Court wants E-Clear evidence by Friday
E-Clear, the payments processing company embroiled in a £35m row with the administrators of collapsed Scottish airline Globespan, has until Friday to provide the High Court with proof it has the funds and a breakdown of why it needs to retain them.
At a hearing in London yesterday, Mr Justice Floyd adjourned the case against E-Clear until next Tuesday, but set a Friday deadline for the company to lay its evidence before the court.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), the administrators appointed when Globespan went bust in December, is filing for E-Clear itself to be put into administration because of a dispute over £35m-worth of Globespan's money being held by the processing group.
Although it is common for companies handling credit card payments to retain a portion of the funds as security, PwC maintains that E-Clear is only exposed to around £15m of potential claims and that the remaining £20m relates to flights that have already taken place.
E-Clear's counsel told the hearing yesterday that the company has not had sufficient time to put its evidence together. The company has repeatedly confirmed it has the £35m, but says it must hold on to the cash for six months to ensure any refund claims can be met. The group's counsel told the court yesterday that E-Clear now expects charge-backs from Globespan's credit card customers to be more than £35m.
Elias Elia, the chief executive of E-Clear, was not at the hearing yesterday. Mr Elia's Halcyon Investments was part of a proposed £9m rescue package put together to save Globespan in November, but the deal did not go ahead. Because E-Clear specialises in providing clearing to distressed companies, he has also been exposed to a string of other bankruptcies including the collapses of XL, Zoom, SkyEurope and Go Travel Direct.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies