SpaceX tests twisting technique to make Starlink satellites less visible

'String of bright pearls' will still be visible in the week following launch

SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been criticised by some astronomers for disrupting observations of space
SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been criticised by some astronomers for disrupting observations of space

SpaceX has deployed a variety of tactics to make its recently launched Starlink satellites less visible in the night's sky, including twisting the position of solar panels to make them less reflective.

The private space firm had faced criticism from some astronomers, who complained that the long strings of satellites were disrupting observations.

The satellites, which are designed to beam high-speed internet back down to Earth, have also triggered hundreds of UFO reports due to their unusual formation.

Astronomers have compared their appearance to a "string of bright pearls" moving steadily across the sky, with each launch containing 60 satellites.

Eight batches of Starlink satellites have been launched so far, with plans for them to eventually form a 12,000-strong constellation.

In 2019, astrophysicist Dave Clements described the Starlink project as a "tragedy" for astronomy, claiming that the so-called megaconstellations of satellites would cause interference for both radio and optical telescopes.

In response, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said he was taking "key steps" to reduce their brightness, which are now being realised on the latest launch.

SpaceX worked with the American Astronomical Society (AAS) to test different methods to address the issue. These included painting reflective surfaces black and using sun shades to block sunlight.

The latest approach involves twisting the satellites during periods of their orbit when they are most reflective, so that only the "knife-edge" thin sides of the solar panels are visible.

SpaceX told The Independent that it also worked with the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NROA) and the Green Bank Observatory (GBO) to minimise the impact of the satellites.

Despite these measures, there will still be times that the satellites are visible to the unaided eye and will continue to be noticeable at certain times in the first week following their launch.

"We've taken an experimental and iterative approach to reducing the brightness of the Starlink satellites. Orbital brightness is an extremely difficult problem to tackle analytically," the firm said in a statement.

"There will be a small percentage of instances when the satellites cannot roll all the way to true knife edge to the Sun. This could result in the occasional set of Starlink satellites in the rorbit raise of flight that are temporarily visible for one part of an orbit."

Anyone hoping to watch the Starlink satellites pass overhead can follow their progress in real-time through the Find Starlink website.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in