We can no longer justify paying the licence fee when the BBC wastes so much money on expenses
Since January, senior managers have claimed over £60,000 a month
The Scottish independence referendum may be over, but feelings continue to run high. Mutterings about the BBC’s less than impartial coverage are also becoming louder and may – or may not – become an issue on their own.
During the final week before the nail-biting poll the BBC slipped out figures which, in normal times, would have made the front pages. For, while making hundreds of reporters redundant, ostensibly to save licence fee-payers money, senior BBC news managers were spending tens of thousands on luxury trips.
Director of news James Harding – former editor of The Times – treated himself to a £4786.55 flight to Bangkok. BA flies to Thailand for under £630 return. The “head of newsgathering” Jonathan Munro managed to spend £4628.55 on a flight to Washington DC, which BA offers for under £500 return.
Altogether, managers above grade 11 claimed expenses totalling £180,270 between January and March of this year, which is over £60,000 a month. It is an increase on the previous quarter's £173,946, at a time when the Corporation has been stating its intention to cut costs.
Some £21,720 was spent on taxis, £49,783 on train travel and £59,201 on flights. Disgraced former HR director Lucy Adams, a hate figure at Broadcasting House who was torn to shreds by Margaret Hodge when questioned by the Public Accounts Committee, still managed to charge the BBC £435.16 for a “leadership team working dinner”.
So will Director General Lord Tony Hall show the leadership he – and soon-to-retire chairman Lord Chris Patten – promised by clamping down in these unseemly extravagances? Not likely. Hall himself claimed more than £5000 for flights to and within Asia during the first three months of this year.
The BBC has strict protocols which allow staff to travel Economy Class only. Business Class flights may be authorised in exceptional circumstances only, such as travel to war zones where a journalist would be expected to start works as soon as he/she hits the ground. Yet Peter Horrocks, the outgoing “director of global” (whatever that may be), claimed £2582.87 for a trip to Ghana and Seattle. He also claimed a £3 parking ticket.
A BBC spokesperson responded by saying: “There are essential costs incurred in the running of a major broadcasting organisation. We are mindful we are spending public money and aim to drive down spend wherever possible.”
This is a classic non-response, which will remind many of the sincerity of “your call is very important to us,” spoken by a machine and often followed by a very long wait on the line. It may also remind many of the condescension employed by government departments and large public sector organisations to excuse waste, extravagance and non-accountability when their indulgences are questioned.
In the 1980s Professor Sir Alan Peacock, who founded the Edinburgh-based David Hume Institute, produced an eponymous report which recommended that the BBC should be funded not by a compulsory licence fee, but by voluntary subscription. The recommendations were never implemented, due to Margaret Thatcher’s opposition. More recently the excellent idea has been revived.
Making the BBC pay its own way is exactly what it – and we – need, and soon. A decision to move towards this seems to only way to curb the excesses of its senior managers – and much else besides. The main parties should use the successful “Better together” slogan to unite behind an idea whose time has certainly come.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.