Films

9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Drag Me to Hell - Don't lose your head

Sam Raimi's 'Drag Me to Hell' is leading a renaissance in the horror genre. Jaded by torture porn, Kaleem Aftab celebrates a return to more cerebral films that reveal the inner demons

Up to their necks in it: Lorna Raver get to grips with Alison Lohman in Sam Raimi's Drag Me to Hell

REUTERS

Up to their necks in it: Lorna Raver get to grips with Alison Lohman in Sam Raimi's Drag Me to Hell

Sam Raimi, thank you. Though the film-maker has been holed up over the past decade turning Spider-Man into a mega franchise, he will go down in cinema history for giving the world The Evil Dead in 1981.

It's the classic horror film of the Eighties, and that's saying something in a decade that gave us Freddy Krueger and Jason Voorhees, the A Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th monsters who would eventually come to meet in 2003.

Now, 27 years later, Raimi has returned to the genre and made another stab at low-budget horror with Drag Me to Hell, a story of a female bank clerk (Alison Lohman) who is put under a curse when she refuses a loan to a desperate client. Whether by design or accident, it's one of the first movies to address the credit crunch. More importantly for fans of horror, Drag Me to Hell, alongside the recent Swedish vampire flick Let the Right One In, directed by Tomas Alfredson, and Lars von Trier's controversial Cannes entry Antichrist have kicked off a much-needed revitalisation of the genre that is likely to continue later in the year when several much-anticipated scare fests arrive on our screens.

Frights to look forward to include Benicio del Toro starring in The Wolf Man, a remake of the 1941 classic that is being penned by Seven and Sleepy Hollow scriptwriter Andrew Kevin Walker, Splice starring Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley as two geneticists who create a new being mixing animal and human DNA, which is being produced by Guillermo del Toro and then, following up her smash-hit film Juno, Diablo Cody presents Jennifer's Body, which stars Megan Fox as Jennifer Check, a teen sacrificed by a devil-worshipping rock band who inadvertently becomes the host of a demon.

It may sound strange to talk of the need to revitalise a genre, when horror films have been churned out over the past few years like never before and have continued to disturb the box-office charts. Take a closer look, though, at the films enticing audiences and it's a series of sequels – all those Freddy and Jason movies, reboots such as House of Wax, which starred Paris Hilton (need I say more), and then an evil host of movies such as Eli Roth's Hostel that have come to be known by the umbrella term "torture porn".

Torture porn is possibly the worst movement in the history of cinema, a sub-genre of the splatter movies that began appearing in the early 1960s that placed emphasis on visuals and positively thrived on lack of plot. Narrative development is a mere inconvenience in these films but at least these films knew their place in B-movie theatres. It was only the good ones such as George A Romero's classic Dawn of the Dead that broke out into the mainstream.

In sharp contrast, torture-porn movies are often mainstream Hollywood films with good production values that are backed by huge marketing campaigns and wide releases that ensure exposure. The basic plot of the films is that a group of people, preferably women, will walk into a hellhole where a maniac with the mind of an Abu Ghraib guard will inflict physical pain using whatever tools they can get their hand on. The threat of rape and murder are vital ingredients in ramping up the tension. The term was first coined to describe Eli Roth's Hostel in 2005, but the torture in Prague movie came around only after several films such as Saw had established the ground rules for the genre.

The film that really started the trend and turned horror into ridiculous and mostly boring sequences of graphic violence was From Dusk Till Dawn. The 1996 movie was made at the height of Quentin Tarantino's popularity when the director was so indulged that he was allowed to get away with simply writing the movie and handing the directing duties to Robert Rodriguez, all so that he could take on one of the lead roles opposite George Clooney. At least it was an original way for the Pulp Fiction director to show up his limitations as an actor. The film itself is almost split into two. The first half sets up what looks like it's going to be a psychological chiller when a bank robbery goes wrong, but descends into farce as soon as the Gecko Brothers enter a Mexican den full of criminal vampires and Salma Hayek dancing on a pole. The whole thing was a big-budget travesty that gained a cult following.

As American horrors turned into sick gore fests, the only bright lights of the genre came from Japan with the so-called J-Horror that saw the arrival of such classics as Hideo Nakata's Ring trilogy. The leading exponent was the once formidable Takashi Miike, a director whose output is so prolific he makes Rainer Werner Fassbinder look lethargic. Miike made Audition, one of the scariest films I've ever seen, but then seemed to get infected with the torture-porn bug and has never been the same since he went slasher crazy with Ichi the Killer in 2001.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Tarantino, Miike and Roth are great friends, with the Japanese director making a special appearance in Roth's Hostel: Part II, while Roth, a terrible actor, is one of the main stars of Tarantino's latest movie Inglourious Basterds.

