A Nasa telescope might have found the first ever planet outside of our own Milky Way galaxy.
If confirmed, the world would be thousands of times further away than the many exoplanets we have found in our own galaxy so far.
Scientists were able to do so using Nasa’s Chandra X-ray Observatory, using techniques that could allow for the search for other worlds to dramatically increase the amount of space it is able to scan.
Until now, every exoplanet or possible exoplanet that has been found has been in our own Milky Way. That means almost all of them are less than 3,000 light years from Earth.
The exoplanet that scientists believe they have found in our neighbouring galaxy – which is known as M51, or the Whirlpool Galaxy in recognition of its distinctive shape – would be roughly 28 million light years away.
For the most part, the nearby exoplanets have been found by watching for the small dips of light that happen as planets pass in front of their star. By investigating the characteristics of those dips, scientists are able to infer details about them, such as their size and proximity to their sun.
The new study instead looked for the dips in the brightness of X-rays as planets passed in front. The X-rays come from X-ray bright binaries, which usually include a neutron star or a black hole that pulls in gas from another star nearby – as they do, the heat up material and the glow can be seen in X-rays.
When a planet moves in front of that glowing region, it blocks some or even all of the X-rays from Earth, allowing scientists to watch for those trademark dips. The glowing region is usually smaller than a star, meaning that the dips are more dramatic, and the technique can be used for looking much deeper into space.
That is how scientists were able to find the potential planet that orbits around a binary system known as M51-ULS-1. The system includes a black hole or neutron star with a companion star roughly 20 times more massive than our Sun.
When observing that system, scientists saw the X-ray emissions drop to zero. That and other information they gathered would seem to suggest the planet would be about the size of Saturn, though it orbits its neutron star or black hole at about twice the distance Saturn does from our Sun.
But scientists are unable to confirm that the candidate really is the first ever planet detected outside of our galaxy. One problem is that the data seems to suggest that it takes about 70 years for the planet to cross in front of its binary partner again – meaning there will be no chance to watch for the dimming to happen again any time soon.
“Unfortunately to confirm that we’re seeing a planet we would likely have to wait decades to see another transit,” said co-author Nia Imara of the University of California at Santa Cruz. “And because of the uncertainties about how long it takes to orbit, we wouldn’t know exactly when to look.”
There are other possible explanations, such as gas or dust passing in front of the X-rays and blocking them out. However, those do not seem to fit with the data as well as a planet would, scientists say.
“We know we are making an exciting and bold claim so we expect that other astronomers will look at it very carefully,” said co-author Julia Berndtsson of Princeton University in New Jersey. “We think we have a strong argument, and this process is how science works.”
To find out what others are saying and join the conversation scroll down for the comments section or click here for our most commented on articles
If the planet does exist, it will have suffered through a difficult history with yet more peril to come. The planet would have had to survive the supernova explosion that created the neutron star or black hole that allowed us to see it – and at some point the companion star could explode into a supernova, battering the world with radiation.
A paper describing the findings, ‘A possible planet candidate in an external galaxy detected through X-ray transit’, is published in Nature Astronomy today.
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies