Priti Patel outlines new agreement to curb English Channel migration

Channel crossings: Britain and France reach agreement to prevent migrants making journey

Number of crossings this year exceeded 8,000, compared to 1,835 last year

Sam Hancock@samhancock95
Sunday 29 November 2020 08:28
0 comments
Leer en Español

The UK and France have signed a €31.4m (£28.2m) agreement aimed at reducing the number of migrants illegally crossing the English Channel.

Priti Patel, the home secretary, and her French counterpart Gerald Darmanin said they planned to increase police presence and use drones to make the route - used by more than 8,000 people this year - more difficult to cross. 

As part of the package, double the number of French police who patrol a 150 km (93 miles) stretch of coastline will be deployed, and there will be an increase in surveillance technology used - including drones, radar equipment, cameras and hi-tech binoculars. 

Speaking inside the Foreign Office on Saturday, Ms Patel praised the “joint intelligence” between the two nations, citing it as the reason “the French authorities have stopped over 5,000 migrants from crossing into the United Kingdom”. 

She said: “This new package today that I have just signed with my French counterpart, the French interior minister, effectively doubles the number of police on the French beaches, it invests in more technologies and surveillance - more radar technology that support the law enforcement effort - and on top of that we are now sharing in terms of toughening up our border security.”

The increase in technological equipment is an attempt to help the French deploy officers to the right places to detect migrants and stop them before they start their journey, the Home Office said.

Ms Patel did not, however, disclose how many more officers would be deployed - only that the new agreement would “make a difference” to the number of migrants crossing the Channel.

She said the number of people making the crossing had grown exponentially, blaming this year’s largely good weather in the UK and the fact that trafficking gangs had reduced the cost of channel-crossing journeys - meaning more people are “risking their lives”. 

“We should not lose sight of the fact that illegal migration exists for one fundamental reason: that is because there are criminal gangs - people traffickers - facilitating this trade,” Ms Patel said.

The number of people crossing the channel in small boats has increased dramatically this year, with more than 8,000 reaching the UK - compared with 1,835 in 2019, according to the PA news agency.

And despite gradually worsening conditions as Britain enters its winter months, the UK’s Border Force has continued to deal with migrants making the dangerous trip from northern France.

Home secretary Priti Patel is known for her zero-tolerance attitude towards migrants illegally entering the UK

The announcement was criticised by one charity official as an “extraordinary mark of failure”. Bella Sankey, director of humanitarian charity Detention Action, said: “No amount of massaging the numbers masks her refusal to take the sensible step of creating a safe and legal route to the UK from northern France, thereby preventing crossings and child deaths.”

A recent report exposed nearly 300 border-related deaths in and around the English Channel since 1999. Written by Mael Galisson, from Gisti, a legal service for asylum seekers in France, it described the evolution of border security in and around the Dover Strait as a “history of death”.

The agreement includes steps to support migrants into accommodation in France, as well as measures to increase border security at ports in the north and west of the country. It builds on measures previously agreed which the Home Office said had seen the proportion of crossings intercepted rise from 41 per cent in 2019 to 60 per cent in recent weeks.

Ms Sankey, of Detention Action, said the “dangerous” agreement would never have a “significant impact”.

Speaking to reporters today, she said it was an example of Ms Patel “throwing taxpayers’ money away on more of the same measures that stand no chance of having a significant impact on this dangerous state of affairs”.

Comments

Share your thoughts and debate the big issues

Learn more

Delete Comment

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Report Comment

Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts

Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.

  • You may not agree with our views, or other users’, but please respond to them respectfully
  • Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable
  • Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties
  • We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification

You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.

Create a commenting name to join the debate

Create a commenting name to join the debate

  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • Most liked

There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts