How the Democrats plan to use Congress to get hold of Trump’s tax returns

Representatives will cite president's 'potential conflicts of interest' domestically and abroad to justify search

Jm Rieger
Tuesday 18 December 2018 19:44
Comments
Fox News legal analyst says there is 'ample evidence' to indict Trump

Of the dozens of potential investigations House Democrats may pursue in 2019, few have received as much coverage as the possibility of examining President Donald Trump’s tax returns.

Mr Trump repeatedly promised – then refused – to release his returns in 2016. Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee now plan to formally request them from the treasury secretary during the 116th Congress.

“We’re keeping close-to-the-vest when we’re going to do this and how we’re going to do this,” Representative Bill Pascrell Jr, said in an interview with The Washington Post last week, “but leadership agrees that this should be one of our priorities.”

Mr Pascrell has led 17 separate Democratic attempts over the past two years to obtain Mr Trump’s tax returns via a little-known 1924 provision in the Internal Revenue Code that was added during America's Teapot Dome bribery scandal.

The relevant part (Section 6103 F1) says the treasury secretary “shall furnish” the tax return of any individual upon written request from the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee or the Joint Committee on Taxation.

George Yin, a University of Virginia law professor and the former executive director on the Joint Committee on Taxation, told The Washington Post that while the 6103 authority does not require a congressional subpoena, it could be considered analogous to a subpoena and therefore would likely require a legitimate legislative purpose if Mr Trump or the Treasury Department challenged it in the courts.

According to Mr Pascrell, Democrats plan to cite Mr Trump’s “potential conflicts of interest” domestically and abroad, including whether Mr Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution, as the legislative purpose. Mr Pascrell says potential conflicts could put the president in a “compromising position.”

“I’d like to go back 15 to 20 years [in Trump’s returns], and I don’t say that haphazardly, because we want to know how involved he was in these [business dealings],” Mr Pascrell said, adding he did not think there were limits on how much return information the committee could request.

Key Watergate figure John Dean says Congress will have to 'start impeachment proceedings' against Donald Trump following court filing

Even if the Ways and Means Committee gets Mr Trump’s returns, it may not provide a full picture of Mr Trump’s foreign business dealings. And the public would not see Mr Trump’s returns unless the full House voted to release them after being submitted by the committee, something Mr Pascrell says Democrats will discuss.

The provision has been used only a handful of times over the past century, including the investigation into whether the IRS targeted tax-exempt political groups in 2014 and the congressional investigation into President Richard Nixon’s returns in 1974 that resulted in Mr Nixon paying over $400,000 in back taxes to the IRS.

In November, Mr Trump warned of a “war-like posture” if Democrats requested his tax returns. Mr Yin, who has consulted with Mr Pascrell on obtaining Mr Trump’s taxes, is unaware of any court challenges to the 6103 provision, but Democrats acknowledge Mr Trump could try to block the release of his returns, which could lead to a court battle.

“This is not a way to embarrass the president. He does a good job at that himself,” Mr Pascrell said. “The chairman has the right to ask for those returns and the president may feel that there’s no law which forces him to do that and then we’ll see. We’ll go to the courts.”

The Washington Post

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in