Public services that are for the people

Related Topics
CONSIDERABLE disquiet has been voiced of late about how the Civil Service is behaving much more like a private business. The movement towards quasi-independent 'Next Steps' agencies, the introduction of market testing, and the spread of local management autonomy have set alarm bells ringing.

The Labour MP John Garrett, writing in this newspaper, took the view that these analogues of commercial activity are putting at risk the entire ethos of the civil service. Dr Vernon Bogdanor, of Oxford University, argues that accountability is crucially lost when government services are privatised into agencies. He takes the view that when services step through the agency doorway, control by a parliament that can question ministers and call them to account disappears through the same portal. Both seem worried that the Civil Service is being politicised by this process. Loss of accountability, loss of control, loss of impartiality: these are serious charges to make. Are they justified?

It is one of the great fallacies of the public sector to suppose that public services can be controlled by people only through the political process. Although electors can, in theory, vote to influence the services for which their taxation pays, in practice their vote is often decided by more important national issues. This can leave services in a kind of limbo where the public has no effective control at all.

One of the discoveries of recent years is that control can be achieved by individual rather than collective action. The most effective control of all is to provide opportunities for people to make choices, choices that tell the producers of public services what their customers want to be delivered. When the choices themselves determine where public funds are to be allocated, the control is direct. Where choice cannot yet be introduced, the citizen will achieve some degree of control if the public sector producers are obliged to consult their customers about quality, and where there is some mechanism to secure redress when that quality is not attained.

The critics are right to point out that government is not a business. But it can learn a great deal from the way in which businesses treat their customers. For sound commercial reasons, most businesses take care to find out what their public wants. They try to attract customers by using efficient methods that give value for money, and they take particular care to handle them with sensitivity when things go wrong.

Government might have no commercial reasons for behaving like this, but it can choose to treat its citizens in a similar manner if it recognises it as a better may to behave. Part of the revolution in government has involved the introduction of techniques that incorporate the best practices of the private sector. The division into cost centres, the use of contractual relationships, the handing of managerial responsibility down the line and the introduction of performance-related pay, are as much a part of that revolution as are the requirements to consult customers, publish standards and offer redress.

One concern seems to be that these commercial practices might result in the loss of civil service jobs, even though most people would probably suppose that better services with fewer employees might be a good thing. Similarly, the thesis that accountability is lost when services are performed by civil service agencies is based on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The division that is thus created between the consumer and the contractor is not something narrowly commercial; it represents instead a practical approach, based on results, which sets out clearly what each side does and what their responsibilities are. This gives greater clarity and accountability on both sides.

There is also too much generalising about 'agencies'. We have nationalised industries, schools, NHS hospitals, local authorities and quangos in a vast brew of government, quasi-government and non-government organisations - they cannot all be lumped together for the purposes of accountability. 'Next Steps' agencies, as part of the Civil Service, are currently accountable to ministers. When services are provided by private sector organisations, they are provided under contract. Ministers retain accountability. The fact that a weapons system is provided by the private sector does not mean that ministers can escape accountability for it. All the responsibilities that the contractor takes on are defined in the contract.

The critics of the reforms seem to believe that better managed, high-quality public services cannot be achieved without doing violence to accountability, ethical standards, and even democracy itself. This is nonsense. Quality and accountability go hand in hand. Indeed the very exercise of consulting citizens and publishing standards reminds the providers of services that they have responsibility to their customers. Both Mr Garrett and Dr Bogdanor call for the constitutional status of civil servants to be clarified. They plead for the contractual relationship between ministers and civil servants to be spelt out. This might be sound practice, but it seems odd that they should plead for contractual relationships at the top, while arguing so emphatically against them elsewhere. Behind their calls seems to be a wish to reinvent collective decision-making. We are apparently to improve the quality of our public services by voting a lot more. I don't believe it.

I do believe that the important thing is whether public services are responsive to the producers or to the consumers. Services cannot be made to respond to the public by giving our citizens a democratic voice, and a distant and diffuse one at that, in their make-up. They can be made responsive only by giving the public choices, or by instituting mechanisms which build in publicly approved standards and redress when they are not attained.

Critics of the changes talk much about introducing the lowest level of government possible, by which they seem to mean local boards and committees. It never seems to dawn on them that the lowest level of government possible is that of the individual citizen. When they are empowered, as the revolution in government is empowering them, control is indeed at its lowest and most effective level.

The idea of the lowest level of government possible is one of the ideas the left has adopted from Reinventing Government by the American gurus Osborne and Gaebler. But government has been quietly reinventing itself for more than a decade. It has been remaking itself so that citizens will receive good value for the taxes they pay, and so that individual citizens can influence its output. This is real, and it works. It would be a poor exchange to trade it for the proliferation of elected boards and committees that are being offered in its place.

Dr Madsen Pirie is President of the Adam Smith Institute.

Hamish McRae is on holiday.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Recruitment Genius: Senior Solution Architect - Contract

£500 - £600 per day: Recruitment Genius: A Senior Solution Architect is requir...

360 Resourcing Solutions: Export Sales Coordinator

£18k - 20k per year: 360 Resourcing Solutions: ROLE: Export Sales Coordinato...

Recruitment Genius: B2B Telesales Executive - OTE £35,000+

£20000 - £35000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The largest developer of mobile...

SThree: Talent Acquisition Consultant

£22500 - £27000 per annum + OTE £45K: SThree: Since our inception in 1986, STh...

Day In a Page

Read Next
The old 1,000 Greek drachma notes and current 20 euros  

Greece debt crisis: History shows 'new drachma' is nothing to fear

Ben Chu
David Cameron leaves Number 10 to speak at Parliament  

Tunisia attack: To prevent more bloodshed we must accept that containment has not worked

Patrick Cockburn
How to stop an asteroid hitting Earth: Would people co-operate to face down a global peril?

How to stop an asteroid hitting Earth

Would people cooperate to face a global peril?
Just one day to find €1.6bn: Greece edges nearer euro exit

One day to find €1.6bn

Greece is edging inexorably towards an exit from the euro
New 'Iron Man' augmented reality technology could help surgeons and firefighters, say scientists

'Iron Man' augmented reality technology could become reality

Holographic projections would provide extra information on objects in a person's visual field in real time
Sugary drinks 'are killing 184,000 adults around the world every year'

Sugary drinks are killing 184,000 adults around the world every year

The drinks that should be eliminated from people's diets
Pride of Place: Historians map out untold LGBT histories of locations throughout UK

Historians map out untold LGBT histories

Public are being asked to help improve the map
Lionel, Patti, Burt and The Who rock Glasto

Lionel, Patti, Burt and The Who rock Glasto

This was the year of 24-carat Golden Oldies
Paris Fashion Week

Paris Fashion Week

Thom Browne's scarecrows offer a rare beacon in commercial offerings
A year of the caliphate:

Isis, a year of the caliphate

Who can defeat the so-called 'Islamic State' – and how?
Marks and Spencer: Can a new team of designers put the spark back into the high-street brand?

Marks and Spencer

Can a new team of designers put the spark back into the high-street brand?
'We haven't invaded France': Italy's Prime Minister 'reclaims' Europe's highest peak

'We haven't invaded France'

Italy's Prime Minister 'reclaims' Europe's highest peak
Isis in Kobani: Why we ignore the worst of the massacres

Why do we ignore the worst of the massacres?

The West’s determination not to offend its Sunni allies helps Isis and puts us all at risk, says Patrick Cockburn
7/7 bombings 10 years on: Four emergency workers who saved lives recall the shocking day that 52 people were killed

Remembering 7/7 ten years on

Four emergency workers recall their memories of that day – and reveal how it's affected them ever since
Humans: Are the scientists developing robots in danger of replicating the hit Channel 4 drama?

They’re here to help

We want robots to do our drudge work, and to look enough like us for comfort. But are the scientists developing artificial intelligence in danger of replicating the TV drama Humans?
Time to lay these myths about the Deep South to rest

Time to lay these myths about the Deep South to rest

'Heritage' is a loaded word in the Dixie, but the Charleston killings show how dangerous it is to cling to a deadly past, says Rupert Cornwell
What exactly does 'one' mean? Court of Appeal passes judgement on thorny mathematical issue

What exactly does 'one' mean?

Court of Appeal passes judgement on thorny mathematical issue