Why I’m In: Like the British electorate, I’ll reluctantly play it safe over the European Union

The EU will have a very difficult decade ahead. Though the UK will remain on the fringe of Europe, it’s sensible to make the safer choice now

Hamish McRae
Tuesday 21 June 2016 11:39 BST
Comments
A woman waves an EU flag at Stonehenge on the longest day of the year
A woman waves an EU flag at Stonehenge on the longest day of the year

Remain will win – and with a clear margin. And I shall be voting to remain, though with reluctance.

To explain, if you look back over the past half century, the British electorate does not make mistakes: it chooses the least unattractive of the options of the options presented to it.

People who are tribal in their politics would not accept that, for they want their side to win. But most would accept the UK has not been badly governed: not perfect, but not dreadful. Right now good governance would surely be to play safe, and remain is unquestionably the safer choice.

The UK has already hedged its bets by being outside the eurozone and the Schengen Agreement. So it is outside the two main unifying projects. We dodged both those bullets.

But while the UK will remain on the fringe of Europe, and the EU will have a very difficult decade ahead, it is more sensible to make the safer choice now. That is why I think the electorate will vote for the safer option.

The margin? Some weeks ago I wrote it would be 57/43 for remain. That looks too large now, but one of the things I have learnt is that if you intuitively feel something will happen you are better to stick to your view rather than change it every time an opinion poll says something different. That approach worked for the Scottish referendum. I think it will work now.

Why the reluctance to vote remain? If you accept that the UK will always be on the fringe of the European project, the issue is this. Should we be technically a member but try to opt out of most of what it does? Or should we be technically outside, perhaps as a member of an enlarged European Free Trade Association (which we helped found), but opt in when it suits both sides?

The former is easier now but means we will have a string of rows with Europe. The latter is more disruptive in the short term but cleaner in the long.

Had the UK been making a decision on whether to join the EU knowing what we know now, there is little doubt that we would not join it. It is a huge market and that is worth a lot, but a declining one. We would be part of that outer circle, and would use out negotiating clout to get a better deal for the EFTA club.

But we are in and not doing too badly as fringe members. Given that, I go with that great Guys and Dolls song: “Sit down, you’re rockin’ the boat”.

This is not a good time to rock any boats.

The EU referendum debate has so far been characterised by bias, distortion and exaggeration. So until 23 June we’re running a series of question and answer features that explain the most important issues in a detailed, dispassionate way to help inform your decision.

What is Brexit and why are we having an EU referendum?

Will we gain or lose rights by leaving the European Union?

What will happen to immigration if there's Brexit?

Will Brexit make the UK more or less safe?

Will the UK benefit from being released from EU laws?

Will leaving the EU save taxpayers money and mean more money for the NHS?

What will Brexit do to UK trade?

How Brexit will affect British tourism

What will Brexit mean for British tourists booking holidays in the EU?

Will Brexit help or damage the environment?

Will Brexit mean that Europeans have to leave the UK?

What will Brexit mean for British

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in