Climate Change

Partly Sunny with Showers 3° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

Gordon Brown proposes £10 billion fund to fight climate change

By Andrew Woodcock, Press Association

Gordon Brown proposed a new global fund today to "kickstart" the Copenhagen climate change process and encourage poorer countries to start cutting greenhouse gas emissions immediately.

Just days ahead of the vital UN-sponsored climate change conference in the Danish capital, Mr Brown proposed a £10 billion rich-world fund - to which Britain would contribute £800 million - to give incentives to developing countries to halt deforestation, develop low-carbon energy sources and prepare for the effects of a warmer climate.

The Copenhagen Launch Fund would cover the years 2010/12 and deliver funds to poorer states on a "payment by results" system, under which those which showed they were taking action to halt climate change would receive more cash.

Mr Brown said he expected the proposal to be welcomed at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), which he is attending in Trinidad today.

And he said he expected it to be backed by French president Nicolas Sarkozy, who is attending CHOGM to discuss Europe's response to global warming, and by the United States.

Mr Brown said the Launch Fund would allow the world to break the "deadlock" over a deal at Copenhagen and "get moving on climate change as quickly as possible".

"It would make sure that some of the poorest countries, who are most affected by climate change... can get help so they can mitigate climate change and adopt and make the changes that are necessary," he said in a round of broadcast interviews in Trinidad.

"This is a start that could happen in 2010 and go through to 2012 and set a trajectory to getting all the big results over the next decade.

"I think it is very important that the deadlock is broken. That means that the poorer countries must have an understanding that the richer countries will help them adapt to climate change and make the necessary adjustments in their economies.

"We have got to provide some money to help that. Britain will do so, the rest of Europe will do so and I believe America will do so as well.

"That starts rolling the changes that are necessary to get the ambitious agreement we want at Copenhagen.

"Our ambitions are very high. Countries are making big announcements about cutting carbon. At the same time, we have to finance it, otherwise there would be no deal.

"This initiative from Britain, which I believe will be supported by other countries, is to get the financing sorted out."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

£10 billion fund
[info]midwinter1947 wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 02:16 pm (UTC)
It's a good start as long as it doesn't end up being diverted from the development aid provision.
Why pay other countries?
[info]blocksofwood wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 02:36 pm (UTC)
Hmmm seems like a new tax on the horizon.
Why does Britain have to contribute £800 million (nearly 1/10th of the fund), does Brown think that there are only 12 countries in the world or something like that?
The fund should be based on CO2 output per country, since India, China and the US contribute the most CO2 then they should pay the most to the funds.
With £800 million the UK could be contributing, that's a lot money that could be spent on R&D and the manufacturing of greener technology here in the UK.
We can't let the poor people of world feel guilty that we use to much CO2, so we will pay their corrupt governments to embezzle the monies anyway.
More of the same from Brown, throw taxpayers money at the problem and hope it might work.

[info]john_levett wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 03:43 pm (UTC)
Presumably, the poorer countries that he is waffling about are the same countries that after endless years of western aid are still unable to produce enough food and clean water for their populations? But now, they're going to develop 'low-carbon energy sources'...

I suggest that he passes the hat round to see just how much the proponents for AGW are prepared to shell out for their new world vision.
[info]mrjohn01 wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 04:26 pm (UTC)
There was an article on the beeb website yesterday that said the money promised in the past did not all materialize.
SSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH - Don's mention Climategate
[info]muckle10 wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 05:13 pm (UTC)
Careful don't mention Climategate as the Independent journalists are all asleep at their desks just now. I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it.
Re: SSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH - Don's mention Climategate
[info]bishbashbong wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 05:40 pm (UTC)
It is you that is asleep muckle...

'Climategate' must be something you are dreaming about because none of the MSM are talking about it so it cannot possibly be true!
Experts and Climategate
[info]kingofmumu wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 05:29 pm (UTC)
Demon sausages
I see we are being asked to eat one sausage a week less to help reduce global warming. Well if this is the cause, why don’t we ban sausages all together? I note also, they are irresponsibly building a new sausage factory in the Wirral. Sheer lunacy, has the world gone mad.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/europe/Eat-fewer-sausages-to-fight-global-warming/Article1-480816.aspx
currency wind
[info]mrstake wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 06:57 pm (UTC)
The intention is obviously to give each person in the world a dollar to wave at the same time so to ensure the air cools sufficiently to counteract the rising temperature. Climate change will happen anyhow unless we are willing to forgo many things like driving to work or down to the local school. All any government has to do is stop useless travel like that and invest in good community transport. Money will go no where as it tends to do anyhow.
Global Warming Is A Scam!
[info]gregormaxx wrote:
Friday, 27 November 2009 at 07:57 pm (UTC)
The environmental issues have been hijacked by globalist politics and corporations with a suspect agenda. If they are so worried about the environment, why don't they stop the destruction of tropical rainforests that absorb CO2? What about "Climategate" where the scientist have been found to be fixing the data? This is just another tax to be shared out by the profiteers.

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date