The Internet of Things started in the mid-1990s, when a quirky young brand manager in the UK puzzled over why a shade of brown lipstick kept disappearing from shop shelves.
The story matters because the Internet of Things, or IoT, has become prodigious yet ephemeral, as difficult to grasp and explain as the Holy Spirit. Cisco's chief executive John Chambers declared that IoT will generate $19trn in profits, which doesn't help because, frankly, when you cite such an unfathomable number it's hard not to sound like you're pulling it out of thin air. Cisco, General Electric and swarms of start-ups have hitched their futures to IoT.
Like a lot of innovations, IoT grew out of a new solution to an old problem. Now it's opening up new solutions to a whole host of problems. And like a lot of innovations, IoT happened less by magic and genius than by a lot of small steps and bits of luck.
Kevin Ashton was born in 1968 in Birmingham, to a single mother who moved to London and bought her son an Apple II. He liked to mess with programming, but it wasn't really his calling. Mostly, he liked to write. As a teenager, Ashton DJ-ed around Europe, wound up in Norway, learned to speak Norwegian and read a lot of Henrik Ibsen. At 21, he decided it was time to go to university, so began a Scandinavian literature course at the University of London. While there, he joined the student newspaper, became its editor – and became friendly with representatives of one of the paper's biggest advertisers, Procter & Gamble.
By graduation, he was disillusioned with journalism – "Not quite the truth-seeking missile I'd hoped," he says now – and instead got involved in a hip noodle-bar start-up called Wagamama. This being 1995, he was going to help Wagamama establish an internet brand, because the internet was the most exciting thing ever. But founder Alan Yau couldn't afford it, so Ashton split. (Wagamama now operates more than 140 restaurants all over the world.)
Ashton's old friends from P&G offered him a job. They worked in cool offices in London, which is why he said yes. He was assigned to help launch a line of cosmetics for Oil of Olay. Since Ashton was young and curious and didn't know what he shouldn't worry about, it bothered him that he'd go into his local Boots and find that one shade of lipstick in his make-up line always seemed to be sold out. He checked with P&G's supply chain people, who told him plenty of that colour were in the warehouse. They suggested it was a coincidence – that he happened to go into the one branch that couldn't keep that colour in stock. But Ashton didn't buy it: he wanted to know where his lipstick was, and what was happening to it. No one could tell him.
In the 1980s and 1990s, retailers invested in bar code scanning systems and thought that the systems gave them a grip on inventory. But bar codes couldn't relay much about a product's location. "This illusion of perfect information created by the bar code was just way off," Ashton says. His notion that there had to be a more thorough way to track products intrigued P&G's leaders in Cincinnati, and they asked him to explore the idea.
About the same time, British retailers began experimenting with loyalty cards embedded with a brand-new technology involving a tiny "radio-enabled" chip, later called RFID. One card manufacturer showed Ashton how the chips worked, noting that the small bits of data on the chips could be transferred wirelessly, without a reader. Driving in traffic, a thought occurred to him: "What if I took the radio microchip out of the credit card and stuck it on my lipstick?" If a wireless network could pick up data on a card, it could snatch data off a chip on a lipstick package and tell the store what was on the shelves.
P&G was a sponsor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab (along with half of corporate America). This led to meetings between P&G, Ashton and MIT, which in turn led to P&G loaning Ashton to MIT to set up the Auto-ID Center to study RFID and the potential for "smart packaging". New ideas never happen in a vacuum. In 2000, MIT physicist Neil Gershenfeld published a book, When Things Start to Think, about adding data to everyday items. Gershenfeld's work influenced Ashton. P&G's executives listened to Don Tapscott, a Canadian author who talked about how ubiquitous networks and data would transform corporations. Ashton gave hundreds of presentations to corporate leaders about the potential of RFID and how each chip was able to talk to a wireless network. By 2003, the Auto-ID center had 103 sponsors, branches around the world and commitments to standards so any smart package could talk to networks at suppliers and retailers.
Standards helped the market develop, and money poured into making the chips better and cheaper. The media started picking up on stories about, for instance, supermarkets where you could fill your trolley with stuff and check out in a second by wheeling past a wireless reader. Start-ups sprouted, including ThingMagic in 2002, which Ashton joined on leaving the Auto-ID Center.
By the 2010s, corporations began to see that The Next Big Thing would be networking the physical world and gathering data from everything. Consultants like McKinsey wrote reports. IBM drew up its Smarter Planet campaign. Cisco, GE and others leapt in. IoT technology can help cities manage congestion, help sport track balls and players to better understand how they play, and let medical devices call for help when readings look bad. IoT devices are finding their way into Barbie dolls and making governments worry that all these networked things will spy on people. And it all flows from Ashton's question about brown lipstick.
Ashton isn't well known. Tim Berners-Lee gets credit for engendering the Web. Douglas Engelbart is lauded for designing the first modern PC. Rarely in a conversation about IoT does anyone point to Ashton as the father of it all.
Ashton seems to be OK with that. He's worked at a few IoT start-ups, including one he founded. He's now living in Austin, Texas, and writing. He's just published a book, How to Fly a Horse: The Secret History of Creation, Invention and Discovery. It's about the way innovation really happens, which is less by magic and genius than by a lot of small steps and bits of luck. In other words, what he learned while setting in motion the Internet of Things.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies