General Election 2015: Lords and Commons decamp to reviled QEII conference centre while Parliament is renovated

Exclusive: Controversial 1980s building is set to be democracy's new home once multibillion restoration of the Palace of Westminster begins

Mark Leftly
Sunday 12 April 2015 17:24
Comments
The Queen Elizabeth II centre has been touted as a “no-brainer” for it to become Parliament’s temporary home when the palace is refurbished
The Queen Elizabeth II centre has been touted as a “no-brainer” for it to become Parliament’s temporary home when the palace is refurbished

MPs and peers are set to move from the Gothic majesty of the Palace of Westminster to a conference centre that is derided as one of London’s ugliest buildings, when the Houses of Parliament undergo essential renovation.

The Independent on Sunday has learnt that the coalition quietly shelved the idea of including the Queen Elizabeth II centre in a “for sale” list after ministers were told it was a “no-brainer” for it to become Parliament’s temporary home when the palace is refurbished. The Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, recently warned that the palace, which is slowly sinking into the river Thames, will have to be permanently vacated within 20 years unless extensive work starts soon.

An investigation has revealed:

* a post-election report will confirm that MPs and peers must move out while renovation work takes place;

* the cost has probably been underestimated by around £1bn;

* Parliament could have to close for longer than the five years mooted;

* cleaning up the courtyards alone will cost “tens of millions” of pounds and take six years.

Accountants Deloitte, architects HOK and engineers Aecom will soon publish a Parliament-commissioned report on the best option for organising the repair works when they start in around 2020.

The cost of restoring the Palace of Westminster has been estimated at more than £3bn

A source close to the team said that the renovation would be “pretty comprehensive” so that either all of Parliament would have to be relocated, or the move could be divided so that MPs or peers decamp in turns. It is possible that one-term MPs might never get to speak from the Commons’ green benches.

One option was to undertake repairs around politicians as they worked, but it is understood that this will be ruled out, given the delicate nature of restoring the World Heritage Site. Among the challenges is a tunnel running underneath Parliament that has become hard to access because of technology installed over the years, from telegraph equipment to broadband wiring.

There had been speculation that Parliament could move temporarily to the North. However, it is understood that parliamentary commissioners, who include Mr Bercow, believe that the QEII centre is the most sensible option as, at 200m from the palace, it would cause the least disruption.

While the refurbishment is taking place, MPs would not have to leave their offices in Portcullis House, or the Norman Shaw buildings next to Parliament. Those involved in the decision also point out that MPs need to be close to central departmental offices, such as those in Whitehall, and Downing Street.

The QEII is owned by the Communities department. It could be configured to ape the confrontational arrangement of government and opposition benches, and has enough space to accommodate the most crowded of Parliamentary debates. A source said Communities ministers were told about three years ago that the QEII – which made a list of Daily Telegraph readers’ most hated London buildings – was the overwhelming favourite place for the relocation.

A former minister said: “A request was made for the QEII Centre to not be put on the sale list until a decision is made on decamping Parliament during the rebuild.”

Labour might try to sell the QEII Centre for around £25m if it wins the election, but a senior party source insisted that this would not stand in the way of renting the venue during the refurbishment period.

Firms which have considered bidding for the renovation work say suggestions it would cost about £3bn may be an underestimate. A construction industry source said: “They don’t know what’s around or underneath Parliament, they don’t know what they’re going to find. We reckon it could cost 25 to 50 per cent more than the £3bn mentioned.”

Also, it appears likely that the restoration will take longer than the five years mooted. Cleaning up the seven courtyards alone could take six years, and cost tens of millions of pounds. This could be undertaken as a separate contract, but a source said it would make sense for it to be part of the broader reconstruction work.


The Independent has got together with May2015.com to produce a poll of polls that produces the most up-to-date data in as close to real time as is possible.

Click the buttons below to explore how the main parties' fortunes have changed:

All data, polls and graphics are courtesy of May2015.com. Click through for daily analysis, in-depth features and all the data you need. (All historical data used is provided by UK Polling Report)

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in