Naked before nine, the new art show on Channel 4
Pre-watershed series will invite viewers to join in at home with life class
ALAMY
Nude models will feature on a new television show aiming to spark a revival of traditional painting and drawing
The temperature in the television studio will be slightly higher than it was for Watercolour Challenge – it will have to be, for the benefit of the disrobed participants – and lord knows what Tony Hart would make of it.
This summer, Channel 4 will broadcast a new series before the watershed featuring nude models. The show, provisionally titled Life Class: Today's Nude, hopes to promote a return to elementary skills of drawing and painting, and spark a revival of more traditional, figurative art.
Some viewers, no doubt, will not appreciate the chance to study full-frontal male and female nudity at 6pm, three hours before the 9pm watershed.
The five-part series, scheduled to air on consecutive days in July, will invite viewers to sketch along at home while an expert in the corner of the screen offers advice. It will be produced by Artangel, the group behind Rachel Whiteread's 1993 casting, House.
Alan Kane, the artist who had the idea for the show, said: "Because it is educational and non-sexualised nudity, Channel 4 didn't have any concerns with it at all."
Although known for his conceptual work, such as his collaboration with the Turner Prize winner Jeremy Deller, Mr Kane said what inspired him to become an artist was life drawing and he has mourned its diminished popularity. "It has definitely come off the agenda at art school," he said.
Once seen as a must in developing the skills of would-be artists, life-drawing, or figure drawing as it is also known, has seen its status decline in recent years. Many art students have shunned taking the classes, forcing some schools to drop it from the curriculum.
Its suffering has coincided with the rise of BritArt and, more commonly, with the rise of art that relies on the use of computers and digital wizardry rather than paint and canvas. The main problem is that there are few jobs in life artistry, whereas students with technical skills honed on a computer have more options.
The artist (and Independent columnist) Tracey Emin has her roots in life drawing. She attended classes for seven years and has posed as a nude model. One of her exhibitions, When I think About Sex, includes four nude self-portraits.
John Beyer, the director of the broadcasting standards group Mediawatch-UK, said that Channel 4 had "an obsession with sex and nudity".
But John Whittingdale, the Conservative chairman of the Culture Select Committee, said he would not object to nude life drawing classes shown before 9pm provided they were in an "educational context" and avoided "gratuitous titillation".
Such restraint would break with Channel 4's provocative traditions. In 1983, barely a year after the channel's inception, its pop music show, Minipops, was attacked for putting girls in adult clothes and make-up and encouraging them to perform provocative routines. Then, in 1986, it broadcast film scenes of incest and cannibalism.
Perhaps Channel 4's most famous moment of sexual content came in 1993 when its flagship soap opera, Brookside, screened British television's first pre-watershed lesbian kiss – an at-the-time unmissable clinch between actresses Anna Friel and Nicola Stephenson. The series also featured a storyline about an incestuous brother and sister.
In 2002, Channel 4 screened a live autopsy. This was followed in 2004 by a documentary which showed a woman undergoing an abortion. And in 2007 it cancelled plans for "Wank Week" – a seven-day celebration of masturbation – despite the earlier success of "Penis Week" and a programme called Designer Vaginas.
Briony Lewis - Life model: What I do is not pornography
Comment
I began life modelling a year ago after spotting a poster asking for volunteers in Cyprus. It was an idea that had interested me before. I found I really enjoyed it and the artist said I was a natural, so, when I returned to England, I decided to pursue it as a career.
Having no artistic ability of my own I saw it as a way I could contribute to art; it allows me to be part of something I would otherwise not be able to participate in.
People think it is simply a case of taking your clothes off and sitting still, but there is more to it than that. You have to talk with the artist and find out what they want to achieve from the session and take an active interest in the type of work the artist wants to produce. I love looking at the paintings afterwards and seeing different artists' interpretations of my appearance. Every picture is very different.
Some people equate what I do with pornography or see it as seedy in some way, but I could not disagree more.
Art, like medicine, is a profession that does not see the naked human body in a sexual way. I do not associate what I do with sex – nor, I believe, do any of the artists I work with. The two are completely separate issues.
Depending on who I work for I will usually be paid between £8 and £15 per hour and I've managed to turn it almost into a full-time job. I work a few hours a week in an office doing administrative work for a recruitment company, but the rest of my week is taken up with life modelling.
A typical session involves me sitting still for up to three hours. I go into an almost meditative state and just try to relax. Sometimes I switch off completely and think about all manner of things – what I am going to have for dinner, for example, or what I plan to do over the weekend.
But other sessions require me to hold different poses every five or 10 minutes. I prefer this: it is more challenging and means that I must think about what I am doing and which pose I will adopt next.
Using life drawing as the subject of a television show is a fantastic idea. The fact that it is on before the watershed guarantees a young audience – which is great, because it will show nudity in a non-sexual way. If it means that more people discover life drawing then that is all the better.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited





Comments
All in all it seems a bit like Flann O'Brien's idea for teaching tightrope walking by correspondence.
So I'd just like to say my bit for those who use photos with more profundity. Degas used photos as does Hockney and others, they are a useful tool. Photos are often harder to interpret than a model, as you can't move around it and see details under a different angle or change lighting etc. But there again they do keep their position, as some models can lose it which can be annoying.
