Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge excused from jury service because he was presiding over case

Judge Cutler's appeal for refusal was rejected

Ben Mitchell
Tuesday 16 April 2019 19:18 BST
Comments
Judge Cutler served as the coroner for the inquest of Mark Duggan who was shot by police in August 2011, sparking riots across London.
Judge Cutler served as the coroner for the inquest of Mark Duggan who was shot by police in August 2011, sparking riots across London. (Peter Macdiarmid/Getty)

A senior judge has revealed that he was called for jury service on his own case – and had to fight to be excused.

Judge Keith Cutler, the resident judge of Winchester and Salisbury since 2009, told a jury of his surprise when he was called upon to do his public duty as a juror.

Speaking at Salisbury Crown Court, the senior circuit judge said that even though he replied to the summons stating that he was the judge in the pending trial, his reason was rejected and he had to contact the Jury Central Summoning Bureau directly.

He said: “I was selected for jury service here at Salisbury Crown Court for a trial starting 23 April.

“I told the Jury Central Summoning Bureau that I thought I would be inappropriate seeing I happened to be the judge and knew all the papers.

“They wrote back to me, they picked up on the fact I was the judge but said, ‘Your appeal for refusal has been rejected but you could apply to the resident judge’ – but I told them ‘I am the resident judge’.

“I had to phone them up and they realised it was a mistake.”

The Hard Stop on cinema on July 15

Judge Cutler, who served as the coroner for the inquest of Mark Duggan who was shot by police in August 2011, sparking riots across London, and who has also served as president of the Council of Circuit Judges, said he would have been happy to have served as a juror if it had been appropriate.

He said: “I would have liked to have done the jury service to see what it was like and whether I would have liked the judge.”

A guide to jury summons issued by the Department of Justice states: “The normal expectation is that everyone summoned for jury service will serve at the time for which they are summoned.

“However, it is recognised that there will be occasions when it is not reasonable for a person to serve at the time for which they are summoned.”

Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in