Kylie and Kendall Jenner deny claims clothing company failed to pay factory workers (Getty)
Kylie and Kendall Jenner deny claims clothing company failed to pay factory workers (Getty)

Kylie and Kendall Jenner deny claims their clothing company failed to pay Bangladesh factory workers: 'This is untrue'

'We manufacture in countries all over the world and have not received any concerns from the factories who produce our goods'

Chelsea Ritschel
New York
Friday 03 July 2020 19:16
Comments

Kendall and Kylie Jenner have denied claims that their clothing line failed to pay factory workers in Bangladesh amid the coronavirus pandemic.

In June, Remake, a non-profit organisation dedicated to ethical fashion, claimed that the reality stars’ clothing company Kendall + Kylie was owned by Global Brands Group (GBG), a company it said failed to pay garment workers in Bangladesh for cancelled orders in February and March.

In a letter from Rick Darling, CEO of GBG dated 21 March 2020 and obtained by Remake, he said: “Given the unpredictability of the situation, our retail partners have cancelled orders, and existing inventory and product in production may have no sell-through. Consequently, we have no choice but to make the difficult decision to cancel all S/S 2020 orders from all suppliers (without liability)."

In Remake's article, it referenced GBG’s website, which previously listed Kendall and Kylie's company as part of its portfolios of brands it had worked with, as the link between the two companies.

The accusations were also reposted on the Diet Prada Instagram account, prompting backlash against the sisters’ company.

On Thursday, the reality stars shared a statement on the Kendall + Kylie Instagram account, where they said the claims are “untrue” and that their company is not owned by GBG.

“We would like to address the unfortunate and incorrect rumour that Global Brands Group owns the Kendall + Kylie brand and that we have neglected to pay factory workers in Bangladesh as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic,” the statement reads. “This is untrue.

“The Kendall + Kylie brand is owned by 3072541 Canada Inc, not GBG.”

In the statement, the company explained it had worked with CAA-GBG in the past in a “sales and business development capacity only,” but that the clothing company does “not currently have any relationship at all with GBG.”

Continuing, the Kendall + Kylie team said: “We know that these are trying times for the fashion industry and garment workers as a whole, and we continue to support all of our partners working in the factories who produce our products.”

“We manufacture in countries all over the world and have not received any concerns from the factories who produce our goods,” the company concluded.

GBG, which removed Kylie and Kendall's company’s logo from its site on 24 June, said in a statement to the DailyMail at the time: “CAA-GBG is the Brand Management Division of Global Brands Group (GBG) and does not design or manufacture any product for Kendall + Kylie.”

The Independent has contacted Global Brands Group for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in