The not so discreet objects of desire

Share
Related Topics
Unlike Suzy Menkes I can't claim that I have had the honour of being banned from a Versace fashion show. All I can say is that I once had a ticket to one in Milan and couldn't be bothered. This was not because I didn't try, simply that I wasn't made of strong enough stuff to face the scrum of shrieking fashion editors who were shoving their way in. I merely observed grown women sobbing because their jobs depended on seeing this collection of sound-bite, rock 'n' roll, "do me" dresses. Now that the great man is dead these same fashion editors, whose expertise depends on knowing 24 words for taupe, are having to stretch their vocabularies to find words to describe murder and blood and rent-boys. Real life has momentarily interrupted their fantasy world in the form of real death.

Or am I being unfair? Hasn't fashion always dealt with "issues" other than whether white was the new black, whether bags were in or out, whether women over size 8 should be allowed out in public never mind the catwalk, whether junkies wearing mantillas held up by what look like human remains are really cutting edge, whether anything ever really matters if you have the perfect beige cashmere sweater? Fashion, after all, is a serious business and we should take it seriously. The fashion world has been devastated by Aids, they care enormously about the environment and breast cancer and racism and they have benefits and make clothes that encourage world peace.

OK, so it's easy enough to sneer at this trivial , insular and self-indulgent little planet. As Boris Johnson said of Versace's death, "Contemplating the headlines , many of us feel we are rubbing our noses up against the windowpane of a secret world that speaks a private language." What will they say when someone really great dies, he wailed. Of course the world of high fashion may appear like this, but is it any more insular and secret than the worlds of politics, of art, of film? Each of these worlds has its insiders, its stars, its cheerleaders and its dissidents. Each of these worlds has a language and a structure that the average punter does not fully understand. If anything fashion by its very nature is the most democratic of art forms. We all get dressed in the morning, we all make fashion decisions whether consciously or not. Even the person who says "I never think about what I look like" has already thought about it.

Yet our confusion about the relationship of fashion to the rest of the world has been highlighted by this shocking event. Versace has been painted a lone genius rather than head of a large creative team who actually produced his vision. For designers like Versace there is always life after death, because trade marks live forever. His Medusa buttons enable instant brand recognition, which is important for the kind of people who want to be branded in this way. Clothes were only part of his massive empire. As with Yves St Laurent and Calvin Klein, the name itself has become a commodity.

The outpouring of grief from the fashion cognoscenti has been somewhat over the top even for those whose profession is going over the top. Gianni "You are fashion" Versace may have been the ultimate fashion victim but he has not died for any particular cause.

The muddle over whether he was a misogynist or, as he claimed, able to give back "femininity" to women is further evidence of our schizophrenic attitude to fashion. There is no other popular art form that we would treat so simplistically. Nor would we place it in a vacuum devoid of historical and cultural context. So we have Versace who, with his tarty, showy frocks, emphasised sexual availability as a source of power for women, who helped them play once more; or we have Versace, the gay misogynist who squeezed women into tacky dresses inspired by the prostitutes he saw as a boy.

Yet if we look at the rise of Versace, we see a time in which Post-Aids "Look but don't touch" culture was on the rise, in which women were questioning power and what it meant to be a working woman, in which the nouveau riche wanted both to be classy and classless, expensively tasteless and in which the cult of celebrity recruited entire populations. While other designers, such as his rival Armani, and Donna Karan, were designing functional clothes that women could wear at work, day to evening wear, Versace made clothes that were definitely for going out in, for showing off in. This was power dressing for those whose power rested on pay and display and they appealed to everyone from East End girls to genuinely powerful women such as Madonna and Demi Moore.

Such decadence depended on a sense of artifice that is intrinsic to fashion, for if clothes are not about surface, identity and fantasy what are they about? Versace's frocks were for women who in John Berger's famous description "Watch themselves being looked at ... The surveyor of women in herself is male: the surveyed female. Thus she turns herself into an object ..." Versace merely gave women a guiding hand in what they were already skilled at. He was neither revolutionary nor reactionary, just an astute businessman who sold no more and no less than what has always been sold to women. There were very few Versace frocks that could be worn with underwear. It matters not whether Versace was gay or straight for despite the much- vaunted shock value of his boudoir imagination, he designed clothes that were essentially sexually conservative in that their very function was to turn women from subjects to objects. The twist was that women chose this for themselves.

