Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

German jobs guaranteed in BAE/EADS merger

Tom Bawden
Tuesday 18 September 2012 20:52 BST
Comments

The political manoeuvring around BAE Systems' proposed £30bn merger with Eads continued yesterday as the European aerospace giant assured the German government that it would guarantee for two years about 20,000 jobs at its military industrial unit in the country.

The guarantee, made by Eads's chief executive, Tom Enders, is thought to cover most, if not all, of its Cassidian defence and security unit, which employs 12,000 of the group's 49,000 staff in the country.

It comes a year after Eads guaranteed until 2020 the jobs of the 20,000 staff it employs in Germany to make its Airbus aircraft, helping to settle a dispute with staff. Eads is not able to offer such a long guarantee to its defence workers because the contracts they fulfil tend to be shorter-term. A spokesman for Eads declined to comment on any talks with the German government.

The political wrangling over the merger continued elsewhere, as the US Defence Department said it needed more information about the deal before it could assess its security implications and give it the green light.

BAE has a strong presence in the US, where it is a key supplier to the giant F-35 stealth fighter jet programme. However, while the US maintains a strong military relationship with the UK, analysts point out that it is less close to France, Germany and Spain, which own stakes in Eads.

"I don't think we know the BAE-Eads final configuration," the US Air Force Secretary, Michael Donley, said. "We just have to wait until they're done, until the Department of Defence can assess what the conditions [or] the governance for such a merger would be."

Although the US government had agreed special security arrangements with foreign-owned companies in the past allowing them to work on sensitive military and intelligence contracts, he said each of those deals was "very individual and very specific".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in