Christian protests may leave Philip Pullman's trilogy as one of a kind
Friday, 18 July 2008
Rex
Nicole Kidman and Dakota Blue Richards in The Golden Compass, the first instalment in the planned His Dark Materials trilogy
Perhaps it has disappeared through a window into another universe, like its characters.
It looked increasingly unlikely yesterday that cinema audiences in this world will get to see the planned film sequels in Philip Pullman's children's fantasy trilogy, His Dark Materials.
Sources in the film industry said that plans for a sequel to The Golden Compass appeared to have been put on ice following the fervent Christian protests surrounding the first film, which led to boycotts and box office disappointment in the United States.
Pullman told The Independent that he had not yet been contacted by Shepperton Studios and was not aware of any imminent plans to film the sequel, The Subtle Knife. When the first film was in production last year, he was regularly contacted by Chris Weitz, its writer and director.
"I know everyone would like to see a sequel and I know I'd like to see it. When the first film was in production, I was talking to the studio and to Chris Weitz and producers quite frequently. I'm sure I would be now if the sequel was in production," he said.
Weitz said yesterday he did not want talk about the project while the studio responsible for the first film was refusing to discuss the future of the trilogy.
When The Golden Compass was release last year, New Line Cinema had high hopes for the trilogy as the new The Lord of the Rings, and the sequel was due to be released by the end of 2009.
But then the Christian boycotts started and the film sunk in the US, making a meagre $70m (£35m), although it took a hefty $300m internationally. New Line has since been merged with Warner Brothers.
Pullman said he would be dismayed if the original cast, which included Nicole Kidman and the then 12-year-old lead child star, Dakota Blue Richards, were not able to reprise their roles. "The problem with having a child in the cast is that time goes by very quickly, [and they change]... I would love to see her [Dakota] carry on the story and I'd love to see Nicole Kidman fulfil the full development of her character," he said.
If the sequel to his trilogy, His Dark Materials, was not made with the original cast, Pullman said he would harbour hopes for a sequel in the future with a fresh cast that may not meet the same level of religious protest.
The plot of the three books revolves around a fantasy world where the Reformation has never happened. This parallel universe of talking animals and witches is ruled by an oppressive Catholic institution known as the Magisterium. The challenges to religious institutions become more confrontational with every book in the trilogy, culminating with a war on heaven. Weitz, an American-born Cambridge graduate, has been vociferous in his passion for Pullman's original text, insisting on staying "true" to the trilogy if or when sequels are made. This outspokenness may have added to the studio's wariness.
Pullman said protests in America had done little to help its release, with parents protesting against the allegorical challenges to the Catholic faith. "There was a lot of fuss over that," he said.
Dan Jolin, the features editor of Empire magazine, who accompanied Weitz in the cutting room last October, said at the time that Weitz was determined to make a sequel, having saved material from the first film. Weitz told Jolin that Pullman's trilogy was influenced by Milton, and that Northern Lights, the book on which The Golden Compass is based, "is this rather beautiful idea that God kind of left all these spare bits lying around and that, for all we know, there are other universes".
Michael Gubbins, the editor of Screen International, said it was unlikely that the film could be brought out by next year, especially in a tough box office environment with "trilogy congestion" in following months, but that the franchise was likely to be revisited in the future.
Watch a clip of His Dark Materials: The Golden Compass
Other cinematic 'blasphemers'
The Life of Brian (1979)
The tale of an innocent Jewish man mistaken for Christ when the three wise men go to the wrong manger was damned as blasphemous on its release. The Monty Python team maintained it spoofed Biblical films, rather than Christianity.
The Last Temptation of Christ (1988)
Scenes in which Jesus fantasises on the cross about living as a married man and having children with Mary Magdalene sparked the fury of the US church and religious right.
Dogma (1999)
The satire about two fallen angels seeking to get back into heaven via an obscure loophole sparked protests in Britain, the United States and France.
The Da Vinci Code (2006)
The Vatican appointed an archbishop to rebut "shameful and unfounded errors".

Comments
221 Comments
Albert Einstein in the letter, he states:
Posted by ytyy | 23.07.08, 23:54 GMT
Hey, I've had a brilliant idea. Why don't all the Christians make their minds up not go to see these movies? Then they won't get all upset by the content of a work of creative fiction.
In case this concept is too tricky for the devil-dodgers to get their heads around, let me explain by way of an analogy. I choose not to go to church. That's the best way, I find, not to get all irritated by the nonsense in the bible.
Simple, but effective. Whaddaya say? Is it a deal?
Posted by Benny | 23.07.08, 21:17 GMT
I don't know so much about the theology, but I haven't seen it, not even on dvd. I'm not the sort of person who would queue around the block to see anything with Nicole Kidman in it. I just find her irritating. They screened her flop BEWITCHED the other week on TV. I didn't watch it, and it was free. To me, The Golden Compass is just another pale imitation of Lord Of The Rings. Once you've seen something so good, all else is just mere copying.
