OFT delivers setback to auditors over liability cap
The Office of Fair Trading concluded yesterday that introducing a cap on auditors' liability would not increase competition in the audit market, decreasing the possibility that the Government will introduce such a measure.
The audit profession, dominated by the big four accountants, Ernst & Young, KPMG, Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers, argues a limit on liabilities would reduce barriers to entry for smaller firms and also cut the risk of collapses.
However, the watchdog dismissed these claims, saying a cap would likely "be competitively neutral overall". The OFT described the unlimited liability for negligence or incompetence as a "discipline on audit quality", noting that although third parties rely on audits, companies pay for them. The OFT also noted the collapse of Andersen was due to reputational, rather than financial damage from the Enron scandal.
The Government, which asked the OFT to investigate the impact of cap on liability in June, is unlikely to support a cap unless it could be shown to benefit the audit market.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies