Fifa drops Visit Saudi sponsorship of Women’s World Cup after backlash
The prize money for this summer’s Women’s World Cup has also been increased to $150m
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Discussions over a controversial commercial partnership between the Women’s World Cup and Saudi Arabia have been scrapped, Fifa president Gianni Infantino has said.
Infantino confirmed talks between Fifa and Visit Saudi were held over sponsoring this summer’s tournament in Australia and New Zealand but didn’t lead to a contract.
Initial reports that an agreement was in place between Fifa and Saudi Arabia were criticised by several leading players, while the tournament co-hosts said they would not be “comfortable” with the partnership due to human rights concerns.
Women’s rights are restricted in Saudi Arabia while same-sex relationships are illegal in the country, which led to stars such as Alex Morgan, Megan Rapinoe and Vivianne Miedema calling on Fifa to reject the deal five months before the tournament kicks off.
“There were discussions with Visit Saudi and in the end this discussion did not lead to a contract,” Infantino said at Fifa’s annual congress on Thursday. “So there was a storm in a teacup. There isn’t anything bad in making sponsorships from Saudi Arabia, from China, from the United States, from Brazil or from India.
“Fifa is a global organisation. I understand when it comes to Australia that Australia has trade with Saudi Arabia of around one and a half billion. This doesn’t seem to be an issue. There is a double standard there which I don’t understand.”
Football Australia chief executive James Johnson said: “We welcome clarification from Fifa regarding Visit Saudi. Equality, diversity and inclusion are really deep commitments for Football Australia and we’ll continue to work hard with Fifa to ensure the Women’s World Cup is shaped in this light and it is a historic event for our nation, showcasing the world’s greatest female players and advancing the game globally.”
In his closing remarks at the congress, Infantino also announced that the prize money for this summer’s Women’s World Cup will be $150m, 10 times what it was in 2015 and three times the amount of 2019.
The figure, however, is still considerably lower than the $440m total prize money awarded at the men’s World Cup in Qatar last year.
"For the first time ever, I (plan to) dedicate a specific portion of this payment, which mainly has to go to football development, but a specific portion of that should go of course to the players," Infantino said, in announcing Step Two of his three-step plan.
Step One, Infantino said, will be equal conditions and services for all men and women playing at a World Cup. Step Three, he said, would be the most complicated and would include a dedicated marketing strategy for the women’s game.
"Our mission will be able to have equality in payments for 2026 men’s and 2027 women’s World Cups."
Global soccer's players union FifPro applauded Thursday's announcement, saying it showed the intent of players and Fifa to work together.
"Through the voice and solidarity of players around the world over months and years of campaigning, significant progress has been made in the conditions, prize money, and prize money redistribution for the 2023 Fifa Women’s World Cup," it said in a statement.
Includes reporting from Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments