Small man syndrome explained? Men who feel insecure about their masculinity 'may be more likely to resort to violence'

Study indicates insecurity could be a factor underlying aggressive acts

Study could go some way to explain 'small man syndrome' - AKA the 'Napoleon complex'
Study could go some way to explain 'small man syndrome' - AKA the 'Napoleon complex'

Men who feel insecure about their masculinity may be more likely to resort to violence, research in the USA has shown.

In a survey of 600 men, those who perceived themselves as less masculine and worried what other people thought of them were as likely to say they had committed a violent act as those men who identified themselves as particularly masculine.

By contrast, those men who considered themselves less masculine than average, but didn’t worry about it, were the least likely to act violently, or to engage in other dangerous behaviour, such as drink driving.

The researchers behind the study, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of Violence Prevention, said that violence control efforts should focus on how “gender norms may induce distress in boys and men” that could lead them to “act out” with risk-taking or violence.

Men are already known to be at greater risk of injury and poor health, and are more likely to take risks like drug-taking, driving under the influence and carrying a weapon, the study said. Those who identify as highly masculine are generally more likely to take part in these behaviours.

However, the findings indicate that insecurity could also be a factor underlying aggressive or dangerous acts. In the survey men were asked how strongly they agreed with statements that tested their own attitudes to their masculinity, such as “I am less masculine than the average guy”.

They were also asked to respond to statements that indicated how worried they were about this – such as “I wish I was more manly” and “I worry that women find me less attractive because I’m not as macho as other guys”.

Finally they were asked to give information on whether they had ever been in a fight, assaulted someone, used a weapon or intentionally caused serious injury.

Those who both considered themselves less masculine, and worried about others perceptions of them because of this – known as masculine discrepancy stress – were more than three times more likely to have committed an assault that caused injury, than those who had low levels of this kind of stress, the study, published in the journal Injury Prevention, found.

They were also more likely to have committed assault with a weapon.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in