Eco-vandals take on the gas-guzzlers
Spate of attacks on 4x4 vehicles in Manchester
Police are searching for a gang of radical environmental activists after a series of attacks on 4x4 vehicles.
The gang, who claim to have targeted up to 80 vehicles across South Manchester, let down tyres and leave notes accusing the owners of adding to global warming and increasing the chances of road deaths.
In the last week tyres on 20 vehicles were slashed or deflated in the Ladybarn and Withington of the city. This follows similar attacks on 11 cars last month. Police classify the deliberate acts as criminal damage.
A statement from the activists said tyres were deflated rather than slashed. It added: "Given the threat of climate change and the Government's inaction, direct action such as this is, unfortunately, necessary. Large SUVs (Sports Utility Vehicles) emit substantially more greenhouse gases."
The statement also said accident victims were six times more likely to die if hit by an SUV rather than a smaller car.
Owners of SUVs – dubbed Chelsea tractors – have been branded irresponsible by environmentalists, for their vehicles' size and fuel consumption. Critics say the large four-wheel drive vehicles were originally intended for use by farmers on rough terrain in the countryside. But they have become popular with middle-class families living in cities and are used for school runs and shopping trips.
Patricia and Waris Ashraf had a tyre let down on their Mercedes ML outside their house in Whalley Range, making their daughter Natasha, 16, late for an A-level exam. A victim from Chorlton, who would not be named, said: "What concerns me most is that we have a child seat in the back of the car. They must have seen that, which suggests they don't care who they affect."
Doug McMillan, whose tyres were attacked in Parrs Wood, Didsbury, last week, said: "If they ever did have a noble, credible cause, they have blown it because they have reduced themselves to the status of common criminals. They are vandals, nothing else."
A member of the group calling himself James said: "These vehicles are totally unsuitable for the city, they're dangerous, polluting and an unnecessary status symbol. They should not be on our city roads."
Detective Inspector Damian Moran, from Greater Manchester Police, said: "Those responsible might believe they are making a point, but this behaviour is criminal.
"It is mindless vandalism with no regard for the distress and nuisance caused to decent members of our community and will not be tolerated.
"If anyone knows anything or has seen anything suspicious during those two nights that might help us catch those responsible, please contact me."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Reduce your global impact.
Comments
shame we have to wait for millions to suffer and die to get a few egotistical "legally abiding citizens" to understand that they are destroying the environment that belongs to everyone on the planet
In addition, someone recently pointed out to me that larger vehicles are often used to collect / drop off more than one child, reducing the number of cars on the road. Of course, one doesn't need a 4x4 to collect several children, but I'm just making a point.
Truth is, we just need to get away from burning fossil fuels in full - wasting time on attacking 4x4s is spitting in the wind - really.
Far bigger than those puny pathetic "SUVs".
.
They make a social Darwinian statement; and they intimidate other road users, in particlular pedestrians.
If you have a large family, 'people carriers' are just as adequate, and rather more social.
This class of vehicle should receive a punitive road tax, and not the current joke - which is indicative of New Labour's tokenistic attitude to climate change.
BTW, I notice it is OK for the police to make criminal attacks on climate protesters.
I do not care for larger and larger road vehicles of all types but I wouldn't seek to ban them. Long live Howard Roark.
Sorry SUV drivers we all share this planet - you need to get clear on what are the essentials.
Furthermore, there is absolutely no proof that the emissions from large cars has any effect on climate. It is just a belief that these eco-warriors have, which bears a close resemblance to religious beliefs in my opinion.
Mr Sinclair come back all is forgiven! How we all laughed at the C5 in the 1980's
The C5 should be re-launched as the C55, with extra protection and looking more like a conventional car, may still a single seater or a two seater.
New cars have to be very light but still able to protect the occupants. Need some lateral thinking. The heavier the car, the less economical.
To carry a 85Kg human, at present takes a 1300Kg Focus (never mind a 2500Kg SUV). Does not compute. too much dead weight being lugged around - very inefficient.
Link (2). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iVAuqGe
I could go on and on. Climate change is a TAX / scam.
Without C02 we'd freeze to death you idiots.
