Alice Neel: Painted Truths, Whitechapel Art Gallery, London
She was the great survivor of American art – and, just maybe, the portraitist who got the measure of Andy Warhol
Sunday 18 July 2010
Latest in Reviews
Related stories
On Facebook
Arts & Ents blogs
Soul Clap: In our culture there’s so much pressure to crack on
Soul Clap are one of my favourite DJ duos on the circuit, and it's not just me who loves them – they...
‘Videocracy’ and ‘Videology’: Argentina’s latest Falkland Islands / Malvinas stunt
An Argentine government video that shows an Argentine athlete training on the Falklands Islands / Ma...
Brighton Fringe: Museums and cafes and bathtubs, oh my!
The phrase ‘site-specific’ is in danger of becoming as overused in Fringe programmes as ‘locally-sou...
Three things about Alice Neel's portrait of Andy Warhol strike you straight away: the unpleasantness of its subject's flesh (saggy, fish-like, opalescent); the fact that Warhol is wearing a surgical corset over massive abdominal scars; and, last but perhaps most arresting, that his eyes are closed.
The idea of the eyes as windows to the soul is a staple of portraiture, and of Neel's portraiture in particular. Where her subjects look, how they look, what their looking looks like. Neel is, above all else, a portraitist of the eye. And yet here is Warhol, himself a painter of portraits, with his eyes shut, eyeless.
What can it mean? Alice Neel was 70 when she painted Warhol this way, a survivor of all kinds of things. In her twenties, she had lost one infant daughter to diphtheria and another to the disapproving family of her Cuban first husband. There were breakdowns, suicide attempts, spells in asylums. Neel's style, too, was a problem. In her show at the Whitechapel Art Gallery, you will see shadows of all sorts of painters – of Edward Hopper, Van Gogh, Cézanne, left-wing muralists such as Diego Rivera, of the German Neue Sachlichkeit school. All are figurative, though, a problem for Neel when Abstract Expressionism took over as the dominant American orthodoxy in the 1940s. Above all this, there was the unremitting pressure of being a woman in the notoriously macho world of New York art. Upstairs in the Whitechapel is a small, aching picture called Fire Escape, painted in 1946. Its subject is again a pair of eyes, in this case Neel's own, gazing out unseen though what look like prison bars, as trapped as an artist by her womanhood as, a couple of blocks away, was Louise Bourgeois.
And Warhol? In the late 1960s and already a pensioner, Neel suddenly hit the big time. In the Fifties, she had struggled to make ends meet. Now, an icon of the Women's Movement, she was taken up by the edgier end of the Manhattan social spectrum.
She painted media plutocrats and their wives, curators, critics such as Meyer Schapiro, poets, other artists. In 1970, she did Kate Millett, author of Sexual Politics, for the cover of Time magazine. Three years later, it was the turn of Linda Nochlin, whose 1971 essay, Why have there been no great women artists?, invented feminist art history more or less from the ground up. Unexpectedly, Neel shows Nochlin as a mother, with her six-year-old daughter, Daisy, sitting next to her on an Empire sofa. Again, it's the eyes that have it: Daisy's are excited, bright, Nochlin's shrewd, appraising and old for their years. Both, you feel, are reflections of Neel herself, of her incessantly youthful eye, the weariness of age.
And here, around the corner, is Andy Warhol with his eyes shut. I'm still puzzled about what kind of image Neel's picture is. Every portrait is a contract, a tacit agreement between artist and sitter. As we all know, it is annoyingly easy to take a photograph with the subject's eyes closed; Warhol was an inveterate snapper of other people. A painting, though, calls for complicity. Did Neel ask him to sit with his eyes shut, or was this merely one pose from many in their sitting? In either case, why did Neel, the supreme portraitist of the eye, choose to show her subject in this way?
Around another corner is an arresting canvas, called TB Harlem and painted 35 years before. It shows a man, poor and ill, lying in bed. Like Warhol, he has a wound in his side; in this case, the result of surgery to remove a tubercular rib. There, similarities between the two pictures end.
In 1940, when she made TB Harlem, Neel was still an overtly political painter, producing images of square-jawed communists and hollow-eyed workers. The subject of this picture is a left-wing martyr, his wounds inflicted by his poverty. Warhol's, by contrast, were the result of being shot by Valerie Solanas, a feminist writer and one of the Factory set. Solanas, in her testimony, gave as her reason for shooting the artist the control he had exerted over her, his inability to see his subjects as anything more than commodities. His work, his way of looking, was as far from Alice Neel's as it is possible to be. Which leaves us with a question, the answer to which I still don't know. The eyes of Neel's portraits are also her own eyes, signs at once of seeing and of being seen. Does she show Warhol as eyeless because he couldn't look at her, or at himself, or because she can hardly bring herself to look at him?
To 17 Sep (0207-522 7888)
Next Week:
Charles Darwent sees the Royal Academy's Sargent and the Sea, watered-down Impressionism with a pinch of American salt
- 1 Lady Gaga gagged as Indonesia cancels gig
- 2 So, David Cameron, is your top track 'Money' or 'Us and Them'?
- 3 A tale of two Zionists: Ze'ev Jabotinsky, David Ben Gurion and the dramatic origins of Israel
- 4 Justin de Villeneuve photographs: Faces of the Sixties
- 5 Now that's what I call music...
- 6 Ireland mourns comic talent as 'Father Ted' actor dies, aged 45
- 7 Sacha Baron Cohen's 'Dictator' takes his camel out in Cannes
- 8 Banksy gets the bunting out in north London
- 9 Picture preview: Other Worlds
- 10 The white album: celebration of British music hits sour note as black artists are overlooked
- 1 Mark Steel: Starve the Greeks and they'll feel better
- 2 Sex in dressing rooms and Play School presenters 'stoned out of their minds' - inside BBC Television Centre
- 3 Australia mourns 'Angel of the Gap' Don Ritchie, the man who talked 160 out of suicide
- 4 Fury as blind people hit by benefit reform
- 5 California, the ninth largest economy in the world, resorts to austerity
- 6 Ireland mourns comic talent as 'Father Ted' actor dies, aged 45
- 7 Grace Dent: Twitter might have turned into a party with 10 million guests, but I'm still loving every minute of it
- 8 The dark side of Dubai
- 9 QPR captain Joey Barton threatens to 'expose' Gary Lineker and says of Match of the Day pundit Alan Shearer - 'I despise him'
- 10 Coke reveals its secret: It may need to carry a cancer warning
Experience the Heineken Hub
Get free wi-fi and exclusive i content while you enjoy a tasty pint of Heineken at participating pubs.
Can you imagine a career in teaching?
Be inspired to teach - let real teachers show you how rewarding the job can be.
Keeping pace with the London 2012 Games
Cisco is providing the solutions for London 2012's complex IT needs.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Charlie Duke: I see the Moon as a science station in the future
Facebook: Is it worth it?
So, Dave, is your top track 'money' or 'us and them'?



Comments