Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: UK financial watchdog warns bank moves to EU cities likely to be 'irreversible'

FCA chief executive Andrew Bailey warns firms are unlikely to back pedal once staff moves commence

Kalyeena Makortoff
Tuesday 31 October 2017 16:49 GMT
Comments
Andrew Bailey said most banks were preparing for Brexit on the likelihood that no deal will be reached with the EU
Andrew Bailey said most banks were preparing for Brexit on the likelihood that no deal will be reached with the EU

The head of Britain's financial watchdog has warned that the value of a Brexit transition period will start "eroding" by the start of 2018 as banks introduce "irreversible" contingency plans by the start of the new year.

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) chief executive Andrew Bailey told MPs on Tuesday that firms are unlikely to back-pedal once they start relocating staff to the EU, or hiring new employees on the continent.

"They are already taking positions ... for instance, they're renting buildings in places at the moment. I think they would regard those sorts of decisions as essentially fairly reversible," Mr Bailey told the Treasury Select Committee.

"I think where it really starts to get more irreversible or at least harder - and this is what they all tell me - is in terms of staff, and that is two parts: one is either relocating staff or hiring staff."

He said firms were very conscious of the Brexit deadline at the end of March 2019 and would have to take action "in advance", either by persuading staff to move abroad, or by recruiting in labour markets that are "often much tighter for skills they want" than what they currently encounter in the UK.

"So that is why they - and we - tend to take the view that the end of this year, beginning of next year, is the point at which these things start happening.

"Each firm will no doubt give you a slightly different date if you push for precision, but I think that's the sort of date to have in mind when things start to happen that have much bigger consequences," Mr Bailey said.

It echoes comments by the head of Germany's financial regulator Felix Hufeld, who warned last week that City firms were nearing the "point of no return", which he said will be "somewhere around early next year".

Mr Bailey noted that most banks were preparing for Brexit on the likelihood that no deal will be reached with the EU.

"You can call it hard Brexit, you can call it no deal, but there is no inbuilt assumption that something good happens in this negotiation that in a sense, that, you know, saves the day."

It comes amid reports that the Bank of England is currently operating under the assumption that up to 75,000 jobs could move from the UK as a result of Brexit.

The BBC, which first reported the figure, said that the number was subject to the outcome of Brexit negotiations.

In a wide-ranging committee hearing, Mr Bailey spoke at length about the financial watchdog's investigation into Royal Bank of Scotland's treatment of small businesses which were shifted into its controversial Global Restructuring Group (GRG).

RBS chief executive Ross McEwan has written to MPs outlining a number of "concerns" over the methodology and approach of the FCA's interim report, which identified a number of failings at the bank.

The state-backed lender has been dogged by allegations that it intentionally pushed businesses towards failure in the hopes of picking up their assets on the cheap.

"The bank does not agree that the evidence relied upon by the Skilled Person substantiates the key finding that the bank is guilty of 'widespread inappropriate treatment of customers'," Mr McEwan said in his letter, adding that there was no distinction drawn between process failings and conduct failings.

Mr Bailey told MPs that the bank should have accepted its findings, and blamed those disputes for delaying the release date of the interim report.

"I think the report is strongly critical of RBS and I think it is, frankly, unfortunate that RBS have not in a sense accepted that, I think, more readily," Mr Bailey said.

"I think they should do, because a lot of ... time and a lot of effort and a lot of work has been done on this."

The FCA said it is still investigating RBS.

Mr Bailey also answered questions regarding controversial proposals that would allow state-owned Saudi Aramco - which is preparing to list only around 5 per cent of its shares - to sidestep rules that companies must sell at least 25 per cent of their shares to gain a "premium" status.

The FCA chief defended the move, which he said was "not a hard and fast rule".

"Twenty-five per cent of one company is vastly different from 25 per cent of another company in terms of liquidity and scale," he said.

Mr Bailey also confirmed the date of a previously reported meeting with the oil giant, saying it met with the finance chief on January 27 - which was just weeks before it launched consultations over "enhancements" to the market listing regime.

The FCA head said there was nothing out of the ordinary about the fact that the meeting took place.

"We meet people, that's what we do."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in