Government at risk of breaking its own welfare spending cap

 

The Government is “vulnerable to a breach” of the cap on welfare spending in 2015-16
The Government is “vulnerable to a breach” of the cap on welfare spending in 2015-16

The Government has been warned that it may breach its self-imposed cap on welfare spending because it is failing in its drive to reduce the cost of the main benefit for the sick and disabled.

Leaked documents say that the cost of Employment Support Allowance (ESA) is projected to rise to £13.3bn by the 2018-19 financial year and is "one of the largest fiscal risks currently facing the government".

Reports passed to the BBC suggest the Government is “vulnerable to a breach” of the £119.5bn cap on welfare spending in 2015-16 previously trumpeted by George Osborne. Ministers would either have to cut spending or make a statement to Parliament explaining their failure. The documents warn that further cuts would be controversial, saying that the “low-hanging fruit” has already been picked.

Ministers had hoped that more regular “fitness for work” tests would reduce the bill. But reports say that people are remaining on ESA for longer than expected because their illness and disability has been underestimated. Claimants are moving off Jobseeker's Allowance and on to ESA, which has fewer sanctions. There have also been problems with the private firm Atos, which is withdrawing from its contract to carry out health assessments.

Public spending watchdogs have attacked the launch of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for the disabled as a “fiasco”.

Rachel Reeves, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said the work capability assessment was "in meltdown” and urged David Cameron to “get a grip” of the “chaotic” Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). "It is a catalogue of total failure and threatens huge costs to the taxpayer," she said.

The Treasury insisted that delivery of ESA was "back on track" and said it was "confident" of remaining within the cap, which excludes the state pension and some jobless benefits. A DWP spokesman said the spending projections were "spurious scenarios" based on no action being taken. "We've taken action and will ensure we do not breach the welfare cap. Speculation to the contrary is nonsense," he said.

The DWP pointed to figures showing that one million claimants of Incapacity Benefit - which is being replaced by the ESA - have been classed as fit for work. It said there are now 160,000 fewer people claiming sickness benefits than in 2010, with 700,000 more people looking or preparing for work.

But Dame Anne Begg, the Labour chairman of the Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee, said ministers appeared to have "believed their own rhetoric" about large numbers of claimants being fit for work.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in