Posted by Nic Niewart | 23.07.08, 19:14 GMT
"The CHIEF THING IN CHRISTIANITY, according to the clear teaching of the Word of God, is the fire of DIVINE ZEAL, zeal for God and His glory the holy zeal which alone is able to inspire man in labors and struggles pleasing to God, and without which there is no authentic spiritual life and there is not and cannot be any true Christianity. WITHOUT THIS HOLY ZEAL, "CHRISTIANS" ARE CHRISTIANS IN NAME ONLY: they only "have a name that they live," but IN REALITY "THEY ARE DEAD", as was said to the holy Seer of Mysteries John (Apocalypse 3:1)."
Read more: users.sisqtel.net/williams/archbishopaverky/holyzeal.html
Posted by Ivan | 23.07.08, 17:57 GMT
ivan, you say that to preach the wrong stuff is akin to blasphemy. Have you ever thought that the more stuff you say the more chance there is that you're getting it wrong?
You use the term atheist as if it's an insult, same with the term lesbian. No one's insulted by you pointing out their life choices and preferences...
I can read your thoughts too, by what you write in these comments, and I know for a fact you are a very angry person filled with bitterness and hate.
You seem to want everyone to agree with you but let me tell you, buddy you're going about it the wrong way. You can catch more bees with honey.
You seem to accuse Arno of being passive in his Christianity. I have no doubt that Arno has touched more lives and made people happier with his attitude than you have by shouting and reeling of quotes likening yourself to Jesus Christ. You are the biggest blasphemer on here.
Posted by blahblah | 23.07.08, 14:34 GMT
@Jacques
"You come across as a nasty and petty individual who appears to exhibit extreme paraonia in that aethists seem to be everywhere (or at least anyone who disagrees with your very narrow and selective interpretation is an aethist)."
The interpretation of the Gospels and the Epistles CAN ONLY be very narrow. If it's written that "a bishop should be a HUSBAND of one wife" in 1 Timothy 3:2, and that "women should not teach" in 1 Timothy 2:12, and that "women should remain silent in the church" in 1 Corinthians 14:34 - and you have the Church of England practising exactly the opposite - then SOMEBODY MUST BE CLUELESS: either Christ's Apostles, or the C of E.
"When the Son of Man comes (again), will he find faith on the earth?" - Luke 18:8
Funny thing... Christ also expressed doubt that the TRUE faith will be preserved until He returns.
Posted by Ivan | 22.07.08, 22:46 GMT
Ivan
"And if You misinterpret my urge/duty to correct you or anyone else as "hate" or "spite" - that's your problem, and yours only."
Sadly it is both the worlds and heaven problem when such hatred and spite can prosper with the belief that it is just. Your use of insults and threats previously does not suggest mere correcting but rather the sin of pride and shows your hatred. I do pity you for you walk the path of damnation without being aware but sadly I doubt that anyone can alter your opinion to find the correct path and I will pray that one day you can move beyond this hatred and find God in all his love.
Posted by Arno | 22.07.08, 22:42 GMT
Arno - I have no interest, nor gain, in insulting You.
I have every possible interest, as an ORTHODOX christian, in reproving or rebuking false, heretical doctrines, blasphemies and those who utter or preach them, whenever and wherever I can.
That is my DUTY, as a christian.
I will not try to reconcile the doctrines of this world with God's Truth and God's Law, to please the non-believers or the apostates - for they are IRRECONCILABLE.
I shall be held accountable, if I preach heresies, trying, for example, to reconcile the CARNAL DOCTRINE OF PLURALISM with the ONLY Truth of the ONLY Living God, who is SPIRIT.
"Let your love not be false; abhorring evil, cling to good." - Romans, 12:9
"Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel!" - St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 9:16
And if You misinterpret my urge/duty to correct you or anyone else as "hate" or "spite" - that's your problem, and yours only.
Posted by Ivan | 22.07.08, 22:31 GMT
"Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel!" - 1 Corinthians 9:16
and from reading these pages indeed you do preach but you preach selectively to twist it into what you want it to be. From the way you have ranted and insulted others I would imagine that you ignore those aspects you want to. You come across as a nasty and petty individual who appears to exhibit extreme paraonia in that aethists seem to be everywhere (or at least anyone who disagrees with your very narrow and selective interpretation is an aethist). but then as others have stated you are probaly just an internet Troll who does not know that on internet forums typing large sections in capital letters means shouting not emphasis/ there you have learnt something new today but then you will probaly gloss over that as well. Now I imagine I will get a threat or insult in return but you are nothing to me but a small man trying to believe he is bigger than the petty figure he is so fire away
Posted by Jaques | 22.07.08, 22:29 GMT
Ivan
I am big enough to apologise but the manner in which you have been writing I fear that I would not have put it past you to have believed that, you may have been speaking in metaphor but you have also made comments which have suggested that you may have had the belief that you are special and chosen in this world and as such the assumption that you may very well have believed that you could read others thought and as such it was a logical progression to assume that this was what you meant. I do apologise for the assumption as you should be big enough to apologise for the hatred and vile insults and threats you have made towards others such as Sara and Shepherds. This may be you first step toward returning to the true path of Christianity and as such please take that step.
Posted by Arno | 22.07.08, 22:18 GMT
221 Comments