It would be nice to have the use of a model, but I can't afford to pay one (usually need several really), and nude life classes are not useful by and large, as in my works or compositions, people are clothed. The life class dates back to a rigid academic outlook, where one started drawing Antique Greek or Roman statues before being allowed to draw live models. But having said that I worship at the pedestal of academic drawing, few people can do it these days.
These are some drawings I did a long time ago from photos, I don't have recent drawings on the web. In general I do them quickly, letting the line speak and find its way and be as succinct as possible. The first two drawings took less than 20 minutes apiece, it shouldn't take long to find the lines that are necessary. The third took longer because teddy bears and suitcases are more difficult. I mention time, as I have actually been traumatized by life class tutors who only gave ten minutes for a quick pose, I hated it. Photos don't stipulate time either. Funny how these things stay with you. Finally, the fourth link is to my site in general. I hope you have the time to have a look, and will enjoy it.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/kathy.steph
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/kathy.steph
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/kathy.steph
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/kathy.steph
I am lucky enough to have been involved in the Figurative Art movement for 5 years, supporting my wife Rosemarie ? who has become recognised as one of the most skilled and ?Inspirational? Models in the UK. When she began modelling, such was her success, that artists asked how they could work more often with and from her and in response ? she asked me to assist her in running specific Figurative Art Workshops here in Swindon. Initially these featured Rosemarie ? but over the years this has expanded to include a wide variety of Male and Female Models. We now also run a range of highly successful 4 day figurative Art retreats that focus on a particular aspect of the genre. (www.modelled.me.uk)
However, Rosemarie still works hard as a Model in her own right ? and reports back on the wide disparity in hourly rates offered to Life Models for what is a very skilled role. A good model should be toned both physically and mentally ? and be the Catalyst to the Chemistry between the Tutor and the Artist. ? Not simply a breathing bowl of Fruit.
I am responsible for retaining models for our events ? and I am increasingly disheartened by the stories I hear from models of being badly treated in classes, paid minimal wages and having to accept cuts to work as ?There are plenty of Students and others willing to do it part time for less?. If only these individuals began to realise that the quality of the model is a direct contributing factor to the success of the class ? and ultimately to the quality of the art work being produced the Art world would be a much healthier and happier place!
Tony Orwin
Course and Model Manager
www.modelled.me.uk
Courses:modelled.me.uk
Maybe it needs something like the Windmill's old rule the 1950s: nudity, but strictly no moving.
Without such arbitrary but clear rules, it is impossible for rules of taste to tell the difference between the Killing of Sister George and Playboy TV.
Nakedness is so sexualised nowerdays, its really good that the human body will be shown in a different context to the masses, as an art student I partake in life drawing classes through the student run art society at my uni as the students had to organise this basic tool themselves.
Long live drawing the nude!
Rachie
xXx
I do object to the tone at the end of the article, connecting a programme of a nude life class (life drawing is many draughtsfolks' equivalent of daily scales for musicians) with pornography, incest, abortions and masturbation. Typically ignorant of the Indy.
People I knew used to snicker when I said i used to go to life classes. I'd say it demanded too much thought and aesthetic decision making to allow one to letch over a willie or googlies or boobies. The body is there to draw, to interpret, and drawing can be the most infinitely complex thing, while looking very simple. That reply always bored the heathens.
It would seem that newspapers are more obsessed.
http://www.lifeart.org
Although I do feel that the point of life drawing is to learn to translate 3D into a flat image, if the viewers sign up to their local life drawing class as a result of seeing the program it will have had some purpose.
http://www.lifeart.org
http://www.bigwhitefrog.com
for my experiences and observations as a naked male model, check out my blog at www.themodelundraped.blogspot.com
And "good art" means painting naked people. I never knew!
Be interesting to see it works on TV.
Interesting conclusion taken by C4!
As for anything at all indecorous, it just doesn't happen. The nearest my wife's classes ever got to it was one evening when a young male model underwent...er...a certain reaction and got very embarrassed, though England being England everyone pretended not to have noticed. He apologised to her afterwards; "Sorry, but I popped a pill yesterday night and it keeps coming back." She did once have a fifty-something male student she suspected might be more interested in naked women than drawing. But though they had a very pretty Polish girl modelling for them that week he seemed strangely dissatisfied and never came back.
"John Beyer, the director of the broadcasting standards group Mediawatch-UK, said that Channel 4 had 'an obsession with sex and nudity'."
Er, no John: I think it's you who has the obsession. Perhaps you should attend a life class to get things into their true perspective. Beneath our clothes we are all naked.
Gerard O'Grady
www.gerardogradyart.com
Why not be honest - as opposed to childish and 'naughty' - and have hardcore porn starting at 7pm? Why not? Kids see everything online these days anyway.
And let;s scrap and ban all makeover shows and shows that try and include nudity - supposedly as part of their serious content (yeah right). It really is not big or clever to show t and a these days. Just BORING. Like most TV then.
And let's not forget that Ch 4 gets licence payers money as does BBC 3!!!
A link to my site: www.jillcolchester.com