goes its own unpredictable way
You report that the Cabinet is considering fixed terms for Parliament. How deeply have they considered the full implications of such a move?
Consider what might had happened if President Obama had lost his bid for a reformed health service. By all accounts he would have been almost incapacitated for the rest of his fixed term – the best part of four years. But if the American system had been more like ours, there might have been an immediate election.
The flexibility in lengths of parliaments, and hence of governments, is one of the most important features of our democratic system and its loss would be serious as the loss of one-member constituencies if a fully proportional pattern of voting were introduced. I trust that the Labour party will not be crazy enough to include a commitment to fixed terms in it manifesto.
David W Lloyd
Local councils are not the only accurate predictors of the general election date (letter, 6 April). In February I replaced my boiler under the Government's scrappage scheme. The rebate voucher from the Energy Saving Trust mysteriously had an expiry date of 6 May, even though that date had no relation to when I applied for the rebate or the date it was issued. Were they trying to tell me something?
West Wittering, West Sussex
Bed and breakfast for gay couples
The homophobic comments made by Chris Grayling not only raise the issue of illegal homophobia seemingly being tolerated by the Conservative Party, but also the greater issue of why religious groups feel they should be permitted to discriminate illegally against specific groups in society.
Following a religion is a lifestyle choice, basically a hobby. Age, disability, gender, race and sexuality, the five categories against which it is illegal to discriminate in this country, are not lifestyle choices, they are natural human conditions. It is completely unacceptable for any group who choose to follow a religion to be allowed to break the law by discrimination.
I choose to follow a religion, which I celebrate openly with other followers on a regular basis – it is supporting my football team. If we were ever to discriminate against one particular group we would quite rightly be prosecuted. If it is unacceptable for the BNP to discriminate on the basis of race, it must be unacceptable for church or religious groups to do likewise on the basis of sexuality.
Worthing, West Sussex
It is high time religious organisations realised that religious liberty is not the same thing as the right to discriminate.
The Human Rights Act upholds the right to hold religious beliefs and manifest such belief "subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others" (article 9). Under the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations of 2007, it is illegal to refuse goods and services on the grounds of sexuality.
Christians who complain that their liberty is threatened are entirely missing the point. No one is forcing them to open a B&B. The moment they advertise and open their doors to the public, however, it is the public as a whole that they are open to.
What is the difference between refusing bed and breakfast to a black couple and a "harmless" gay couple (Johann Hari, 5 April)?
The colour of a person's skin is not moral behaviour. To be gay is behaviour about which a moral judgment has to be made. Hence the qualification, "harmless".
The real question is, in a democracy, how much freedom should people be allowed to decide who they have in their own homes (not hotels). Should not a liberal society necessarily allow conscientious, and rational, difference of opinion about moral behaviour to be expressed and acted on?
R W Standing
East Preston, Sussex
What with his support for householders who beat up fleeing intruders and for B&B proprietors who flout anti-discrimination laws, Chris Grayling would seem to have a strange attitude to abiding by the law, for someone who aspires to be the next Home Secretary. I wonder if he will be as sympathetic to those who commit crimes in the name of principles that are less in tune with his own?
Newcastle upon Tyne
In my experience most B&B double rooms contain two single beds, and one double room is cheaper than two single ones. If two females or two males book a double room, who is to know they are homosexual unless they themselves make it obvious (such as by requesting a room with double bed). Surely two friends may share a room. What they do inside it is entirely their own affair.
Newcastle upon Tyne
Chris Grayling should be allowed, if not encouraged, to continue in his current post. It is through such unwitting candour that the prevailing beliefs at his party's core are revealed.
Crazy ban on Iraqi artists
The lunatic exclusion of Iraqi artists from visiting Britain for an exhibition (report, 3 April) is a trivial but illuminating example of how excessive immigration restrictions are seriously damaging the recovery.
Here in Hastings, where we earn £35m a year from language students, we are at particular risk. The bizarre requirement to wait four weeks before recruiting non-EU skilled workers must be increasingly damaging, especially as there is no certainty that local workers, even if available, will be as competent.
How times have changed. In my youth, when Oswald Mosley demanded similar restrictions, the National Employed Workers Movement (the Jarrow hunger marchers) organised a demonstration demanding that asylum-seekers should be admitted. Whatever happened to unity among the "workers of the world"?
The excluded Iraqi artists are a testament to the moral disintegration of 21st-century Labour Britain.
Derek J Cole
St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex
You have properly carried coverage of Dame Nuala O'Loan's report into the UK Border Agency. However, there are three serious inaccuracies in your coverage.
First, you suggest the agency or ministers tried to deny these allegations when they first came to light. This is not true. I asked for details so I could investigate.
Second, you continue to refer to allegations numbering in the hundreds. Your reports have variously mentioned 200 or 300 allegations or complaints, and on 12 March you reported that asylum groups were able to hand over a dossier of 300 complaints. In fact, 48 allegations from 46 individuals were identified in that dossier. It is simply irresponsible to continue pretending that you or anyone else uncovered a cache of hundreds of disputed cases.
