Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gambling minister in teddy bear ambush

Rachel Stevenson
Friday 26 November 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

The Government minister responsible for the Gambling Bill, Lord McIntosh, found himself on a podium with two teddy bears yesterday. The larger one, an £8 prize in a "grab-a-teddy" arcade machine, will be banned under the Government's new gambling regime, considered too dangerous a temptation for children. The smaller one, worth £5 and won from a 10p bet, will be allowed as a prize, provoking fury from the amusement arcade industry.

The Government minister responsible for the Gambling Bill, Lord McIntosh, found himself on a podium with two teddy bears yesterday. The larger one, an £8 prize in a "grab-a-teddy" arcade machine, will be banned under the Government's new gambling regime, considered too dangerous a temptation for children. The smaller one, worth £5 and won from a 10p bet, will be allowed as a prize, provoking fury from the amusement arcade industry.

The British Amusement and Catering Trade Association (Bacta), which fears its revenues are threatened by the move, told Lord McIntosh the policy did not fit with the other measures in the Government's Gambling Bill. The planned Bill allows for the introduction of unlimited-prize slot machines in new "supercasinos".

Tim Batstone, the president of Bacta, presented Lord McIntosh with the teddy bears, as Bacta members asked why an £8 bear was considered "more addictive" than a £5 one. Lord McIntosh said: "If [the prize] is important to you [the industry], then it is important to children."

Malcolm Moss, the Conservative spokesman for culture, warned the Bill was in danger of failing. "There may not be enough time before the next election because the Government has messed things up," he said.

The committee of MPs debating the Bill hasreached only clause 33 because of the climbdown by the Government on its casino strategy. It was scheduled to have been debating clause 132 of the Bill by now.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in