Paris approves controversial Tour Triangle skyscraper for construction

The Tour Triangle will be the first skyscraper to be built in low-lying Paris in nearly 40 years and lots of people aren't happy about it

Jessica Ware
Tuesday 30 June 2015 19:45
Comments

Paris will see its first new skyscraper in nearly 40 years after the city approved controversial construction plans which have divided Parisians since plans were unveiled in 2008.

The Tour Triangle – or Triangle Tower – has sparked debate across the low-rise French capital since Swiss architect agency Herzog & de Meuron published designs for the 42-story tower block ahead of Paris raising the height limit on new buildings.

Inside, the tower will house a 120-room, four star hotel, a restaurant, a Shard-esque Sky Bar, and 70,000 square metres of office space. It should, Le Monde reported, create 5,000 jobs. At 180 metres tall, the Eiffel Tower will still rule the city's skyline at 300 metres.

The €500-million project will stand roughly the same height as the Gherkin in London and has been designed by the brains behind the Bird’s Nest in Beijing, the Allianz Arena in Munich and London’s Serpentine Gallery Pavilion. For most capital cities, the to-be tower would not be regarded as particularly imposing.

But Paris has historically kept its buildings low and classical. It has not built a modern skyscraper since the 1970s, when the 231-metre tall Tour Montparnasse sprung up – much to the horror of the locals, many of whom still consider it an eyesore.

Plans for the Tour Triangle were initially rejected by Paris’ city council in November 2014 but on Tuesday the huge glass project got the go-ahead from the same committee. There was a narrow majority of 87 votes for and 74 against and no abstentions, France24 reported.

The second vote was carried out in private after Paris’ mayor Anne Hidalgo dismissed November’s ballot as invalid, claiming inter-party fighting influenced the outcome. On Tuesday she tweeted that she was "proud and happy that Triangle could be born in Paris."

Paris introduced its height limit for new builds of just over 36 metres shortly after Tour Montparnasse was built. But it removed this in 2010, and citizens have waited nervously for its skyline to rise.

The Herzog & de Meuron building has always been opposed by French Green politicians who claim it is not energy efficient enough, according to France24. Residents living in the 15th arrondissement who will live around it are also reported to be displeased.

Back in November, a councillor who voted against the project, Danielle Simmonnet of the Left Party told Foreign Policy that the tower was “simultaneously megalomanical, anti-social and anti-ecological.”

Other critics said that the modern design jarred against the surrounding buildings, with Le Monde saying it “made no sense” standing “all alone” in the south of the city.

Others have argued that with a population of 12 million in the Paris metro area, skyscrapers are necessary to provide more space.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in