The greatest shame is that modern British films such as Eden Lake, Donkey Punch and Severance took their leads from torture porn rather than British classics such as Michael Powell's Peeping Tom. The only recent respite from horror-slasher hell seemed to come from Spain and Mexico, especially those that had the involvement of Pan's Labyrinth director Guillermo del Toro. The Orphanage (2007) by Juan Antonio Bayona was a particular highlight.

What Raimi, von Trier and Alfredson have done in their movies, like in nearly all the great horror films, such as Rosemary's Baby, Psycho and The Exorcist, is that they have placed the emphasis on psychological damage rather than physical damage. This in turn means that when the violence surfaces in the movie it has a greater impact than when shown with no context.

Everyone remembers the great Alfred Hitchcock shower scene in Psycho but it's doubtful that the knife flailing back and forth would have had such a great impact had we not spent time learning of the criminal ways of victim Marion Crane (Janet Leigh).

It was the Freudian horror of what happens in our minds that made Psycho so brilliant, while The Exorcist took advantage of the relationship of society and the individual with God. When violence appears in Raimi's Drag Me to Hell, it's not meant to be real, often it's hilarious, and what Raimi tries to show is what is going on in the mind of his principal character. Likewise, nearly all of the graphic violence in Antichrist takes place in the mind of Charlotte Gainsbourg. And what makes Let the Right One In so appealing is not the visual effects, often they are perfunctory, but that Alfredson uses the inevitable exclusion felt by vampires from modern life to muse on isolation and alienation.

The best movies of the genre are those that say something about the times we live in. Raimi warns us to try and help others in times of economic hardship, while von Trier wants depression to be less of a taboo subject. They are about our personal demons, which the great horror films will then often manifest as memorable monsters, or complicated villains, rather than just trotting out the faceless maniacs that fans of horror have had to endure recently. Thankfully, horror is making a long-overdue return to mind over body.

Drag Me to Hell is out now

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Don't forget...
[info]clickety6 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)


Don't forget the independent zombie flick "Colin" which was apparently a big hit at Cannes this year. Looking forward to seeing this one if it is as unusual and original as the reviews suggest.
Evil Dead vs Hostel
[info]johnnyvod wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
I don't see a great deal of difference between The Evil Dead and Hostel, and like both. Remember, The Evil Dead was one of the original "video nasties", and it would be hard to argue that, after the first 30 minutes or so, the emphasis isn't purely on physical pain and gore. Hostel does take its time to set up its characters - the first half is almost violence free - and I think both it and its sequel have some genuinely good ideas in their depiction of torture as a "business". From memory, as many blokes are hurt in those films as females...
Re: Evil Dead vs Hostel
[info]freddyk1 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 11:55 am (UTC)
I agree: Hostel took its time to set up its story and did have something to say about the commodification of human flesh. The film is a lot smarter than people give it credit for, and it is a lot less violent than pieces like this (which feeds into the hysteria around the film, much of stoked by Roth himself) suggest.
Regarding Drag Me To Hell, isn't it the Lohman character who is actually in the right? She refuses to extend credit to someone who is unable to repay it. In other words, she doesn't go down the route that led to the current financial crisis. The film was written before the credit crunch and it shows.
As for Antichrist, the author's apparent claim that the film's most extreme onscreen horrors are justified because they're in Gainsbourg's mind (I'm not sure this is actually true) is specious in the context of a visual medium like film. The second half of the movie is the ultimate in "torture porn", if the author wants to talk in those terms.




Miike
[info]ja366 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC)
If the author thought "Audition" was really scary, s/he can't have seen a great deal of Asian horror.
A very poor article
[info]horror_wr wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 12:50 pm (UTC)
I've got quite a few bones of contention with statements made in this article. First off, I'm not entirely clear how Dawn of the Dead can be described as the best of the 'torture porn' of the sixties. True, the violence is graphic but the story is driven by social commentary, as are all of Romero's zombie films. I'm also not sure what films from the sixties could be classed as 'torture porn' in the first place.

In light of the comments made about Hostel, I think it's worth remembering that Eli Roth has reiterated on a number of occasions that his intention was to comment on America's own alienation from other countries at that time and how repressed sexuality can become deformed into sadomasochism. In addition, the two primary victims of torture in that film are male, not female. This can also be said of a number of other 'torture porn' films. In SAW, four out of the five victims seen are male. In SAW III, there are four male to three female victims, only one of the latter undergoes an extended period of suffering in the film. There's also an error in the article regarding Takashi Miike's involvement - his cameo was in Hostel, not Hostel II.

Further to the comments about Ichi The Killer, this film is not unique as a study in extreme violence from Asian horror cinema - Tetsuo:Iron Man, the Urosukidoji anime series & the Guinea Pig films being other examples. I would argue there is no line of connection to be drawn between the 'torture porn' trend in Western cinema and Miike's output for this reason.

I believe it is also worth mentioning that Eden Lake has been praised by critics as an effective thriller that draws on current fears in British society, and lastly, Severance is a black comedy that uses the trappings of 'torture porn' to poke fun at corporate culture and behaviour. The latter shares more common ground with Shaun of the Dead and Drag Me To Hell in its tone than it does with Hostel.
Bad examples
[info]xanther2 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 01:21 pm (UTC)
It's utter nonsense to say that From Dusk till Dawn started the torture porn trend. For one, there's a significant time gap between that movie and the torture porn films. For another, as you point out, the movie descends into farce. It's stylish, amusing stupidity with violence that's so ludicrously over-the-top that it's clearly not mean to be scary or horrifying. It's incorrect to even classify it as a horror movie.

The Audition however, is very much a torture porn film. For the most part it's very dull. The last 20 minutes are not scary, just stomach-churningly violent.
Rubbish piece
[info]freddyk1 wrote:
Friday, 5 June 2009 at 01:47 pm (UTC)
Miike was in Hostel, not its sequel. He emerges from the torture rooms saying something about it being possible to lose/spend all your money there. Moreover, the torture doesn't actually happen in Prague. Although the early scenes were shot in Prague, the setting is actually supposed to be Amsterdam. They backpackers then go by train to a town in Slovakia. So far, so wrong. No wonder, then, that the author overlooks the film's serious political subtext, lazily going down the torture porn route so as not to have to look at the film on its individual merits.

Moving on, Drag Me to Hell has nothing to do with the credit crunch, as Raimi said himself in Cannes.

The author takes Antichrist far too seriously (but then he did admit to hugging the director when he interviewed him; strange behaviour for a journalist). The film is a provocation which, like much of Lars von Trier's films, can be read in ways that contradict each other.


rubbish
[info]wretlemania wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 01:52 pm (UTC)
was this made up as you went along? or just filler for the paper? Either way, with it's gypsy-baiting racism and obvious morality DRAG ME TO HELL is a throwback to something far more dodgy than you seem to realise.
needs editing
[info]wretlemania wrote:
Sunday, 7 June 2009 at 01:59 pm (UTC)
Do you have an editor or just someone who corrects bad spelling? you could do with fact checking this article - Dawn of the Dead isn't from the 60's.

Dush Til Dawn didn't kick start torure porn.

Miike is in Hostel not Hostel 2...

and so on and so on - made up stuff supported by lazy journalism, was this stuff printed in the end, I hope for the sake of trees it wasn't.

Grow up you wasting journo - if you liked the gynocide of Antichrist, fine - just say it - but you didn't like it when Roth had a woman's eye gouged out in his film - fine. You enjoyed Lohman getting punched by an invisible monster and stapling and kicking an old woman in the head, fine - just say it - but don't pretend that you are even articulate enough to have formed an opinion in the badly written piece you have presented here.

You could have just written - "I liked Sam Raimi's new film" in big and that's all, saved us all a lot of time and effort writing back to you on a thread you'll never read.
Blame audiences
[info]r_town wrote:
Sunday, 14 June 2009 at 06:22 pm (UTC)
While I will agree with most of the sentiments in this article, I feel that it is important to make something clear. The lack of innovative horror projects is a direct result of what producers feel will make money, and in essence, is directly related to the fact that, in general, American audiences don't support unique material. All the films cited here as part of a new movement in horror, are films in which the director had complete control. DRAG ME TO HELL was directed my Sam Raimi, an A-List director who can do whatever he wants, LET THE RIGHT ONE IN, was directed independently in Sweden. I am a working horror writer / director in Hollywood, and I can say from first hand experience, that there are fantastic new scripts out there, but based on box office returns in the past, producers and studios are not willing to take the risk. On the other hand, slap Jessica Alba in any J-Horror remake, and audience come out in droves. If anyone is to blame, it's moviegoers.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date