Spotify blasted by Thom Yorke on Twitter
The Radiohead frontman has pulled his other band Atoms for Peace from the online music streaming service
Thom Yorke has denounced Spotify on Twitter after revealing he has pulled his band Atoms for Peace from the music streaming service.
The lead singer of Atoms for Peace blasted Spotify on Twitter - along with long-time producer Nigel Godrich - for failing to support upcoming artists.
Yorke tweeted: “Make no mistake new artists you discover on #Spotify will not get paid. Meanwhile shareholders will shortly be rolling in it. Simples.”
In a series of tweets Godrich said: “We’re off of Spotify…Can’t do that no more man…Someone gotta say something. It’s bad for new music…The reason is that new artists get paid f*** all with this model…It’s just an equation that doesn’t work.
“Small labels and new artists can’t even keep their lights on. It’s just not right. Millions of streams get them a few thousand dollars…Not like radio at all. If you have a massive catalogue - a major label for example then you’re quids in. It’s money for old rope…But making new recorded music needs funding.”
Radiohead frontman Yorke, who was behind the band’s decision in 2007 to give away their album online for whatever fans were willing to pay, defended criticism that he was “hurting fans” by leaving the service.
He tweeted: “‘Your small meaningless rebellion is only hurting your fans…a drop in the bucket really’ No we’re standing up for our fellow musicians.”
Yorke and Godrich’s decision to leave the service has caused a mixed reaction among their fan base. Phil Meadley tweeted: “It takes guys like you to speak up for others to take notice. Behind the scenes a lot of people are saying the same thing.”
However, other fans called for the pair to adapt to the changes in the music industry brought about by new online streaming services.
Milton Graham tweeted: “Really? Bad move. I fell in love with your album on Spotify, then later bought the album and the merch,” while @manhugs said: “Cool, I’ll just switch back to radio, where artists names aren’t mentioned, only popular groups play, and there aren’t ‘buy’ links.”
A spokesperson for Spotify said in a statement: “Spotify's goal is to grow a service which people love, ultimately want to pay for, and which will provide the financial support to the music industry necessary to invest in new talent and music. We want to help artists connect with their fans, find new audiences, grow their fan base and make a living from the music we all love.
"Right now we're still in the early stages of a long-term project that's already having a hugely positive effect on artists and new music. We've already paid $500m to rightsholders so far and by the end of 2013 this number will reach $1bn. Much of this money is being invested in nurturing new talent and producing great new music."
Arts & Ents blogs
Too upsetting? Academy members voted for Oscar-winning 12 Years A Slave 'without watching it'
The Independent Bath Literature Festival: 'Top Gear' makes Saudis look liberal, Kirsty Wark tells book festival
Mad about the girl: The cult of Veronica Mars
Stewart Lee: Beware - this man may be only joking
Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role because late wife Natasha Richardson said she wouldn't marry him if he took it
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
Poor 'live like animals' says Boris's privately educated sister after going on 'poverty safari'
White people become less racist just by moving to more diverse areas, study finds
Exclusive: Impact of immigrants on British workers ‘negligible’
- 1 International Women's Day 2014: The shocking statistics that show why it is still so important
- 2 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 3 Dear 'The Sun', breast cancer isn't sexy
- 4 Singapore sting: Sky-high prices are pushing locals to the edge of affordability
- 5 Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role because late wife Natasha Richardson said she wouldn't marry him if he took it