Third, you state that the report backs your claims that asylum seekers were abused by security guards. That is simply not supported by Dame Nuala's report. She found a complaints system that was not always capable of dealing adequately and fairly with complaints about the use of force, but recognised there have already been significant improvements. She categorically found that "there was no evidence of systemic abuse".
Chief Executive, UK Border Agency, Croydon, Surrey
How to tackle the budget deficit
There is a way to take out the levels of public spending needed to impact upon the deficit.
Much of the deficit is recurring public service costs, much of which are the costs of failure. These are the billions of pounds spent on drink and drug rehabilitation, educational under-achievement, lifetimes on benefits, the costs of policing, prisons, courts, teenage pregnancy, and above all the ongoing costs of poor parenting.
The deficit can be reduced by all parties coming to an agreement on how to address the failure in the first place. This would save billions upon billions of pounds, not just for one year as short-term frontline service cuts do, but for every subsequent year.
This can be achieved by intervening early in the life of babies, children and young people, so that instead of becoming a drain upon the taxpayer these children grow up to be productive, capable and well-rounded individuals. Early intervention spots problems before they happen, and with a small initial investment this virtuous circle can begin.
If all parties are willing to discuss this matter seriously then an agreed framework for future public spending could be put in place very swiftly. This would command widespread public support and begin the united approach which tackling the deficit and our social dysfunction deserves.
Graham Allen MP
(Lab, Nottingham North)
House of Commons
Those reckless young people
Young people are risk takers, whether taking drugs ("Drug ban chaos", 3 April), or embarking on "risky expeditions", Independent Life, 5 April), and there is a reason for this in brain development during adolescence – apart from just being plain bolshie.
Evidence using brain imaging shows that major reconstruction occurs between teens and early 20s (well described in the New Scientist, April 2009). Cerebral pruning removes unused neural connections made during the early growth spurt, and what is left is slowly stabilised.
One area is the prefrontal cortex, which is concerned with judgement, control of impulses and making decisions. During this reconstruction it is not surprising that this age group does not appreciate the long-term consequences of its actions.
What is needed is guidance and sympathy. Over-hasty banning of a drug will be counterproductive.
Dr Richard Paterson
Now that it has been reported that Joanna Lumley was allegedly warned that the Gurkha charity was charging veterans, (report, 5 April) can we expect her to apologise to Kevan Jones and to the Prime Minister?
Banks and charities
Martin Kyrle's letter (30 March) raises an issue which is of great importance to many charities. My experience of the banks' attitude to the deposit of charity moneys has been identical to his. Answers are needed to two questions: why do the banks discriminate against charities by declining to pay interest on deposits which would attract interest if made by individuals, and what efforts (if any) have been made by the Government and the Charity Commission to end this discrimination?
Battle for railways
I liked Michael Williams's elegiac article on the British love affair with the railway (3 April); it is a pity that he felt the need to bookend it with swipes at Bob Crow. Mr Crow and his members have legitimate concerns for the maintenance of a workable railway in this country, not just for their jobs. He often highlights the iniquitous way in which the whole enterprise is run for the benefit of franchisees and shareholders. The single biggest disincentive to railway use is price and price structure.
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Boris Johnson is to be congratulated in choosing the perfect sculpture to symbolise the state of our culture ("A monumental graceless tower", 6 April). On the point of collapse, chaotic, unfocused, devoid of meaning, this ode to bigness (Big Government, Big Business, Big Banks, Big Corporations, Big Society, Big Ideas) celebrates the triumph of size over quality. Tortuous and undecided, this unstable form reflects our agonised confusion over our most pressing problems: democracy, foreign wars, climate change. Brilliant too is the official choice of a name, ArcelorMittal Orbit – ugly, unpronounceable and impossible to remember.
Sorry, but Liz Hoggard (5 April) is wrong. The Doctor cannot regenerate as a woman. There are female Time Lords, but the male ones regenerate as males, and the females as female. We can be certain of that not only because of our previous encounters on Gallifrey with the Time Lords, but also from observing their society, where, if male Time Lords could regenerate into females there would have been more females on the High Council.
Needham Market, Suffolk
Migrants in Kos: Photos show real tragedy after British tourists complain of 'awkward' holidays
Fifa presidential election as it happened: Sepp Blatter declares 'I'm the president of everybody' after he is re-elected
Gay teenager's yearbook quote mocks the gender pay gap perfectly
Labour must distance itself from 'people who want something for nothing', says Andy Burnham
Cyclist, 32, dies after crash with Co-op lorry in London in sixth fatal accident this year
David Cameron holds face-to-face talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on EU reform
£16500 - £18500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: One of the leading Mercedes-Ben...
£27500 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is an exciting opportunity...
£19500 - £23500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Experienced B2B Telemarketer wa...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: This global company are looking for two Showro...