Contrast this approach with a designer like Vivienne Westwood who, for all her battiness, talks of sexiness as being about what feels sexy to the woman herself. "At my age I'd rather have a bit of flab, I actually think that's more sexy. I like my own body." As Caroline Evans and Minna Thornton say in their book Women and Fashion, "The issue becomes one of the wearer's libido, rather than one of `being attractive'. Westwood fosters the idea of a self-defined feminine libido, however demented, which communicates itself idiosyncratically through dress ... The sexiness she expounds is autonomous: if the wearer thinks it is sexy, then it is". It is this autonomy, the opening up of sexuality that makes Westwood such an exciting designer, more transgressive than someone like Versace could ever be.

To complain then that fashion is somehow insignificant is to miss the point. It is precisely about making the insignificant signify something, about giving meaning to a cut, a button, a texture, a look. The fact that people spend vast amounts of money in order to demonstrate their individuality and all end up looking the same is the great paradox that drives it to continually restyle itself. Whatever its losses, the fashion world will continue churning out its clothes and we will continue to desire and dismiss them in the same breath. As Versace's death illustrates, even when the emperor is naked there are always those ready to rip the new clothes off his still warm corpse and say they are the greatest thing ever.

React Now

Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
iJobs Job Widget
iJobs General

Ashdown Group: Marketing Manager - London - up to £44,000

£38000 - £44000 per annum + bonus and benefits: Ashdown Group: Marketing Manag...

Ashdown Group: Graduate Application Support Analyst

£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...

Recruitment Genius: Quality Control Manager

£25000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This fast growing company is a ...

Recruitment Genius: Sales Consultants - Liverpool

£27300 - £36400 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Self-employed B2B Sales Consult...

Day In a Page

Read Next
 

Here’s why I’m so full of (coffee) beans

Jane Merrick
Syrian conflict is the world's first 'climate change war', say scientists, but it won't be the last one

Climate change key in Syrian conflict

And it will trigger more war in future
How I outwitted the Gestapo

How I outwitted the Gestapo

My life as a Jew in wartime Berlin
The nation's favourite animal revealed

The nation's favourite animal revealed

Women like cuddly creatures whilst men like creepy-crawlies
Is this the way to get young people to vote?

Getting young people to vote

From #VOTESELFISH to Bite the Ballot
Poldark star Heida Reed: 'I don't think a single bodice gets ripped'

Poldark star Heida Reed

'I don't think a single bodice gets ripped'
The difference between America and Israel? There isn’t one

The difference between America and Israel? There isn’t one

Netanyahu knows he can get away with anything in America, says Robert Fisk
Families clubbing together to build their own affordable accommodation

Do It Yourself approach to securing a new house

Community land trusts marking a new trend for taking the initiative away from developers
Head of WWF UK: We didn’t send Cameron to the Arctic to see green ideas freeze

David Nussbaum: We didn’t send Cameron to the Arctic to see green ideas freeze

The head of WWF UK remains sanguine despite the Government’s failure to live up to its pledges on the environment
Author Kazuo Ishiguro on being inspired by shoot-outs and samurai

Author Kazuo Ishiguro on being inspired by shoot-outs and samurai

Set in a mythologised 5th-century Britain, ‘The Buried Giant’ is a strange beast
With money, corruption and drugs, this monk fears Buddhism in Thailand is a ‘poisoned fruit’

Money, corruption and drugs

The monk who fears Buddhism in Thailand is a ‘poisoned fruit’
America's first slavery museum established at Django Unchained plantation - 150 years after slavery outlawed

150 years after it was outlawed...

... America's first slavery museum is established in Louisiana
Kelly Clarkson: How I snubbed Simon Cowell and become a Grammy-winning superstar

Kelly Clarkson: How I snubbed Simon Cowell and become a Grammy-winning superstar

The first 'American Idol' winner on how she manages to remain her own woman – Jane Austen fascination and all
Tony Oursler on exploring our uneasy relationship with technology with his new show

You won't believe your eyes

Tony Oursler's new show explores our uneasy relationship with technology. He's one of a growing number of artists with that preoccupation
Ian Herbert: Peter Moores must go. He should never have been brought back to fail again

Moores must go. He should never have been brought back to fail again

The England coach leaves players to find solutions - which makes you wonder where he adds value, says Ian Herbert
War with Isis: Fears that the looming battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

The battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

Aid agencies prepare for vast exodus following planned Iraqi offensive against the Isis-held city, reports Patrick Cockburn