US Environmental Protection Agency tested diesel fumes on children
Advocacy groups question legality of the EPA experiments
In experiments conducted between 2003 and 2010 and funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency, children as young as 10 years of age were exposed to diesel exhaust, despite well-established warnings against diesel exposure.
An advocacy group called the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute obtained documentation of the experiments through the Freedom of Information Act.
The experiments were conducted by researchers working for two of the more prestigious universities in the US, the University of Southern California and the University of California at Los Angeles. Researchers sprayed diesel exhaust particles into the nostrils of 20 children, aged between 10 and 15 years old, according to the experiment documents, and monitoring the effects.
“Not only has EPA been caught violating the letter and spirit of virtually every national and international code, law and regulation for the protection of human subjects in medical experiments developed since World War II,” E&E lawyer David Schnare said in a statement. “But they have done so in shocking style, abusing the most vulnerable people of all, children.”
According to public documents from UCLA, the purpose of the study was to compare the ability of adults and children in producing natural chemicals – antioxidants – that protect against pollution. The highest level of diesel particles any of the children were exposed to is equivalent to two days average urban exposure in Los Angeles.
The EPA didn’t respond to calls for comment on the experiments.
“Compounding the basic villainy of the experimentation itself is that the USC/UCLA researchers failed to warn the parents and children how dangerous EPA and CARB had determined diesel exhaust to be,” Mr Schnare said. “So there was no informed consent as required by law.”
Both Mr Schnare and Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow Executive Director Craig Rucker have asked US Congress and law enforcement officials to investigate the experiment. Neither group has given any indication that they will investigate.
Follow Payton Guion on Twitter @PaytonGuion.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
-
Newest first
-
Oldest first
-
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
-
Newest first
-
Oldest first
-
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.