Those who pollute other people's air are criminals and vandals of a far more dangerous type, so while letting their tyres down is far from ideal, while the government continues with its pathetic inaction on the environment it seems reasonable for citizens to act in self-defence against the polluters.
Good times..
Let the good times roll...
But there is a price to paid for this fun. North sea reserves are running dry. This means it's necessary to send British soldiers to fight in Middle East conflicts to ensure that any new government is Western friendly.
When your V12 gets old, I suggest you scrap it or mothball it if its collectable. Then get yourself a more responsible car. As someone who has a few AMG V8's, V12's and other V8's I can fully understand your need for speed.
You need to think about going green - it will give you a good feeling. I suggest you take a look at something like the A8 4.2 TDi - approaching supercar performance but will go a long way between refills :-)
I dont think you will be happy with performance electric cars of today? Except perhaps a Tesla?
If your daughter is late for an exam call a taxi I am sure you can afford it!
Get a sense of perspective.
Anyway, moving on.
He is obviously attacking criticising the 4x4 owners.
The first is that you seem to be unable to read and comprehend 'english' as she is spoken. You make much of you r qualifications - assumably to bolster some part of your argument. What are they and where do you lecture (?) - a simple question with a simple and assumably verifiable answer.
If you have any sort of scientific training I assume you have some experience of tracking and validating references. Regrettably I do not see it here. Your numbers just don't stand up to any sort of scrutiny.
Whie I have problems with the extreme 'climate change' lobby (pro), I also have as many issues with idiots like you who don't read properly and don't really understand what they do read.....
Damian Moran needs to understand that those who attacked the tyres of those cars are making a point, even if this behaviour is criminal. Maybe it is, but from a moral point of view, polluting by driving a 4x4 is criminal and doing nothing against it is criminal. It's pointless to use those big words like crime and vandalism because people who attack those cars know what they do, they are not stupid.
"It is mindless vandalism with no regard for the distress and nuisance caused to decent members of our community". But.... Wait a minute..... Since when owning a 4x4 make someone a decent member of our community ?? It is the opposite !!!!! Owning and using a 4x4 make someone NOT decent !! It shows how people have been brain washed and how selfish they are !!!!! Those people don't care about the fact that they are emitting more CO2 !! It is as simple as that : you drive a 4x4, you pollute unnecessarily much more just to show your status or show off. It is stupid, it is selfish, it is dangerous.
"What concerns me most is that we have a child seat in the back of the car. They must have seen that, which suggests they don't care who they affect." Ah ah ah ah ah ah ah !!!!!!! So if you have a baby seat, therefore if you have a child, well, it means that you should be protected from everything....... Because having a child is like being disabled, you should have priority and protection..... Mmhmhmmhmhmm....
What's wrong with those people ?? Why having a child should give you more advantages ?? I can already see the answer : "if the child fall sick, we have to rush to the hospital !!". Well, ok, but if an adult fall sick, do we not need to rush him to the hospital ??
In a city, 4x4 are bad and should be banned. People driving them should be named and shamed.
For the woman who made the following comment in the article:
"What concerns me most is that we have a child seat in the back of the car. They must have seen that, which suggests they don't care who they affect."
I would ask how is it that your child is so much more important that the others in the world that will be affected by your lack of responsible action. More than suggesting you do not care who you affect, it is a certainty you do not care who you affect.
The sooner emissions regulations are introduced that remove all large engined cars from the road, the better.
More hysterical nonsense from someone who can no doubt not afford to run a car.
You stick to your bus mate, and leave the driving to the grown ups.
It is only a matter of time before the owner of a 4x4 catches some in the act, and does something about it.
Sadly though in the UK, it will be the owner of the vehicle that will be prosecuted rather than the waste of space, that is the down and out who caused damage to the vehicle.
hey sonny. If you think people are angry about the trivia of bankers and MPs, see if it's possible for you to imagine if you can with how much venom the public have for you and your toilet on wheels. I sincerely hope you receive everything that is due to you.
https://www.tai.org.au/index.php?q=n
i can understand the woman's irritation that the vandals wouldn't consider her child's car seat in the back. it was a great inconvenience. but there are too many parents who don't recognize that their cumulative choices in family transportation are threatening future generations far more than a flat tire. i call that willful ignorance beyond unconscionable.