MPs call for Sir Philip Green to be stripped of knighthood over BHS scandal

Commons commitees' report hits out at 'litany of failure' over collapse of retail giant

Andy McSmith@andymcsmith
Monday 25 July 2016 08:12
Philip Green was called to face questions about the collapse of BHS
Philip Green was called to face questions about the collapse of BHS

Theresa May will face calls today to act on her promise to get tough on irresponsible business practices by stripping the former BHS boss, Sir Philip Green, of his knighthood.

A new report from a group of MPs goes into scandalous detail of how Sir Philip pocketed hundreds of millions of pounds for himself and his wife, leaving the famous chain store on “life support” before selling it off to a “wholly unsuitable chancer”. After examining his record, a group of MPs from all parties have reached the devastating conclusion that they could find “little to support the reputation for retail business acumen for which he received his knighthood”.

The report, published today by the Commons Work and Pensions and Business committees, opens by quoting the words Theresa May spoke in Downing Street on her first day as Prime Minister, when she said that one way “to make our economy work for everyone is by getting tough on irresponsible behaviour in big business”. The MPs say their report is written “in this same spirit” – a clear hint to the Prime Minister to demonstrate that she is on the side of the victims of the BHS scandal, not those who pocketed millions from what the committees describe as “the unacceptable face of capitalism”.

Philip Green apologise to BHS

Their 66-page report points out that thousands will suffer from what it describes as a “litany of failure”. They include BHS’s 11,000 employers, many on low pay, whose jobs are at risk. Twenty BHS stores closed over the weekend and there is too little money left in the company to cover the pensions of its 20,000 current and former employees. That hole will have to be filled by the Pension Protection Fund, to which thousands of other pension schemes contribute, many of which are supported by businesses much smaller than BHS.

Yet those at the centre of the scandal “have walked away greatly enriched”, the report states. The biggest gainers are Sir Philip and his wife, Lady Tina Green, who are hundreds of millions of pounds richer.

The MPs scathingly describe those called before them to explain their parts in the scandal as having acted like a “circular firing squad”, apparently believing “they could absolve themselves of responsibility by blaming others. Sir Philip Green himself “adopted a scattergun approach”, liberally firing blame to all angles except his own.

The report describes the buyer of BHS, Dominic Chappell, and his associates as “incompetent and self-serving” adding that Sir Philip, Mr Chappell “and the respective directors, advisers and hangers-on who all got rich or richer are all culpable”.

It also delivers a crushing verdict on the barrister, Anthony Grabiner QC, who gave what he called “after event ratification” to the sale of BHS – meaning that as chairman of the board he approved a decision taken at a board meeting to which he had not been invited. The report says: “The complacent performance of Lord Grabiner as the non-executive chairman of the Taveta group boards represented the apogee of weak corporate governance.”

Sir Philip Green bought BHS in May 2000 for £200m and sold it for the same amount to Taveta 2, a Green family firm in July 2009. Taveta sold it for £1 in March 2015 to Retail Acquisitions Ltd (RAL), owned by Dominic Chappell.

BHS showed an increase in profit for a brief period after Sir Philip took over, but the man known as the “king of the high street” achieved this through cost cutting and squeezing suppliers, not by investing or improving turnover. In those years, dividends worth £414 – twice BHS’s after tax profit of £208m – were paid, of which, according to the report, £307m went to the Green family.

That was not the only example of Sir Philip’s lavish generosity to himself and his family. In 2001, ten BHS stores were sold for £106m to Carmen Properties, a firm registered in Jersey and ultimately owned by Sir Philip’s wife, Lady Tina Green, who lives in Monaco. Both Jersey and Monaco function as tax shelters. BHS paid Carmen £153m in rent before buying back the properties for £70m. The arrangement “reduced profits earned in the UK on which tax was payable.”

In 2005, Tavena paid its shareholders what was described as “the biggest pay cheque in British corporate history” of £1.3bn. As a result of such pay outs, the report says “by 2014, BHS was left on life-support”.

The chain of stores was then sold to a buyer who “brought no new money to the deal, took no personal risk, could offer no equity and had no means of raising funds on a sustainable basic”.

The report accuses RAL of a “negligent and cavalier disregard for the risks and potential consequences” during their “incompetent and self-serving ownership of the company”.

It adds: “In putting his ‘home team’ first, Mr Chappell and his fellow directors were personally enriched as BHS failed around them. Two directors jumped ship on the day that RAL acquired the business with personal financial rewards that it would take many BHS employees decades to earn. The others continued to profit handsomely from their positions without fulfilling their requisite responsibilities.

“In effect, Mr Chappell ‘had his hands in the till’. His description of £2.6m that he personally took, in addition to an outstanding £1.5m family loan, as a “drip” in the ocean is an insult to the employees and pensioners of BHS that he let down.”

Frank Field MP, Chair of the Work and Pensions Committee, said: “One person, and one person alone, is ultimately responsible for the BHS disaster – Sir Philip Green. What kind of man is it who can count his fortune in billions but does not know what decent behaviour is?”

Iain Wright, Chair of the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, said: “The actions of people in this sorry and tragic saga have left a stain on the reputation of business which reputable and honourable people in enterprise and commerce will find appalling.”

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

View comments