Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Are the Scots really sucking up a massive subsidy?

It’s worth re-stating the facts

Ben Chu
Wednesday 10 September 2014 13:10 BST
Comments
(Getty Images)

The Scottish referendum campaign is turning desperate. And also nasty.

Accusations about public service spending in Scotland are flying around, with familiar claims of a massive “subsidy” being aired (see here).

It’s worth re-stating the facts.

These figures are all taken from the Treasury’s latest Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses tables and HMRC’s most recent income and tax tables.

Public service spending per head in Scotland is higher than in England and Wales.

But it’s lower than Northern Ireland:

It’s also worth noting that Scotland gets less health spending per head than some English regions:

And less education spending per head than London:

And if we’re talking about subsidy we should also think about income tax as well.

Here’s the picture by UK regional breakdown:

This shows that average Scottish taxpayers pay less than English ones, but more than Northern Irish and Welsh ones.

It’s also worth putting English regions into the tax picture too.

Here’s the mean average tax breakdown:

Scots contribute more than any English region outside the South East and East, reflecting the fact that their average incomes are high relative to the rest of the UK.

The mean average is skewed by a small number of high earners. But the picture from the median average breakdown, which shows taxpayers in the middle of the distribution, is similar:

There are, of course, many other considerations – such as spending on public infrastructure and how to account for the revenues from North Sea oil pumped off Scotland’s coast. Indirect consumption taxes and business levies are not part of this picture. There is also the question of whether to adjust for regional demographic and health variation (which affect patterns of demand for health and education spending). The Institute for Fiscal Studies has a comprehensive treatment here. But for the sake of simplicity I’m focusing on these headline numbers.

Fairness is often in the eye of the beholder, but the above doesn’t look to me like a picture of Scots sucking up an outrageous public spending subsidy from the rest of the United Kingdom.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in