Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

George Osborne won't get away with shuffling money around again, warns IFS

The Chancellor was forced to announced £50 billion of extra borrowing

Jon Stone
Thursday 17 March 2016 11:02 GMT
Comments
George Osborne announced
George Osborne announced (Reuters)

George Osborne will likely have to find huge spending cuts or tax rises in his next budget, the director of the respected authority of budget matters has said.

Paul Johnson, who heads the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), warned that Wednesday’s Budget was probably the last time Mr Osborne could claim to be on course to hit his own targets by “shuffling money around”.

The Chancellor says he wants to deliver a budget surplus by the 2020 general election – but he was forced to announce £50 billion of extra borrowing yesterday after the Office for Budget Responsibility downgraded growth forecasts.

“Within his very tight rule he will probably get away with this this time round. But there's only about a 50-50 shot that he's going to get there,” Mr Johnson told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

“If things change again, if the OBR downgrades its forecasts again, I don't think he will be able to get away with anything like this. I think he will be forced to put some proper tax increases in or possibly find some yet further proper spending cuts.

“I think this is going to be the last chance he gets to move things around like this without doing anything genuinely big to the public finances.”

The Chancellor has repeatedly moved back his targets to reduce the deficit since he came to power in 2010 – despite announcing new ones.

A headline-grabbing tax on sugar was announced (PA)

Though unacknowledged by Mr Osborne, borrowing figures suggest he eased off deficit reduction mid-way through the previous parliament after the economy threatened to tip back into the recession.

Crucially, the Office for Budget Responsibility said yesterday that economic productivity was not growing as quickly has had been expected.

Because productivity growth underpins all other parts of the economy, economic performance suffered in all areas – and may do in the future if no rebound comes.

The IFS’s analysis adds to the possibility that the Chancellor may be unintentionally storing up economic bad news until just before the 2020 general election.

Mr Osborne has already postponed sharp cuts to tax credits until the roll-out of Universal Credit – which is now expected for 2020, when the next election is scheduled.

Disabled people were the main losers from the Budget (Getty Images)

Now the IFS believes further cuts or tax rises may be on the cards – just as the world economic outlook slows and productivity fails to take off.

The Chancellor rejected the IFS’s analysis. He told the BBC’s Breakfast programme he was on course to deliver his plans.

“I have set out the plans in the Budget and then a completely independent body which everybody respects - the Office for Budget Responsibility - has looked at those plans and it says, 'If you hold to the course, you deliver those plans’,” he said.

“If the economy grows as expected, then we will have a surplus towards the end of the parliament'. We wouldn't need anything extra like more spending cuts or more tax increases.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s response to the Budget highlighted Mr Osborne’s missed targets.

“Over the past six years the Chancellor’s set targets on deficit, on debt, on productivity, on manufacturing and construction, on exports,” he said. “He’s failed in all of them and he’s failing this country.”

Mr Osborne’s budget included a tax on sugary drinks, tax cuts to capital gains, corporation tax, and the higher rate of tax for roughly the top 15 per cent of earners.

New measures were also announced to help people under 40 save for retirement, strip disabled people of support, and devolve power to city and combined county authority regions.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in